Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015814
Original file (20100015814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100015814 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  that upon being assigned to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) with Company C, 2nd Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment, a line unit, his first sergeant told him experienced radio operators were needed in the bush;

	b.  he served more than 40 continuous days in the field as a radio operator;

	c.  he believes the error is that he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 05B (Radio Operator) and not an 11B (Infantryman); and

	d.  he was awarded three bronze service stars for campaigns he participated in while serving in the RVN and the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) which proves he qualifies for the CIB.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his request:

* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards)


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 February 1971.  He was trained in and awarded MOS 05B as a member of the U.S. Army Signal Corps.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 8 August 1971 to 10 April 1972.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour, he was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 12th Cavalry Regiment, and to the 2nd Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment.  His assigned duty is not shown and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not include the CIB.

4.  The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) is void of any orders or documents that indicate the applicant was ever recommend for or awarded the CIB while serving in the RVN.

5.  The applicant's OMPF contains Headquarters, 3rd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, General Orders Number 1221, dated 13 April 1972.  It confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM for meritorious service in connection with ground operations against a hostile enemy in the RVN during the period August 1971 to April 1972.

6.  On 13 April 1972, the applicant was honorably released from active duty in the rank of specialist four after completing 1 year, 1 month, and 27 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued does not include the CIB among the awards listed in item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized).

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy.  Chapter 8 contains guidance on badges and tabs of U.S. origin.  Paragraph 8-6 contains guidance on the CIB criteria and requires that the member was an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; that he was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during such time as the unit was engaged in active ground combat; and that he was present with his qualifying infantry unit and actively participated in such ground combat.  Combat service or campaign credit alone is not sufficient to award the CIB.

8.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) provided for award of the CIB for service in Vietnam.  The regulation authorized award of the CIB to radio operators whose primary duty was to accompany infantry or infantry-type units on tactical operations.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contends that he should be awarded the CIB.

2.  Regulations in effect at the time authorized award of the CIB to Signal Corps Soldiers who held MOS 05B provided their primary duty was to accompany infantry or infantry-type units on tactical operations.  Unfortunately, the applicant's records do not show that he served in this duty.

3.  The applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents indicating that the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB by proper authority while serving on active duty, and the CIB is not included in the list of awards contained on his DA Form 20 or DD Form 214.  

4.  The applicant states that his award of the BSM substantiates his entitlement to the CIB.  However, award of the BSM is not the sole criterion for awarding the CIB.  Absent any evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant confirming he served as a radio operator in MOS 05B with a qualifying unit while actively engaged in combat, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award CIB has not been satisfied in this case.

5.  In view of the above, the applicants request should be denied.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X____  __X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015814



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015814



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018778

    Original file (20100018778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence shows the applicant served in an infantry MOS in a qualifying infantry unit for a short period; however, it also shows he served as a scout observer and switchboard operator, neither of which is listed as a position authorizing award of the CIB in the RVN. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010907

    Original file (20060010907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    X The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He states that during his service in the RVN, he served in combat as an infantry officer and feels he is entitled to award of the CIB. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by showing his entitlement to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 3 bronze service stars with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103890C070208

    Original file (2004103890C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Robert Rogers | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge; by showing he is entitled to 3 bronze service stars with his Vietnam Service Medal; and by providing him a corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014297

    Original file (20110014297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 21 January 1969. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. Although the evidence of record shows he was assigned to the199th Infantry Brigade and to the 1st Armor Calvary Division in what appears to be MOS 05C, there is no evidence to show he was TDY in support of the Cambodian Incursion and personally present...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001079

    Original file (20100001079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). By regulation, in order to support award of the CIB, in addition to evidence that a member served in an infantry MOS or as a radio operator accompanying infantry or infantry-type units on tactical operations while assigned to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083460C070212

    Original file (2003083460C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) does not show 11B (Infantryman) as his secondary MOS and the CIB as an authorized award. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in the RVN from 30 November 1967 to 28 May 1968. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016028

    Original file (20080016028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board further determined that the applicant was not awarded SMOS 11F until 13 October 1969, subsequent to his RVN service, and that his record failed to show he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or BSM with “V” Device for Valor. The applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or BSM by proper authority while serving on active duty. The evidence of record is void of any orders or other documents that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084649C070212

    Original file (2003084649C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record does confirm that the applicant served a qualifying period of honorable service, from 25 September 1969 to 30 April 1971, which entitles him to receive the first award of the AGCM. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his honorable period of service from 25 September 1969 to 30 April 1971; by showing that he earned the Army Commendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059007C070421

    Original file (2001059007C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his military records do not reflect that he was awarded the CIB and the BSM with “V” Device. The CIB and BSM with “V” Device are not recorded in the DA Form 20. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served as a light weapons infantryman (11B) in an infantry unit involved in combat operations while serving in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001031

    Original file (20140001031 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SGT (E-5) and awarded MOS 05C4O; however, item 23a of his DD Form 214 shows MOS 05C2O. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal...