Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016957
Original file (20100016957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100016957 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be changed to show he was permanently retired for medical reasons. 

2.  He states his records show he was temporarily retired.  

3.  He provides:

* His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 21 July 1987
* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 119 (Report of Contact), dated 1 May 2009
* A memorandum from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), dated 13 October 2009
* A statement from his son
* A self-authored statement

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 31 January 1978, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  

3.  He underwent a physical evaluation board (PEB) on 26 May 1987.  The evaluation determined:

* he was unfit for duty due to a schizophreniform disorder
* he had a definite impairment of social and industrial adaptability
* he was rated 30 percent disabled
* his physical condition was unfitting

4.  The PEB recommended:

* a temporary medical retirement and a transfer to the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) 
* reexamination during November 1988

5.  On 4 June 1987, he concurred with the aforementioned findings and waived a formal hearing.

6.  Orders Number D126-5, issued by the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Military Personnel Command (MILPERCEN), dated 29 June 1987, show he was retired effective 21 July 1987, and placed on the TDRL effective 22 July 1987.

7.  The PEB reevaluated all the available medical records on 16 March 1989 and found he was unfit for duty due to paranoidal schizophrenia, subchronic, stable, with slight impairment for social and industrial adaptability.

8.  Based on this review:

* he did not require medication, hospitalization or psychotherapy, 
* he demonstrated no overt psychiatric symptoms to the evaluating psychiatrist
* his condition was upgraded to 10 percent disabling
* his physical condition was unfitting
* the PEB recommended that he be separated from the service with severance pay, if otherwise qualified

9.  On the same date, he concurred with the aforementioned findings and waived a formal hearing.

10.  Orders Number D76-8, issued by MILPERCEN, dated 20 April 1989, show the applicant was removed from the TDRL and discharged from the military on 
20 April 1989 due to a permanent physical disability that was 10 percent disabling with severance pay.

11.  He submitted a memorandum from DFAS, Indianapolis, dated 13 October 2009, which states:

* he was placed on the TDRL on 22 July 1987
* he was discharged from the TDRL with severance pay on 1 May 1989 and, therefore, he was not entitled to monthly retired pay
* retirement payments were disbursed from 22 July 1987 through 30 April 1989
* both the above retirement pay and the severance payment, dated 24 May 1989, were all mailed to the address listed on his DD Form 214
* his claim of non-receipt of pay was forwarded to DFAS, Cleveland on 
5 October 2009

12.  He submitted an undated statement from his son, a self-authored statement, and a VA Form 119 from the VA, all of which basically reiterate the applicant's request.  

13.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army physical disability evaluation system and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank, or rating.  It provides for medical evaluation boards, which are convened to document a Soldier's medical status and duty limitations insofar as duty is affected by the Soldier's status.  A decision is made as to the Soldier's medical qualifications for retention based on the criteria in chapter 3 of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness).  If the medical evaluation board (MEB) determines the Soldier does not meet retention standards, the board will recommend referral of the Soldier to a PEB.  

14.  Army Regulation 40-501 governs medical fitness standards for enlistment, induction, appointment including officer procurement programs, retention and separation including retirement.  Once a determination of physical unfitness is made, the PEB rates all disabilities using the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).  Army Regulation 635-40, Appendix B, modifies those provisions of the rating schedule inapplicable to the military and clarifies rating guidance for specific conditions.  Ratings can range from 0 to 100 percent, rising in increments of 10 percent.  

15.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rating at least 30 percent.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years of service and a disability rating less than 30 percent.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that his status be changed to show he was permanently retired due to medical reasons. 

