Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018470
Original file (20100018470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100018470


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states he did not receive the AGCM at discharge.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant served 3 years in the Regular Army from 9 June 1975 through 8 June 1978.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) shows a steady progression through the enlisted ranks from private to specialist four.  It 

also shows he earned the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).  It also shows he had no lost time due to absence without leave or confinement.

3.  A DA Form 3355-R (Promotion Point Worksheet), dated 25 October 1977, shows in Item 8 (Awards and Decorations), zero points for awards.

4.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  It further provides:

	a.  Throughout a qualifying period, each enlisted Soldier must meet all of the following criteria for an award: 

* the immediate commander evaluates the soldier's character as above reproach
* the record of service indicates that the soldier has:

* willingly complied with the demands of the military environment
* been loyal and obedient to their superiors
* faithfully supported the goals of their organization and the Army
* conducted themselves in such an exemplary manner as to distinguish them

* while any record of nonjudicial punishment could be in conflict with recognizing the soldier's service as exemplary, such record should not he viewed as automatically disqualifying. The commander analyzes the record, giving consideration to the nature of the infraction, the circumstances under which it occurred and when. Conviction by court-martial terminates a period of qualifying service; a new period begins following the completion of sentence imposed by court-martial. 
* in terms of job performance, the soldier's efficiency must be evaluated and must meet all requirements and expectations for that soldier's grade, MOS, and experience.  Conviction by courts-martial terminates a period of qualifying service; a new period begins the following day after completion of the sentence imposed by the Court-Martial 
* individuals whose retention is not warranted under standards prescribed in Army regulations, or for whom a bar to reenlistment has been approved are not eligible for award of the AGCM

   b.  In instances of disqualification as determined by the unit commander, the commander will prepare a statement of the rationale for his or her decision. This statement will include the period of disqualification and will be referred to the individual. The unit commander will consider the affected individual's statement. If the commander's decision remains the same, the commander will forward his or her statement, the individual's statement and his or her consideration for filing in the individuals DA Form 201 (Military Personnel Records Jacket, or MPRJ). The custodian of the MPRJ will forward these documents to Commander, U S. Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center, Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN 46249-5301, for permanent filing in the individual's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests award of the AGCM.

2.  The applicant's service record shows he was a good Soldier with normal rank progression, and no lost time or indisciplines.  He served his full term of service and was honorably separated.  He should have received the AGCM.

3.  The applicant's record should be corrected as indicated below.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* awarding him the AGCM for exemplary service from 9 June 1975 through 8 June 1978


* adding the AGCM to his DD Form 214




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018470





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018470



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001082

    Original file (20120001082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 2 (Personnel Qualification Record), dated 15 January 1979, also lists his rank title as SP5 in item 9 (Grade). As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active service from 22 August 1975 through 21 August 1978, and add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026012

    Original file (20100026012.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that although he was awarded both the ARCOM and the AGCM, they do not appear on his DD Form 214. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which show he was awarded or recommended for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. The ABCMR is not an investigative body and decides cases based on the evidence that is presented in the military records provided and the independent evidence submitted with the application.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019264

    Original file (20130019264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. There are no orders awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005833C070206

    Original file (20050005833C070206.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jeanette B. McPherson | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service, a period of more than 1 year is considered a qualifying period for award of the AGCM; however, this is only applicable when a member actually leaves active duty. The evidence of record does show the applicant received an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005300

    Original file (20120005300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. The AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was awarded a second award of the ARCOM. Therefore, in the absence of orders awarding him an additional award of the ARCOM, there is no basis for granting this portion of his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010937C080407

    Original file (20070010937C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 August 1976, the Commander, United States Army Health Services Command (HSC), issued the applicant a letter of appreciation indicating that the United States Army Forces Command (FORSCOM) and Department of the Army (DA) Awards Boards completed their review of the recommendations for award submitted on personnel who participated in Operation New Arrivals, and although her services during this operation were extraordinary, the current awards policy regrettably precluded favorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091319C070212

    Original file (2003091319C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant received NJP during his service in the Army. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying honorable service from 20 November 1964 through 18 November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002951

    Original file (20140002951.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show all awards to which he is entitled, specifically the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and the Humanitarian Service Medal (HSM). His DD Form 214 does not show any awards. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020222

    Original file (20100020222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) by: * Showing his new name as changed by court order on 16 July 2010 * Showing his completion of the Psychological Operations Orientation Course of 2 weeks in 1974 * Showing his completion of the Primary Leadership Course of 4 weeks in 1978 * Awarding him the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) * Adding his award of the German Marksman’s Medal (Bronze) * Adding his Certificate of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012964

    Original file (20130012964.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and an Honorable Discharge Certificate. A review of the applicant's records shows he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service and his records contain no derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for the AGCM (1st Award). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the...