IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 14 December 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100017278
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions.
2. The applicant states he did not get a fair hearing. He was not able to talk and his hand was hurt while in the service.
3. The applicant provides no additional documentation.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 April 1979. Upon completion of initial entry training he was awarded military occupational specialty 19E (Armor Crewman).
3. He accepted nonjudicial punishment on 9 May 1980 for being absent from his unit without authority during the period 17 - 21 April 1980 and on 24 April 1981 for two specifications of failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty.
4. A DA Form 3836 (Notice of Return of US Army Member from Unauthorized Absence) indicates he was in an absent without leave status (AWOL) from
3 November 1982 through 9 December 1982.
5. The applicant's separation proceedings are not available for review; however, his Official Military Personnel File contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial with his service characterized as under other than honorable conditions. He completed 3 years, 10 months, and 2 days of creditable active service with
42 days of lost time.
6. On 21 March 1989, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge.
7. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of this regulation provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. At the time, an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
8. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that his discharge should be upgraded was carefully considered.
2. Separations under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 are voluntary separations, in which the service member must admit guilt of the charges. Although his separation proceedings are not available for review with this case, it is presumed he voluntarily requested discharge from the Army to avoid a trial by court-martial.
3. The available evidence shows he accepted nonjudicial punishment on
2 occasions and had 42 days of lost time due to being AWOL. Based on this record of indiscipline, his service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. Therefore, he is not entitled to a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
4. Lacking evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Therefore, it is concluded that the characterization of his service and reason for his discharge were both proper and equitable. As a result, his discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.
5. In view of the above, his request should be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ____X____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100017278
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100017278
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003858
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 20 April 1982, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge and directed the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. There is no evidence that shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001840
The board found the applicant was undesirable for further retention in the military service because of his conviction by civil court and recommended discharge and the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 15 May 1981, the convening/separation authority approved the board of officers' findings and recommendations and ordered the applicant discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 for misconduct by reason of civil conviction and directed that he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027740
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge. He completed 1 year, 5 months, and 6 days of creditable active military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005914
On 16 February 1982, the separation authority approved his request for discharge in lieu of court-martial and directed the applicant be given an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant's request that his discharge be upgraded was carefully considered; however, there was insufficient evidence to support his request. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028275
The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. His record contains a DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet), dated 1 March 1982, which shows he was charged with one specification of violating Article 86 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) by being AWOL from on or about 3 June 1980 to on or about 25 February 1982. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018365
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged from active duty on 5 April 1982 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service with an UOTHC discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014755
The applicant requests that his general, under honorable conditions discharge be changed to a medical discharge. However, his initial DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 26 December 1972 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial with the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. In the absence of the applicant's chapter 10 discharge proceedings, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008604
The applicant states that it is his understanding that his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10 (Discharge for the Good of the Service), will be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge after 6 months from the time of discharge. There is also no evidence in the available record, nor has the applicant submitted any evidence to show, that he was told that his discharge would be upgraded 6 months...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016360
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general discharge (GD). The applicant's records contain a record of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for being AWOL from 2 September 1980 to 8 January 1981, for which he received a forfeiture of $250 pay for 2 months, and 14 days of extra duty. The applicant requests a discharge upgrade and states, in effect, he had to go AWOL to keep his son...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002062
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. The appropriate authority (a brigadier general) approved his request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 on 6 May 1982 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.