Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017289
Original file (20100017289.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100017289 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show this award.

2.  The applicant states she served honorably from 24 June 2003 through 17 February 2007 with no disciplinary actions.  Her unit informed her she would have the AGCM in hand upon discharge, but she did not receive it.

3.  The applicant provides no documents in support of her request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 June 2003.  She was honorably released from active duty on 16 February 2007 after completing 3 years, 7 months, and 23 days of total active service.

3.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of her DD Form 214 shows the:

* Army Commendation Medal
* Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award)
* National Defense Service Medal
* Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal
* Global War on Terrorism Service Medal
* Army Service Ribbon
* Overseas Service Ribbon (2nd Award)

4.  Section III - Service Data of her Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) shows no entries in the fields for AGCM date (i.e., date awarded) or AGCM eligibility date.

5.  The applicant's record is void of documentation showing she received nonjudicial punishment, reductions in rank/grade, any convictions by court-martial, or a commander's disqualification for award of the AGCM.

6.  The applicant's record is also void of documentation showing she was awarded the AGCM.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM, disqualification must be justified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence supports the applicant's request for correction of her record to show she was awarded the AGCM.

2.  She received an Army Commendation Medal and two awards of the Army Achievement Medal during her Army service, indicating her performance of duty was well regarded by her chain of command.


3.  The applicant's record shows no documented justification for disqualifying the applicant for award of the AGCM.  In the absence of such documentation, and in view of her having been awarded three personal awards during her Army service, it would be appropriate to award her the first award of the AGCM for the period 24 June 2003 through 23 June 2006 and to correct her DD Form 214 to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding her the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 24 June 2003 through 23 June 2006 and 

	b.  adding to item 13 of her DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal
(1st award).



      ____________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100017289



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100017289



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013220

    Original file (20120013220.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) 2nd Award and that the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 2nd Award and Army Achievement Medal (3rd Award) be added to her 1 July 2004 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty). She also provides a DA Form 638 that show he was awarded the ARCOM (1st Award) for meritorious service during the period 15 September 2000 through 11 January 2002; and a DA Form 638 that, notwithstanding the error in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019091

    Original file (20130019091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are also no entries in her military record to indicate her commanders denied her the first award of the AGCM during the period covered by her DD Form 214. Evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of service on active duty for award of the GWOTSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army, State, and Army National Guard Bureau records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following awards to item 13 of her DD Form 214 for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019947

    Original file (20140019947.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of her DD Form 214 shows she was awarded or authorized the National Defense Service Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, and the Army Lapel Button during her period of active service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 12 January 2000 through 20...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001300

    Original file (20150001300.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's service in support of OIF in Iraq from 11 October 2003 to 26 December 2003 qualified her for award of the GWOTEM; however, the applicant requests award of the ICM. c. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 5 April 2001 through 4 April 2004. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding her the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004458

    Original file (20120004458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to add award of the Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM), Valorous Unit Award (VUA), Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), and Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and her overseas service in Iraq. Therefore, she should be awarded the AGCM for the period 22 September 1999 to 21 September 2002 and her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000778

    Original file (20140000778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no available evidence to support correcting her record to show she was awarded or authorized any additional combat medals or ribbons during her tenure of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding her the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 13 February 2001 through 12 February 2004 and b. adding to her DD Form 214 the AGCM (1st Award) and the GWOTSM. __________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011712

    Original file (20130011712 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (2nd Award), Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM), Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM), Valorous Unit Award (VUA), and Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and her deployment to Iraq. Therefore, as a matter of equity she should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 19 July 2001-18 July 2004 and it should be added to her DD Form 214. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001327

    Original file (20140001327.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests her deployment to Uzbekistan and Afghanistan be shown on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 9 January 2003. After 27 June 1950, to the present time, the current standard for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal is 3 years of qualifying service, but as little as 1 year is required for the first award in those cases when the period of service ends with the termination of active enlisted Federal military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001380

    Original file (20150001380.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not show his foreign service in Iraq nor all of his authorized awards. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal evidence that he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). c. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 4 May 2000 through 3 May 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010430

    Original file (20140010430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows she was awarded the ARCOM (2nd Award) by permanent orders. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award her the AGCM (1st Award), for the period 14 June 2013 to 13 June 2014, and to correct her DD Form 214 to show it. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned by: a. awarding the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 14 June 2013 through...