Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005300
Original file (20120005300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  11 September 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120005300 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 14 January 1981 to show two awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and three awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states he desires his DD Form 214 to show these awards.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 February 1972 for a period of 3 years, training in military occupational specialty 19E as an armor crewman, and assignment to Europe.  He completed his basic training at Fort Dix, NJ and his advanced individual training at Fort Knox, KY before being transferred to Germany on 7 July 1972.

3.  On 21 January 1975, while stationed at Fort Bliss, TX, he reenlisted for a period of 6 years, assignment to Fort Carson, CO and a selective reenlistment bonus.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 29 November 1978.

4.  His record shows he was awarded the:

* ARCOM on 1 November 1975 for meritorious service during the period of 15 April 1977 through 15 May 1978
* AGCM (1st Award) for the period 11 February 1972 through 10 February 1975
* AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 11 February 1975 through 10 February 1978

5.  On 14 January 1981, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-12, due to the short length of time remaining on active duty that precludes reassignment.  He completed 8 years, 11 months, and 4 days of creditable active service.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides Department of the Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military decorations, Army Good Conduct Medal, service medals and ribbons, combat and special skill badges and tabs, unit decorations, and trophies, and similar devices awarded in recognition of accomplishments.  It states:

	a.  There is no automatic entitlement to an award upon departure either from an assignment or from the service.

	b.  The ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

	c.  The AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was awarded a second award of the ARCOM.  Therefore, in the absence of orders awarding him an additional award of the ARCOM, there is no basis for granting this portion of his request.

2.  The applicant was awarded his first award of the AGCM for the period
11 February 1972 through 10 February 1975.  Subsequent awards of the AGCM are in 3-year increments.  As such, he was awarded his second award for the period 11 February 1975 through 10 February 1978.  However, a third award of the AGCM would have covered the period 11 February 1978 through
10 February 1981.  Since he was honorably discharged on 14 January 1981, he was 27 days short of reaching eligibility for an additional award of the AGCM.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting this portion of his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005300



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005300



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026012

    Original file (20100026012.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that although he was awarded both the ARCOM and the AGCM, they do not appear on his DD Form 214. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which show he was awarded or recommended for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. The ABCMR is not an investigative body and decides cases based on the evidence that is presented in the military records provided and the independent evidence submitted with the application.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006088

    Original file (20140006088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and any other medals he may be authorized. The evidence of record does not show that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM. Based on his completion of the Primary NCO Course, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show the NPDR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013090C071029

    Original file (20060013090C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB); and that correction of his separation document (DD Form 214). The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his retirement shows, in Item 12f (Foreign Service), the he completed 4 years, 5 months, and 23 days of overseas service during the period covered by the DD Form 214 (16 July 1975-26 June 1981). Item 13 will contain all authorized award, as contained in the Army's awards regulation, for all periods of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009457

    Original file (20080009457.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating while serving in the RVN. Paragraph 4-7 contains guidance on qualifying periods and states, in pertinent part, that qualifying periods of must be continuous enlisted active Federal military service. The evidence of record is void of any indication that the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013913

    Original file (20110013913.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He completed 4 years of active duty service. Furthermore, there is no evidence of record showing the commander took any action to deny him the AGCM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 1 August 1975 to 31 July 1978 and b. adding the AGCM (1st Award) to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075571C070403

    Original file (2002075571C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Two general orders awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal are in his file -- General Orders 1868, Headquarters, U. S. Army, Europe and Seventh Army dated 16 April 1975 (awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 14 December 1969 to 13 December 1972) and General Orders 210, Headquarters, U. S. Army Field Artillery Center and Fort Sill dated 21 January 1974 (awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal third award for the period 14 December 1972 to 13 December 1975). His...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001082

    Original file (20120001082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 2 (Personnel Qualification Record), dated 15 January 1979, also lists his rank title as SP5 in item 9 (Grade). As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active service from 22 August 1975 through 21 August 1978, and add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009142

    Original file (20120009142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 June 1999 to add the following awards: * Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (5th Award) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (5th Award) * Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA) (2nd Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (4th Award) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) (2nd Award) * Noncommissioned Officer (NCO)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028578

    Original file (20100028578.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * correction of the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) letter, dated 11 November 2010, to show his correct name and award of the Legion of Merit (LOM) * correction of the NPRC letter to show three awards of the Overseas Service Medal instead of the Overseas Service Ribbon * copies of the orders and the citation for award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device 2. The applicant states: * he was awarded the LOM upon retirement * he completed two tours of duty in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019302

    Original file (20090019302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * his date of entry was 30 May 1972 * he had no prior service * he served all 21 years and 5 months with no break in service * he had over 5 years of foreign service * he has four awards of the ARCOM * there were orders for the MSM 3. The applicant provides: * orders for the ARCOM, dated 10 June 1993 * DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) * 4 January 1991 enlistment document * orders for the Good Conduct Medal * Letter of Commendation * health records * 1974...