2.  According to the evidence of record:

* his physical and medical disabilities were thoroughly reviewed
* he was afforded an MEB and two PEBs
* he was placed on the TDRL in 1987
* he was evaluated in accordance with guidelines and procedures established by the Army in Army Regulation 635-40 in compliance with the instructions given in Department of Defense Directives and Instruction
* there is no evidence he was not evaluated appropriately 
* the PEB review in 1989 rated his condition as 10 percent disabling and recommended separation
*  on 1 May 1989, he was released from the TDRL and separated from the service with severance pay
* he concurred with the findings of the PEB  

3.  He is therefore not entitled to a correction of his records to show he was permanently retired due to medical reasons.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016957



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609515C070209

    Original file (9609515C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A Medical Evaluation Board (MEBD), dated 25 November 1986, indicates that the applicant’s pay grade was E-1, and recommended that he be referred to a physical evaluation board (PEB). A DA Form 3713, dated 7 November 1988, shows his active duty and retired pay grade as E-1. The Board notes that the applicant’s leave and earnings statement indicates that he was advanced to pay grade E-2 effective 1 September 1986, and that the DA Form 2A and DA Form 2-1 indicate that his date of rank for pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015382

    Original file (20090015382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In summary, he stated that he agreed his right hand condition should be rated at 50 percent, but disagreed with the finding that he was not given a separate rating for major depression. Although the applicant contends that as of today he has not had a formal hearing, the evidence of record shows he had a formal PEB on 18 September 1991. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition may not be considered to be a physical disability by the Army and yet be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004864C070208

    Original file (20040004864C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, through his Senator's office, that his records be corrected to show he was retired by reason of physical disability after completing 20 years of creditable active service. The 1992 TDRL periodic physical examination recommended the applicant be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired. U. S. Total Army Personnel Command Orders D14-7 dated 25 January 1993 removed him from the TDRL effective 15 February 1993 and permanently retired him with a disability rating of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008380

    Original file (20120008380.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she was removed from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with severance pay. If the RA Soldier had completed 20 years or more of active service when placed on the TDRL, the Soldier may request voluntary retirement. The evidence of record shows that on 15 December 1986 a PEB found the applicant was fit for continued military service or separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004690

    Original file (20130004690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If the Soldier meets the following criteria, the Soldier will be removed from the TDRL, permanently retired for physical disability, and entitled to receive disability retired pay: (a) the Soldier is unfit; (b) the disability causing the Soldier’s name to be placed on the TDRL has become permanent; and (c) the disability is rated at 30 percent or more under the VASRD, or the Soldier has at least 20 years of active Federal service. A Soldier will be removed from the TDRL and separated with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073053C070403

    Original file (2002073053C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A soldier on the TDRL must undergo a period medical examination and PEB evaluation at least once every 18 months to decide whether a change has occurred in the disability for which the soldier was temporarily retired. Title 10, United States Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has an impairment rated at less than 30 percent disabling. There is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant’s request for physical disability retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021424

    Original file (20100021424.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant sustained medical conditions related to her knees and hand that rendered her physically unfit. There is no evidence the applicant was unfit because of low back pain at the time she was placed on the TDRL. There is no evidence the applicant had an unfitting medical condition related to back pain when she was placed on the TDRL or when she was removed from the TDRL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016488

    Original file (20090016488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DFAS letter further states that upon notification that the applicant's retirement orders had been revoked, they suspended his retired pay account and based on this information, the applicant is not retired nor is he listed as active duty and is not eligible for concurrent retirement or disability pay. The applicant is requesting that his military disability findings of separation with severance pay be changed to permanent disability retirement based on his claim that the PEB did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04102820C070208

    Original file (04102820C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 July 1994 the Physical Disability Branch informed the applicant that information indicated that he did not report for his periodic physical examination during December 1992, and that if he did not provide an explanation for his failure to report for the examination, then no further effort would be made to schedule him, and his eligibility to receive Army retired pay would be terminated. On 17 November 1994 the Physical Disability Branch informed him that his eligibility to receive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024261

    Original file (20100024261.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of records to show assignment of the highest final disability rating applicable and not less than 50 percent for unfitting Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) retroactive to the active duty release date. The PEB further recommended the applicant be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with subsequent reevaluation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....