Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019042
Original file (20100019042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    16 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100019042 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that she entered active duty on 27 September 1977 instead of 30 January 1980, as currently reflected on her DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant states that her DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that she entered active duty on 30 January 1980 when in fact she entered active duty on 27 September 1977.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Richmond, Virginia on 28 June 1977 for a period of 3 years and training as a cargo handler.  She completed her basic training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina and her advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort Eustis, Virginia.

3.  She remained at Fort Eustis, Virginia for her first assignment after AIT.  On     1 October 1979, Army Regulation 635-5 was changed to eliminate the issuance of a DD Form 214 for immediate reenlistments.  On 29 January 1980, she was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  She had served 2 years, 7 months and 2 days of total active service.

4.  On 30 January 1980, she reenlisted at Fort Eustis for a period of 3 years.  On 30 January 1982, while serving in the pay grade of E-5 at Fort Eustis, she reenlisted for a period 3 years. 

5.  She continued to serve until she was honorably discharged on 28 December 1985 due to the expiration of her term of service (ETS).  She had served 5 years, 10 months and 29 days of active service during her current enlistment and had   2 years, 7 months, and 2 days of prior active service for a total of 8 years and 6 months.

6.  Her DD Form 214 issued at the time of her discharge shows that she entered active duty this period on 30 January 1980 and it reflects her 2 years, 7 months and 2 days of prior active service.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the 
DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will reflect active service that is performed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 and will reflect prior active service as well.  However, effective 1 October 1979, that regulation was changed to eliminate the issuance of a DD Form 214 for immediate reenlistments.  A break in service in excess of 24 hours required that a DD Form 214 be issued from that point and continues to present day. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 June 1977, at the time she reenlisted the regulation governing the issuance of the DD Form 214 had changed and therefore she was not issued a DD Form 214 for her first period of service.

2.  However, at the time of her discharge, her DD Form 214 was prepared to reflect all of her active service from 1977 until her discharge in 1985.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to change her DD Form 214 as requested.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  __X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of her service in arms.





      _______ _ X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019042





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019042



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013063

    Original file (20080013063.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For those enlisted Soldiers assigned a MOS based on civilian or other service acquired skills, this ribbon will be awarded on honorable completion of 4 months active service. These awards are not shown on her DD Form 214; therefore, she is entitled to correction of her records to show these awards. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence that shows the applicant completed MOS training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005399

    Original file (20080005399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The "KGH" Separation code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 16-5 of Army Regulation 635-200, Bar to Reenlistment, or non-retention on active duty. At the time of her discharge, she received a separation code of KGH and an RE code of 3. Furthermore, in accordance with applicable regulation in effect at the time of her discharge, the SPD and RE codes entered on her DD form 214 were consistent with the reason and authority for her discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000670C070206

    Original file (20050000670C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The form indicated, “Administrative Discharge conduct triable by Court-Martial.” The DD Form 214 shows that her character of service was under other than honorable conditions. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071866C070403

    Original file (2002071866C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 1-4b(5), states in effect, that a DD Form 214 will not be prepared for enlisted members discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment in the Regular Army. Based on the regulatory guidance for the preparation of the separation documents and given the applicant was not issued a DD Form 214 for his first enlistment, from 22 March 1977 through 4 February 1980, the Board concludes that several entries contained in Item 12 (Record of Service) of his 4 February 1983 DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040007955C070208

    Original file (040007955C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 JUNE 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040007955 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Records show the applicant should have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006729

    Original file (20080006729.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests in four separate applications (DD Forms 149) that her DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect that she was the honor graduate of her advanced individual training (AIT) class; that she completed Spanish I and II training at Legg Middle School in Coldwater, Michigan; that she was a member of the Womens Army Corp (WAC); and that the term “Intelligence” be added to her DD Form 214. The applicant was honorably discharged on 17 January 1980, under the provisions of Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012510

    Original file (20080012510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show that he entered active duty at Fort Ord, California on 24 June 1971 and not on 31 August 1977, which was his second enlistment. This regulation further states that for the entry in Block 12a (Date Entered AD [Active Duty] This Period, enter the beginning date of the continuous period of AD for issuance of this DD Form 214, for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued. Inasmuch as the applicant had received DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020094

    Original file (20130020094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 18 February 2005 to show in item 7a her Home of Record (HOR) as “8xx Fxxx Drive, Westerville, Ohio 43081.” 2. She served 4 years of active service and her DD Form 214 issued at the time of her REFRAD shows her HOR as “8xx Fxxx Drive, Westerville, Ohio 43081.” She was transferred to a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Troop Program Unit at Fort Eustis to complete the remaining 4 years of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017806C070206

    Original file (20050017806C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 December 1976, he reenlisted for a period of 3 years and training as a medical specialist. The applicant initially enlisted and entered active duty on 23 October 1973 and served until he was honorably discharged on 19 December 1976, for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. He reenlisted the following day (20 December 1976) and remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments until his retirement in 1995.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012130

    Original file (20100012130.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): * Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – master sergeant (MSG) or lieutenant colonel (LTC) * Item 4b (Pay Grade) – E8 or O5 * Item 11 (Primary Specialty) – 21 Years and 9 Months * Item 12 (Record of Service) o section a. The applicant's DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 27 June 1979, shows she enlisted in the U.S. Army...