Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017180
Original file (20100017180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    4 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100017180 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, Korea Defense Service Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.  

2.  He states he was not awarded these three awards during his active service.  He enlisted for the active service for 3 years and 3 years inactive.  He believes he is entitled to the Army Good Conduct Medal based on the criteria for completion of 3 years of service.  He also believes he is entitled to award of the Korea Defense Service Medal based on his 13 month assignment in South Korea during 1972 and 1973.  He further believes he is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal due to him being on alert for transportation to Vietnam at four different intervals while on duty in South Korea.  

3.  He provides his DD Form 214 and summaries of the Army Good Conduct Medal, Korea Defense Service Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 24 November 1971.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 January 1972.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 31M (Radio Relay and Carrier Attendant).  He served in Korea from 6 August 1972 through 5 September 1973.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), Items 31 (Foreign Service) and 38 (Record of Assignments), do not show any service in Vietnam.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) shows he was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).

4.  He was honorably released from active duty in pay grade E-4 on 10 January 1975 and was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

5.  The evidence does not show he was disqualified by his unit commander for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There is no record of any disciplinary actions taken against the applicant.  His enlisted efficiency reports show his conduct and efficiency ratings were "excellent" throughout his enlistment.

6.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 lists the following awards:  the National Defense Service Medal and Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea.  The period of eligibility is 28 July 1954 to a date to be determined by the Secretary of Defense.
9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Vietnam Campaign Medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more and contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant appears to have met the criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal; however, for unknown reasons he was not awarded this medal.  There is no evidence of record which shows he was disqualified by his commander for this award.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period 13 January 1972 through 10 January 1975 and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

2.  The evidence shows he completed a qualifying period of service in Korea for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to add this award to his record at this time.

3.  The evidence further shows he was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) and this award is not shown on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, it would also be appropriate to add this award to his DD Form 214.

4.  There is no evidence to show he served in Vietnam for a qualifying period of service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.  Therefore, he is not entitled to this award and its addition to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period 13 January 1972 through 10 January 1975;

	b.  adding to Item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award), Korea Defense Service Medal, and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16); and

	c.  providing him a document to show the above corrections.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and it addition to his DD Form 214.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100017180



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100017180


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005665

    Original file (20120005665.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. He served in Vietnam and Korea and he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout this period of military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005907

    Original file (20090005907.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in Korea from on or about 25 August 1973 to on or about 2 December 1973. Therefore, he served a qualifying period for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal and is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000953

    Original file (20140000953.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 7 March 1970 to 19 January 1971; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 23 May 1971 to show these service dates. The evidence shows the applicant completed a period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018529

    Original file (20080018529.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his first period of military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008841

    Original file (20090008841.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his 30 June 1972 DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Legion of Merit, the Army Commendation Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the Korean Service Medal, the Republic Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Aircraft Crew Member Badge (referred to by the applicant as the Aviator Wings and currently known as the Aviation Badge). With the addition of several awards and the fact that all of the entries at block 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005372

    Original file (20110005372.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 24A (Service Record), covering the period of service from 7 December 1948 through 16 October 1951, shows in: a. section 7 (Combat Record): Chinese Communist Forces (CCF) Intervention, First United Nations (UN) Counteroffensive, and CCF Spring Offensive campaigns; b. section 9 (Remarks - Administrative): he was discharged on 16 October 1951, his character and efficiency were both rated as "excellent," and he had 34 months and 10 days of continuous service credit toward...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026930

    Original file (20100026930.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 16 September 1975 to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two or three bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, any qualification badges, and all other awards that he is authorized. Although the applicant's record contains three DD Forms 214 for his continuous...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006719

    Original file (20140006719.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests correct of his records to show his service in Vietnam. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in: (1) Germany from 2 November 1960 to 23 April 1964; (2) Korea from 15 March 1965 to 8 April 1966; and (3) Vietnam from 4 February 1968 to 3 February 1969. b. item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows: (1) he received "good" ratings for conduct during his periods of service from: (a) 13 November 1960 to 10 June 1964 and (b) 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016889

    Original file (20060016889.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal based on his receiving the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders or other evidence authorizing award of the Bronze Star Medal to the applicant. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 13 August 1970 to 15 February 1972; and b. showing, that, in addition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015133

    Original file (20060015133.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015133 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. While the record does not specifically state that the applicant served in active ground combat, the fact that he was assigned as an infantryman in an infantry specialty in Vietnam during five campaign periods and was...