Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019586
Original file (20100019586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  4 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100019586 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to and retired in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

2.  The applicant states he served as a platoon leader during basic combat training and attained the highest physical fitness score.  He completed the Microwave and Radar Specialist course and served in Hawaii and Korea.  He was retired for disability and raised three children.  He performed to his fullest and accomplished his goals.  

3.  The applicant provides:

* Letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC)
* Various photographs
* Page 3 of his 4-page DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* Letter from the Department of Treasury
* Cold War Certificate of Recognition
* A self-authored biography of his service with the 25th Infantry Division

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 14 July 1972.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 26L (Tactical Microwave Systems Operations and Maintenance Specialist).

3.  He was advanced to the rank/grade of private/E-2 on 11 September 1972 in accordance with paragraph 7-19b (Accelerated Advancement) of Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System).

4.  He served in Hawaii from 13 May 1973 to 5 September 1973.  He was assigned to Battery C, 1st Battalion, 62nd Air Defense Artillery, 25th Infantry Division.  While in Hawaii, he was promoted to private first class (PFC)/E-3 on 14 July 1973.

5.  He was attached to Company A, Headquarters Command, Fort Dix, NJ, on 10 October 1973 pending a physical evaluation board.

6.  He was ultimately retired on 18 April 1974 by reason of physical disability and placed on the retired list in his retired rank/grade of PFC/E-3.

7.  There is no indication in his records that shows he was promoted to specialist four (SP4)/E-4 or SGT/E-5 during his military service.

8.  He submitted a Cold War Certificate and various photographs of himself and/or members of his family.

9.  Army Regulation 600-200, in effect at the time, prescribed policies, responsibilities, and procedures pertaining to career management of Army enlisted personnel.  Chapter 7 contained Army-wide promotion policy and procedures.  It stated, in pertinent part, that the promotion of enlisted personnel to grade E-5 through E-9, appointments, grade reductions, and grade restoration were announced in routine orders.  Unit orders were issued for promotions to grade E-3 and E-4.


10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  Items 6a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) show the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of the Soldier's separation, from the Soldier’s records.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of records shows the applicant was promoted to PFC/E-3 on 14 July 1973 and held this rank/grade until his retirement on 18 April 1974.  Nothing in his records show he was recommended for or promoted to SP4/E-4 or SGT/E-5 prior to his retirement.  Promotions of enlisted personnel were announced in routine orders.  In the absence of such orders and/or the authority for this promotion, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019586



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019586



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017768

    Original file (20120017768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided Elvis Presley's (SGT Presley) DD Form 214 which shows SGT Presley was drafted into the Army of the United States on 24 March 1958. Additionally, he states he had a better service record than SGT Presley. The ABCMR considers cases based on the evidence in an applicant's service record and the evidence they provide to support and strengthen the case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001766

    Original file (20140001766.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His evidence will show that he was a SGT/E-5; therefore, the failure to record his pay grade on his DD Form 214 was simply an oversight. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to the temporary rank of SP4, pay grade E-4, on 12 November 1967. This regulation stated that the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of separation will be entered on the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003198

    Original file (20080003198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no Special Orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record further shows that, during his service in the Republic of Vietnam, the applicant was issued an order awarding him an MOS that indicates he was appointed in a higher grade. In the absence of such orders and/or the authority for this promotion, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001293

    Original file (20140001293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement * DD Forms 214 issued on 27 July 1966 and 12 December 1969 * NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service in the Army National Guard (ARNG) of Hawaii) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant contends his record should be corrected to show he held the rank and grade of SGT/E-5 at the time of his release from active duty and the HIARNG. In the absence of an official promotion order or any document showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001293

    Original file (20140001293 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement * DD Forms 214 issued on 27 July 1966 and 12 December 1969 * NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service in the Army National Guard (ARNG) of Hawaii) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant contends his record should be corrected to show he held the rank and grade of SGT/E-5 at the time of his release from active duty and the HIARNG. In the absence of an official promotion order or any document showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012417

    Original file (20110012417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Headquarters, 723rd Maintenance Battalion, Unit Orders Number 76, dated 21 October 1968, appointed the applicant to the temporary grade of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4. There are no orders or any other document that shows he was appointed or promoted to the rank of SGT (E-5).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017166

    Original file (20120017166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Having prior active service, the applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 June 1970 in the rank of PFC and he held MOS's 13A and 13E. There are no orders in his records that show he ever served as a CPL/E-4 or was ever promoted to SGT/E-5. There is no evidence in his record that shows he went before a promotion board and was recommended for promotion to SGT/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013415

    Original file (20130013415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist four (SP4)/E-4. However, on 3 April 1984, the date of his discharge, he held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4. The applicant provides insufficient evidence to show he held the rank/grade of SGT on the date of release from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010066

    Original file (20100010066.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was permanently promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 20 May 1965 in the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1. However, his record does contains unit orders, dated 3 December 1966, that appointed him as an acting sergeant (E5).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000510

    Original file (20110000510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110000510 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Following his tour in Vietnam, the applicant was reassigned to Fort Benning, GA for duty with Company A, 5th Battalion, 31st Infantry. Item 33 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following appointments and reductions: * PVT/E-1 on 5 February 1968 * PV2/E-2 on 12 April 1968 [accelerated promotion] * PFC/E-3 on 20 July 1968 * SP4/E-4 on 12 January...