Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013415
Original file (20130013415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  15 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013415 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist four (SP4)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states a few months before his discharge he was promoted to SGT/E-5.  He has some awards and certificates showing his rank as SGT/E-5. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* Two certificates of achievement
* Certificate for award of the Army Achievement Medal

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 April 1980. He held military occupational specialties 11B (Infantryman) and 11H (Heavy Anti-armor Weapons Crewman).  

3.  He served in Hawaii from 17 July 1980 to 2 April 1984.  He was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 21st Infantry, Schofield Barracks, HI.  He was promoted to SP4/E-4 on 30 November 1981.  

4.  On 7 November 1983, he appeared before the 1st Battalion, 21st Infantry Regiment's semi-centralized SGT/Staff Sergeant promotion board.  He was recommended for promotion to SGT on 8 November 1983. 

5.  On 20 January 1984, Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, published Orders 20-61 promoting him to SGT/E-5 with an effective date of 1 February 1984 and a date of rank of 1 January 1984.  

6.  On 10 February 1984, Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, published Orders 20-24 reassigning him to the U.S. Army separation point for separation out-processing, effective 3 April 1984.  The orders listed his rank as SP4. 

7.  On 10 February 1984, Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, published Orders 41-5 amending his separation orders (Orders 20-24) to show his rank as SGT.  

8.  On 3 April 1984, Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, published Orders 74-1 rescinding his promotion to SGT/E-5.  However, the orders granted him defacto status from 1 February to 2 April 1984.

9.  He was honorably released from active duty on 3 April 1984.  He completed 
4 years of active service.  His DD Form 214 also shows in:

* Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) - SP4
* Item 4b (Pay Grade) - E-4
* Item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) - 30 November 1981

10.  He provides two certificates of achievement, dated 30 December 1983 and 27 March 1984; and a certificate, dated 29 February 1984, showing award of the Army Achievement Medal, all listing his rank as SGT. 



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was issued orders on 20 January 1984 promoting him to SGT with an effective date of 1 February 1984 and a date of rank of 1 January 1984.  However, his orders were rescinded on 3 April 1984.  He was granted defacto status (i.e., allowed to keep the higher pay) by virtue of having served in the higher grade from 1 February to 2 April 1984.  However, on 3 April 1984, the date of his discharge, he held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.  

2.  There are many reasons why a promotion order is rescinded, including but not limited to not being in a promotable status, not meeting the service remaining requirements, being suspended from favorable personnel actions, signing a declination of continued service statement, and several other reasons.  It is unknown why his promotion was rescinded. 

3.  The applicant provides insufficient evidence to show he held the rank/grade of SGT on the date of release from active duty.  As such, there is insufficient evidence to correct his DD Form 214 as he desires. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  __x______  __x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013415



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013415



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002739

    Original file (20150002739.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his: * Rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 * Award of the Army Commendation Medal 2. On 25 February 1980, Headquarters, U.S. Army Armor Center, Fort Knox published Orders 38-69 revoking Orders 183-40 that promoted him to SP5/E-5 but approving "defacto status for the period of the invalid promotion." Chapter 2 contains guidance on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003698

    Original file (20110003698.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was promoted to pay grade E-5. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was promoted to pay grade E-5 because he was recommended for promotion, but when he was reassigned his records were lost and, as a result, he was not promoted. c. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant was promoted to the grade of E-5 during the period of service under review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003198

    Original file (20080003198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no Special Orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record further shows that, during his service in the Republic of Vietnam, the applicant was issued an order awarding him an MOS that indicates he was appointed in a higher grade. In the absence of such orders and/or the authority for this promotion, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020048

    Original file (20140020048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 January 1988, the OKARNG published Orders 19-14 discharging the applicant from the OKARNG with an under honorable conditions discharge, effective 8 February 1988 and transferring him to the USAR Control Group (IRR), in accordance with paragraph 8-27g of NGR 600-200. On 5 August 1989, Headquarters, 1st Battalion, 377th Infantry Regiment, published Orders 08-01 reducing the applicant from SP4/E-4 to private first class (PFC)/E-3 effective 5 August 1989 in accordance with Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008308

    Original file (20130008308.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * the Driver and Mechanic Badge with Driver Bar * the Basic Leadership School Ribbon, i.e., the Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Professional Development Ribbon * the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 2. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement - Armed Forces of the United States) * DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record - Part...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006356

    Original file (20110006356.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * his rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 * the terminal date of his Reserve obligation as 6 May 1985 * award of the Purple Heart on 1 July 1967 and Drill Sergeant Identification Badge on 24 August 1984 * his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 19D2X 2. He may use these documents as evidence of his service as a drill sergeant in the USAR and as evidence he held...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002836

    Original file (20140002836.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * his rank as sergeant (SGT) * a secondary military occupational specialty (SMOS) – 11B (Infantryman) * completion of the M198 Howitzer Course 2. He provides: a. a USAIS diploma that shows he completed Individual Infantry Training and his 11B PMOS orders; b. a Certificate of Training that shows he completed the M198 Howitzer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000510

    Original file (20110000510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110000510 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Following his tour in Vietnam, the applicant was reassigned to Fort Benning, GA for duty with Company A, 5th Battalion, 31st Infantry. Item 33 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following appointments and reductions: * PVT/E-1 on 5 February 1968 * PV2/E-2 on 12 April 1968 [accelerated promotion] * PFC/E-3 on 20 July 1968 * SP4/E-4 on 12 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013900

    Original file (20110013900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100026184, on 4 May 2011. The applicant's records show he held an artillery MOS and served with Artillery units in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the available records that show he met any of the three qualifying conditions for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008502

    Original file (20110008502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * his rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * completion of military occupational specialty (MOS) 16S Stinger Crewman Transition Training Course * 6 months of training overseas 2. Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 635-5 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states: * items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank and...