Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017986
Original file (20100017986.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    4 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100017986 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect her service in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) from 1 April 1992 to 23 May 1995.

2.  The applicant states that she served in the USAR immediately after her release from active duty and she desires to have that service added to her DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 11 September 1980 for a period of 6 years under the delayed entry program (DEP).  On 2 December 1980, she enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years and training as a medical specialist.  

3.  She was promoted to the pay grade of E-4 on 1 December 1982 and continued to serve until she was honorably discharged on 2 March 1992 under the Fiscal Year 1992 Enlisted Voluntary Early Transition program and the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) Program.  She had served 11 years, 3 months and 1 day of total active service and was paid $24,080.76 in SSB payments. 

4.  On 3 March 1992, she enlisted in the USAR for a period of 3 years.  She continued to serve in the USAR until she was honorably discharged from the USAR on 31 January 1995.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect information that exists at the time of release or discharge from active duty.  Service or events that occur subsequent to the date the DD Form 214 was issued will not be entered on the DD Form 214 retroactively unless the event occurred during the period covered by the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 was properly prepared to reflect her service as of the date of her discharge and she has failed to show that the form is in error.

2.  The applicable regulation specifically provides that information or events that occur subsequent to the date the DD Form 214 is issued will not be entered on that form retroactively.

3.  While it is understood why the applicant desires to have her DD Form 214 changed to reflect her subsequent service in the USAR, such a change is not authorized.

4.  However, the applicant is not precluded from requesting a statement of service from the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri, the current custodian of her service records.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of her service in arms.




      __________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100017986





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100017986



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020702

    Original file (20100020702.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be updated to reflect all of her active duty periods and her military occupational specialty (MOS) of a chaplain’s assistant. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000970

    Original file (20090000970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that all of her years of service be entered on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 28 February 1981. There is no official documentation or other evidence in the applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) that show she completed any periods of active duty over 90 days subsequent to her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013834

    Original file (20130013834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show her rank as a Specialist Four (SP4). The applicant states, in effect, that her DD Form 214 shows her rank as a PV1; however, she was a SP4 when she was discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). Accordingly, a change in her rank is not authorized under the regulations governing the preparation of the DD Form 214 and there is no basis to grant her request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021233

    Original file (20130021233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect all of her service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) from 1 January 1997 to 27 September 2004. The DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect service performed up to the period covered by the DD Form 214. Accordingly, there appears to be no error or injustice in her case and no basis to grant her request to change her DD Form 214 to reflect all of her USAR service performed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021518

    Original file (20100021518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect his character of service as honorable. The applicant provides: * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 August 1992 * his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 26 October 1999 * orders showing he was honorably discharged, dated 26 October 1999 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. It does not appear that the applicant served on active duty for a period long enough to qualify...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003721

    Original file (20080003721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 18 (Remarks) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), to show she received “$61,956.57” instead of “$85,791.43” in Special Separation Benefit (SSB) pay. If a member who has received an SSB payment becomes eligible for retired pay, recoup from the member the gross amount of SSB received, as shown on the member’s DD Form 214 [emphasis added]. The applicant wants the amount of the SSB payment on her DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022074

    Original file (20100022074.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests: * correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (DARP) Form 249 (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) to reflect the highest grade she attained was first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2 * correction of her DD Form 214 to reflect she was promoted to the rank of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and she was appointed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003696

    Original file (20110003696.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time the applicant was retired and transferred to the TDRL her disabilities were considered to be temporary. Accordingly, she was retired and issued a DD Form 214. At the time the applicant was removed from the TDRL and honorably discharged by reason of permanent physical disability with severance pay she was not on active duty and thus she was not entitled to receive another DD Form 214 or to have her previous DD Form 214 altered to reflect subsequent actions that occurred after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002474

    Original file (20140002474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her final DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her Place of Entry Into Active Duty (Place EAD) was San Antonio, TX, not Miami, FL. The applicant states that her initial DD Form 214 shows her Place EAD was Miami, FL, which is correct. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. correcting Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Dix, NJ,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016175C070206

    Original file (20050016175C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that the information contained on the DD Form 214 will apply only to the period of service covered by the DD Form 214, unless otherwise specified, and that only those specialties that have been awarded in accordance with Army Regulation 611- 201 and that have been held for at least 1 year, are authorized for entry on the DD Form 214. In accordance with the applicable regulation, the USAR service that was completed after the period covered should not be...