IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 7 January 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013009
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his records be corrected by changing his date of rank (DOR) to Chief Warrant Officer Two (CW2) from 22 October 2008 to
11 September 2008.
2. The applicant states that on 14 August 2007, the National Guard Bureau (NGB) published a policy memorandum that allowed accelerated promotions for E-7 to CW2. He maintains the policy states that an E-7 with a minimum of 24 months time in grade are promotable to CW2 upon completion of the Warrant Officer Basic Course (WOBC). The applicant states that he submitted his promotion packet, but the packet could not be processed until the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) from WOBC was received. He adds that he completed WOBC on 11 September 2008 and faxed a copy of his DA Form 1059 to his battalion. He adds that upon his return from WOBC he was informed that his original promotion packet was never submitted for processing and no explanation was given for the delay.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 1059, numerous orders, NGB 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board), and NGB-ARH Policy Memorandum 07-026.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicants records show he was promoted to sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 in the Maryland Army National Guard (MDARNG) on 1 April 1998. On 1 July 2008, he was appointed as a Reserve Warrant Officer One (WO1) with an effective date of rank of 22 September 2007.
2. The applicant's DA Form 1059 shows that he attended and successfully completed WOBC 11 September 2008. Additionally, NGB Special Orders 268 AR, dated 20 October 2008, show that he was granted Federal recognition as a WO1 effective 11 September 2008.
3. Orders 297-167, dated 23 October 2008, show that the applicant was promoted to CW2 effective 22 October 2008. Additionally, NGB Special Orders 278 AR, dated 30 October 2008, show that the applicant was recommended and approved for Federal Recognition as a CW2 effective 22 October 2008.
4. A memorandum, dated 14 August 2007, Subject: Policy to Appoint SFC to CW2 (NGB-ARH Policy Number 07-026), authorized States to appoint SFC to CW2. The memorandum states that an SFC who served a minimum of two consecutive years as an E7 may be appointed to CW2 in one of two ways:
a. SFC who is certified by the DA military occupational specialty (MOS) proponent prior to the date of initial appointment (attendance of WOBC not required) may be appointed in the grade of CW2 upon completion of the Warrant Officer Course (WOCS). Constructive credit for WOCS may be granted if the Soldier has satisfactorily completed Officer Candidate School (OCS) within the previous five years.
b. SFC who is eligible for MOS training may be promoted to CW2 after completion of WOCS and WOBC. Constructive credit for WOCS may be granted if the Soldier satisfactorily completed an OCS within the previous five years.
5. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the NGB, Personnel Division. The Personnel Division recommended approval of the applicants request to adjust his date of rank to 11 September 2008 and to give him the back pay and allowances that the correction would necessitate. The Personnel Division explained that the applicant coordinated with the MDARNG Senior Army Advisor to review his packet and forward it to NGB for processing upon completion of WOBC and the subsequent receipt of his DA Form 1059. The Personnel Division offered that a Federal Recognition Examining Board was not held until 22 October 2008 even though the applicant finished WOBC on
11 September 2008. The Personnel Division quoted National Guard Regulation 600-101(Warrant Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) as stating that if the applicant was recommended by a Federal Recognition Board, promotion may be effected on the date the promotion requirements were met.
7. On 16 September 2009, a copy of the advisory opinion was sent to the applicant for his concurrence and/or acknowledgement. However, no response was received.
8. National Guard Regulation 600-601 contains policies and procedures governing the appointment, assignment and management of warrant officers of the Army National Guard. Chapter 9, paragraph 10(a) states, in pertinent part, that warrant officers may be examined for promotion not earlier than three (3) months in advance of completing the prescribed requirements if recommended by a Federal Recognition Board. Promotion may be effected on the date the promotion requirements are met.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is entitled to an adjustment of his effective date and date of rank to CW2 to 11 September 2008, with entitlement to back pay and allowances based on this adjustment.
2. The evidence of record shows that the applicant completed WOBC on
11 September 2008 and was entitled to promotion to CW2 upon completion of the course. As specified in the advisory opinion, the applicant coordinated with the MDARNG Senior Army Advisor to review his packet and forward it to NGB for processing after his DA Form 1059 was received. However, this did not occur. Therefore, in the interest of justice, it would be appropriate to adjust his DOR from 22 October 2008 to 11 September 2008.
