Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018808
Original file (20100018808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100018808 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) for chief warrant officer two (CW2) and award of military occupational specialty (MOS) to 
7 October 2007.

2.  The applicant states:

* He was eligible and qualified to be promoted to CW2 on 7 October 2007
* Through no fault of his own his MOS award and promotion were approximately 8 months late
* At the time his unit was undergoing pre-mobilization and mobilization for Iraq
* He was eligible for promotion in October 2007 because he completed Warrant Officer Basic Course (WOBC) on 29 June 2007 and he met the 2-year time in grade requirement
* He was fully qualified  

3.  The applicant provides:

* DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report)
* DA Form 705 (Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard)
* Report of Medical History
* Report of Medical Examination
* Special orders, dated 25 June 2008
* Reassignment orders, dated 18 September 2006
* Promotion orders, 17 June 2008
* MOS orders, dated 16 June 2008
* Transfer orders, dated 24 January 2008

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having prior enlisted service in the Army National Guard, the applicant was appointed as a warrant officer one (WO1) in the Army National Guard effective 
7 October 2005.

2.  He completed the Automotive Maintenance WOBC on 29 June 2007.

3.  State of New Jersey (NJ) orders, dated 16 June 2008, show his MOS was changed to 915A0 effective 11 June 2008.

4.  State of NJ orders, dated 17 June 2008, show he was promoted to CW2 effective 11 June 2008 with a DOR of 7 October "2005". 

5.  Departments of the Army and the Air Force, National Guard Bureau (NGB), Special Orders Number 157 AR, dated 25 June 2008, show he was granted federal recognition for promotion to CW2, in MOS 915A, effective 11 June 2008.

6.  In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from NGB.  That office recommends approval of the applicant's request to adjust his CW2 DOR and MOS to 7 October 2007.  The opinion points out:

* he was fully qualified for promotion to CW2 on 7 October 2007
* he successfully completed the WOBC as a WO1 on 29 June 2007
* the NJ Army National Guard (NJARNG) acknowledges their failure to affix the appropriate remarks on the applicant's NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board) awarding him MOS 915A0
* this omission prevented him from being awarded his MOS in a timely manner
* the NJARNG concurs with this recommendation

7.  On 13 January 2011, a copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for comment and possible rebuttal.  The applicant did not respond within the given time frame.

8.  Table 7-1 (Minimum Time in Grade for Promotion) of National Guard Regulation 600-101 states that the minimum time in grade as a WO1 for promotion to CW2 is 2 years.


9.  Table 7-2 (Minimum Military Educational Requirements for Promotion and Time in Current Grade Required for Course Enrollment) of National Guard Regulation 600-101 requires the completion of the warrant officer basic course or equivalent certification within 2 years from date of initial appointment as WO1 for promotion to CW2.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed as a WO1 in the Army National Guard on 7 October 2005.  He completed the Automotive Maintenance WOBC on 29 June 2007 and following graduation of this course he was qualified for award of MOS 915A0.  He also met the time-in-grade requirement (24 months) on 7 October 2007.

2.  The advisory opinion points out, through no fault of the applicant, he was not awarded his MOS in a timely manner due to an administrative error in the preparation of his NGB Form 89.
 
3.  Based on the foregoing, it would be equitable to correct his military records to show his effective date and DOR for promotion to CW2, in MOS 915A0, as 
7 October 2007.  It would also be equitable to show he was granted Federal recognition for promotion to CW2, in MOS 915A0, effective 7 October 2007.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  __X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Special Orders Number 157 AR, dated 25 June 2008, to show he was granted Federal recognition effective 
7 October 2007 in the grade of CW2 in MOS 915A0.  
   
2.  The Board further recommends that the applicant be paid all back pay and allowances due as a result of this correction.



      _________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018808





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018808



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005458

    Original file (20080005458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the case of an applicant being found qualified for Federal recognition as a CW2, in accordance with paragraph 2-10c(2) of this regulation, except for the successful completion of WOCS and Department of the Army certification, the following statement will be entered on the record of proceedings (NGB Form 89): "the applicant is qualified for appointment as a warrant officer in the Army National Guard and is extended temporary Federal recognition as a warrant officer WO1 as provided by NGR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001592

    Original file (20150001592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 29 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150001592 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2), from 29 January 2013 to 21 October 2012. As a result, effective 7 January 2011, all initial appointments of WOs and promotion to higher grades, by warrant or commission, will be issued by the President (delegated to the Secretary of Defense).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005809

    Original file (20090005809.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a recommendation for promotion and promotion orders in support of his application. Evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed a WO1 on 22 September 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected, as appropriate by amending NGB Special Orders Number 306 AR, dated 8 December 2008, to show that he was promoted to CW2 with a date of rank and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013009

    Original file (20090013009.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 1059, numerous orders, NGB 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board), and NGB-ARH Policy Memorandum 07-026. The evidence of record shows that the applicant completed WOBC on 11 September 2008 and was entitled to promotion to CW2 upon completion of the course. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was promoted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000955

    Original file (20090000955.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 May 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090000955 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In an advisory opinion, dated 3 April 2009, the Chief, Personnel Division, NGB, Arlington, Virginia, acknowledged the applicant's request and recommended it be approved and that the applicant's promotion date and DOR be changed to 12 October 2008. The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed as a WO1 with a DOR of 12 October 2006, and that he completed WOBC on 20...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007625

    Original file (20120007625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    NGB Policy Memorandum 11-015, subject: Federal Recognition of WOs in the ARNG, dated 14 June 2011, states that ARNG WOs are initially appointed and are also promoted by the State or Territory to which the officer is assigned. As a result, effective 7 January 2011, all initial appointments of WOs and promotion to higher grades, by warrant or commission, will be issued by the President. This development process resulted in the delay of the promotions of all ARNG WOs (and probably WOs from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018199

    Original file (20080018199.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 7 March 2007 upon his completion of WOCS and execution of an oath of office. Subsequently, the applicant's Federal recognition packet was considered by a second GAARNG Federal Recognition Board on 13 December 2007 and the applicant executed a second oath of office on that date. Based on the recommendations of the second GAARNG Federal Recognition Board, the NGB issued orders awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012484

    Original file (20080012484.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his original date of appointment to warrant officer one (WO1) was wrong and was corrected in a previous case he submitted to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). Had it not been for the need to correct his DOR for initial appointment to WO1, the applicant would have been promoted to CW2 on 9 August 2007 as provided for in the Department of the Army memorandum, dated 14 January 2005. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015776

    Original file (20090015776.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory opinion states that the applicant was promoted to SFC on 19 November 2002, was appointed to and completed the WOBC on 18 December 2008, and met the eligibility criteria of NGB Memorandum Number 07-026. Their office recommends the Texas Army National Guard publish a corrected copy of orders promoting the applicant to CW2 with an effective date of 18 December 2008. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SFC on 19 November 2002 and he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008635

    Original file (20120008635.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The NGB Form 89 states: The applicant is qualified for appointment as a WO of the ARNG and is extended temporary Federal recognition as a WO, as provided in National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-101 (Warrant Officers – Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), to be effective from the date of successful completion of Warrant Officer Candidate School (WOCS). c. Per the Soldier's NGB Form 89, Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board dated 20 April 2010, he is promotable to...