Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016690
Original file (20100016690.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    18 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100016690 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).  He further requests the issuance of an AGCM certificate.

2.  The applicant states he received this award along with three other Soldiers.  He was informed the paperwork would catch up with him, but it never did.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  On 4 January 1977, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in the rank of private, pay grade E-1.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 16H (Air Defense Artillery (ADA) Operations/Intelligence).

3.  On 9 May 1977, the applicant was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Battery (HHB), 1st Battalion, 67th ADA, located at Fort Lewis, Washington.

4.  On 31 October 1978, the applicant was advanced to specialist four, pay grade E-4.

5.  On 31 October 1978, the applicant departed Fort Lewis for duty in Europe with an ultimate assignment to HHB, 2nd Battalion, 56th ADA on 12 December 1978.

6.  On 15 February 1979, the applicant was reassigned to HHB, 94th ADA.

7.  On 2 May 1979, the applicant received a letter of appreciation from the Chief, Air Defense Element, 32nd ADA Command, congratulating him for outstanding performance of duty in the Missile Control Center.  He was cited for his ability to successfully operate under combat conditions for an extended period of time.

8.  On or about 10 December 1979, the applicant returned to the United States.

9.  On 11 December 1979, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  He had completed 2 years, 11 months, and 8 days of creditable active service.  He had no lost time.

10.  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of the applicant's DD Form 214 states, "short length of time remaining on active duty precludes reassignment."

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM, disqualification must be justified.



12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 further states that in instances of disqualification as determined by the unit commander, the commander will prepare a statement of the rationale for his or her decision.  This statement will include the period of disqualification and will be referred to the individual concerned for response.  The unit commander will consider the individual’s statement.  If the commander’s decision remains the same, the commander will forward his or her statement, the individual’s statement, and his or her consideration for permanent filing in the individual’s Official Military Personnel File.  The immediate commander’s decision to award the AGCM will be based on his or her personal knowledge and of the individual’s official records for the periods of service under previous commanders during the period for which the award is to be made.  However, there is no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander has approved the award and the award has been announced in permanent orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the AGCM.  He further requests the issuance of an AGCM certificate.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant served in several different units while on active duty.  He progressed through the ranks and attained the rank of specialist four, pay grade E-4.  He was recognized in a letter of appreciation for his outstanding performance.

3.  There is no evidence of record showing the applicant was disciplined for any reason.  There is no evidence showing that any of his commanders took action to deny him award of the AGCM, or that any of them had any reason to do so.

4.  In view of the above, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM, to include issuing him the certificate.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  __X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the AGCM for the period from 4 January 1977 to 
11 December 1979; and

	b.  issuing him an AGCM Certificate.




      _________X_________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016690



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016690



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008850

    Original file (20130008850.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * orders * Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) 8, dated 18 March 1982 * Lineage and Honors Information from the Center of Military History, United States Army * an article from the internet CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Orders provided by the applicant are sufficient to show he was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 2nd ADA in Korea during the period the unit was awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000957

    Original file (20150000957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant's service in support of: a. c. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 28 July 1986 through 27 July 1989. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 28 July 1986 through 27 July 1989 (Standard Name Line: SPC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011146

    Original file (20140011146.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 February 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140011146 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. Accordingly, his sentence was not disproportionate to the offenses for which he was convicted and he has failed to show sufficient evidence or reasons to warrant an upgrade of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025037

    Original file (20110025037.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the Commando Training United States Army Reserve (USAR), Primary Noncommissioned Officer Course (PNCOC), Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and the Overseas Medal be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Awards), states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013913

    Original file (20110013913.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He completed 4 years of active duty service. Furthermore, there is no evidence of record showing the commander took any action to deny him the AGCM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 1 August 1975 to 31 July 1978 and b. adding the AGCM (1st Award) to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001082

    Original file (20120001082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 2 (Personnel Qualification Record), dated 15 January 1979, also lists his rank title as SP5 in item 9 (Grade). As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active service from 22 August 1975 through 21 August 1978, and add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019582

    Original file (20090019582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to a general discharge. There is no indication in his records he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018470

    Original file (20100018470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. If the commander's decision remains the same, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004503

    Original file (20130004503.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) for the period 12 November 2001 – 11 November 2004. If the commander’s decision remains the same, the commander will forward his or her statement, the individual’s statement, and his or her consideration for permanent filing in the individual’s AMHRR. Inasmuch as the applicant was not afforded his rights under the prevailing regulation, it would serve the interest of justice to award him the AGCM (5th Award) for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017808

    Original file (20090017808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * award of the Army Commendation Medal * award of the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M-60) * award of the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar (.45 Caliber) * award of "wings" * he received a letter of appreciation and a letter of commendation * his rank/pay grade at the time of his relief from...