Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019395
Original file (20100019395.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100019395 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her records to show her last name as Brxxxxxx-Spxxxxx instead of Spxxxxx on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states she wanted her discharge documents to show her name as a hyphenated name of Brxxxxxx-Spxxxxx but the clerk would not enter it as such on her DD Form 214.  She adds that the Spxxxxx name has caused her many problems with her records and she wants her name to read her former military records name.

3.  The applicant provides her DD Form 214, a court order in conjunction with her dissolution of marriage restoring her name to her previous name, and a letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service.   

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show she enlisted in the Army National Guard on 2 August 1974.  She previously served on active duty, completed initial entry training, and was awarded the military occupational specialty of medical specialist.  She attained pay grade E-7.

3.  Her records show she entered active duty with the Army National Guard on 3 March 1980.

4.  On 12 June 1994, she was married and her last name was changed to Spxxxxx. 

5.  Her DD Form 214 shows she retired on 31 August 1994 for voluntary early retirement.

6.  On 6 December 1999, the Court of Common Pleas Hocking County, Ohio, Division of Domestic Relations, granted the applicant a Decree of Dissolution of Marriage that shows she used the last name of Spxxxxx from the time of her marriage until it was restored to her previous last name of Brxxxxxx upon her divorce effective on this date.

7.  Her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows her last name as Spxxxxx and she signed this form with the last name of Spxxxxx.  Several other documents found in her records containing her signature and dated after the date of her 1994 marriage show she signed the documents with the last name of Spxxxxx.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence of record or independent evidence that suggests the last name recorded on the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 13 August 1994, exhibits a material error or injustice.  
2.  While the applicant provides a court document, filed on 6 December 1999, showing her last name of Spxxxxx was changed to her previous last name of Brxxxxxx she served from the date of her marriage on 12 June 1994 until her retirement date of 31 August 1994 under the last name shown on her DD Form 214.  Therefore, the court document filed more than 5 years after she was retired changing her name back to Brxxxxxx is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant changing her last name on her DD Form 214.

3.  Additionally, the applicant may have asked the clerk to hyphenate her last name as Brxxxxxx-Spxxxxx at the time of separation, and the clerk may have refused; however, this is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant changing her last name on her DD Form 214 at this late date.

4.  While it is understandable that the applicant desires to have her last name reflected as Brxxxxxx on her DD Form 214 there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, this ABCMR is reluctant to recommend that those records be changed.  

5.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with her application and the supporting evidence she provided which confirms the last name that she now uses will be filed in her Official Military Personnel File.  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion regarding the difference in the last name recorded on her DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019395



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019395



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019895

    Original file (20140019895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015607

    Original file (20070015607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant requested through military channels to change her name on her official military records prior to her discharge on 11 May 1994. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014526

    Original file (20080014526.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show her name as T____ R. W____-O____. Her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States) shows her name as O____-W____, T____ R____.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025925

    Original file (20100025925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her married name. The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect her maiden name and the approved official name changes that she requested throughout her military service. Records also show that, from that point on, her last name (i.e., "J-----n") is consistently recorded in her official military service records, including her DD Form 214, when she retired from active duty on 30 September 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007318

    Original file (20130007318.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her last name be shown as "Fox" on all her military records. The documents in her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File, subsequent to the above date show her last name as "Gross." ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130007318 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130007318 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008527

    Original file (20140008527.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 19 February 2014, shows her last name as "McN---." She stated her request was due to her divorce and that at the time of her retirement her last name was "McN---" as shown on her DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding an entry to item 18 of her DD Form 214 listing the name shown on the DD Form 4 she signed on 15 August 2002 _______ _ x _______...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021704

    Original file (20120021704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 July 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120021704 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. She states, in effect, she is divorced and she would like her retirement DD Form 214 to reflect her maiden name. Her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) shows she enlisted using her maiden name.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000071C070205

    Original file (20060000071C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that item 1 and item 12a, of her DD Form 214, are incorrect. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the US Army Reserve (USAR) on 2 August 1973, for 3 years, with no prior military service, under the last name of J______. The evidence of record shows that the applicant entered AD on 6 August 1973 and continued to serve until she was honorably discharged on 28 October 1976, which consist of 3 years, 2 months, and 23 days, of active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023460

    Original file (20110023460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military records reveals: a. she had served in the Regular Army from 1979 to 1985 using the name of Sonia Noemi G----a; b. she served in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) from 1986 to 2002 using the name Sonia Noemi P---z-C----o; c. she was transferred to the Retired Reserve using this same name; d. that essentially every document in her military record shows her first name as Sonia and either Noemi or the letter "N" as her middle name; and e. her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013098

    Original file (20100013098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant served under the same last name of B---------d from 24 February 1976 when her last name changed by reason of marriage, through 1 April 1987 when she divorced and elected not to change her last name, until she retired from active duty on 30 April 1997 under the same last name. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with her application and the supporting evidence she provided, which confirms her current full name,...