BOARD VOTE:
____X___ ____X___ ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was promoted to the rank of CW2 with a date of rank and effective date 11 September 2008 with entitlement to all back pay and allowances associated with the new DOR and that he was granted Federal Recognition effective this date.
_______ _ X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090013009
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090013009
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015776
The advisory opinion states that the applicant was promoted to SFC on 19 November 2002, was appointed to and completed the WOBC on 18 December 2008, and met the eligibility criteria of NGB Memorandum Number 07-026. Their office recommends the Texas Army National Guard publish a corrected copy of orders promoting the applicant to CW2 with an effective date of 18 December 2008. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SFC on 19 November 2002 and he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010304
The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer two (CW2) to show an effective date of 30 March 2011. The applicant states he completed the warrant officer basic course (WOBC) on 30 March 2011 and was eligible for advancement to CW2 on that date since he had more than 2 years of time in grade as a sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 prior to his Federal recognition date. Ohio ARNG memorandum, dated 29 May 2012, subject: Correction of ARNG Promotion Effective...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018149
The applicant requests her date of rank (DOR) for promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2) in the Georgia Army National Guard (GAARNG) be amended to the date she completed the Warrant Officer (WO) Basic Course (WOBC). National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-101 (WO Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), paragraph 2-10c (in effect at the time) essentially states a Soldier in the rank of MSG may be promoted to CW2 in one of two ways, after first having served in the rank for 2...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008635
The NGB Form 89 states: The applicant is qualified for appointment as a WO of the ARNG and is extended temporary Federal recognition as a WO, as provided in National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-101 (Warrant Officers Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), to be effective from the date of successful completion of Warrant Officer Candidate School (WOCS). c. Per the Soldier's NGB Form 89, Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board dated 20 April 2010, he is promotable to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006623
c. Paragraph 9-15b(6) states in the case of an applicant being found qualified for Federal recognition as a CW2 in accordance with paragraph 2-10c(2), except for the successful completion of WOCS and Department of the Army MOS certification (i.e., completion of WOBC), the following statement will be entered on the NGB Form 89: The applicant is qualified for appointment as a warrant officer in the Army National Guard and is extended temporary Federal recognition as a Warrant Officer, W1, as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140005417
The applicant provides: * NGB Form 62E (Application for Federal Recognition as an Army National Guard (ARNG) Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the Army in the ARNG of the United States), dated 1 November 2010 * NGB Form 89, dated 20 January 2011 * NGB PPOM 11-045, dated 26 July 2011, subject: Guidance Concerning Applications for Federal Recognition of Warrant Officers * DA Form 71 (Oath of Office Military Personnel), dated 24...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025106
The applicant requests, in effect, his effective date of promotion and date of rank to chief warrant officer two (CW2) in the Army National Guard (ARNG) be adjusted from 18 November 2007 to 19 October 2006. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SFC on 1 February 2003 and he held the rank continuously until appointment to WO1 on 18 November 2005. Based on the foregoing, and in accordance with NGB-ARH Policy Memorandum Number 07-026, his promotion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20120022073
The applicant was appointed and received Federal recognition as a WO upon successful completion of WOCS effective 31 August 2011. He was awarded MOS 920A with an effective date of 16 December 2011. b. Paragraph 2 of NGB Policy Memorandum Number 07-026, dated 14 August 2007 Subject: Policy to Appoint SFC to CW2 states, "Effective on the date of this memorandum, States are authorized to appoint SFC/E7 to the grade of CW2 if they meet the criteria below. The applicant was appointed and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022073
The applicant was appointed and received Federal recognition as a WO upon successful completion of WOCS effective 31 August 2011. He was awarded MOS 920A with an effective date of 16 December 2011. b. Paragraph 2 of NGB Policy Memorandum Number 07-026, dated 14 August 2007 Subject: Policy to Appoint SFC to CW2 states, "Effective on the date of this memorandum, States are authorized to appoint SFC/E7 to the grade of CW2 if they meet the criteria below. The applicant was appointed and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018888
The advisory opinion pointed out that the applicant was promoted to SFC on 1 October 2004 and held the rank continuously until appointment to WO Candidate (E-7) and subsequent appointment as a WO1 on 28 November 2007. Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 28 November 2007 upon his initial appointment in the INARNG as a WO1. Evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SFC on 1 October 2004 and he held the rank continuously until...