IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 18 November 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100014458
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his reentry eligibility (RE) code from an RE-3 to an RE-1 so he can reenter military service.
2. The applicant states he was late coming back from his wedding and was confined in the stockade for 3 weeks as a result.
3. The applicant did not provide any documentary evidence.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 October 2006 and held military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman). He was assigned to Company D, 2nd Combined Arms Battalion, 5th Brigade Combat Team, Fort Bliss, TX.
2. On 4 January 2008, he accepted nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice for disorderly conduct and being disrespectful to a noncommissioned officer.
3. On 30 May 2008, he departed his unit in an absent without leave (AWOL) status, but he returned on 9 June 2008.
4. On 1 July 2008, he was convicted by a summary court-martial of one specification of being AWOL and two specifications of being disrespectful in language and/or deportment toward a superior noncommissioned officer.
5. On 6 August 2008, his immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with paragraph 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) for misconduct commission of a serious offense. He cited the applicant's AWOL as the specific reason and recommended a general discharge.
6. On 6 August 2008, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the separation memorandum and subsequently consulted with legal counsel who advised him of the basis for the contemplated separation for misconduct and its effect, of the rights available to him and the effect of any action taken by him in waiving his rights, and the type of discharge and its effect on further enlistment or reenlistment. He understood he could expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life if a general under honorable conditions discharge was issued to him and that he could be ineligible for many or all benefits as a veteran under Federal and State laws. He further elected not to submit a statement on his own behalf.
7. Subsequent to the applicant's acknowledgement of this notification, his immediate commander initiated separation action against him in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct.
8. On 7 August 2008, his intermediate commander recommended approval of the discharge action with the issuance of a general discharge.
9. On 7 August 2008, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge ordered the applicant discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 15 August 2008, the applicant was accordingly discharged.
10. His records show he was awarded or authorized the National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, and Army Service Ribbon.
11. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 with a character of service as under honorable conditions (general). This form further shows he completed 8 months and 24 days of creditable active service. Item 26 (Separation Code) of this form shows the entry "JKD" and item 27 (Reentry Code) shows the entry "3."
12. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and convictions by civil authorities. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it was clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. However, the separation authority may direct a general discharge if such is merited by the Soldier's overall record. Only a general court-martial convening authority may approve an honorable discharge or delegate approval authority for an honorable discharge under this provision of the regulation.
13. Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard. It states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Table 3-1 includes a list of the Regular Army RE codes. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met. RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable. They are ineligible unless a waiver is granted.
14. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) states that SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations which identify reasons for and types of separation from active duty. The "JKD" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under paragraph 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of misconduct for commission of a serious offense.
15. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table provides instructions for determining the RE code for Active Army and Reserve Component Soldiers. This cross reference table shows the SPD code and its corresponding RE code. The table in effect at the time of his discharge shows the SPD code of "JKD" has a corresponding RE code of "3."
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant requests that his RE code be changed from RE-3 so he can reenter military service.
2. The evidence of record confirms his RE code was assigned based on his discharge under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 due to his commission of a serious offense (AWOL). Absent the commission of this offense, there was no fundamental reason to process him for discharge. The underlying reason for his discharge was his commission of a serious offense and the only valid narrative reason for separation permitted under that provision is "misconduct - commission of a serious offense." The appropriate RE code associated with this discharge is an RE-3 which is correctly shown on his DD Form 214. Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief.
3. The Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits. The applicant is advised that if he desires to enlist, he should contact a local recruiter who can best advise him on his eligibility for returning to military service. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may process enlistment waivers for the applicant's RE code.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ____X___ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________X_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100014458
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100014458
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010638
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 15 March 2005, the Commander, United States Army Garrison, Fort Richardson, Alaska, recommended that the applicant be separated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), for the wrongful use of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015433
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 April 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130015433 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021236
Throughout his time in the military he never had any disciplinary actions. However, his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged under honorable conditions (general) on 4 October 2012 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12c(1), for misconduct (AWOL). On 12 August 2013, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010874C070208
The discharge authority reviewed the discharge packet and directed that the applicant be separated with a general discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c - misconduct. The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) requesting a correction of the reason and characterization of his service. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018880
On 4 June 2008, the applicant's commanding officer informed him that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 14 (Separation for misconduct), paragraph 14-12c (Commission of a serious offense). The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of "4" is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals separated for this reason. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002134
On 13 July 2006, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, by reason of misconduct - commission of a serious offense and directed his service be characterized as general under honorable conditions. SPD code "JKQ" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense (illegal drugs). His...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014434
On 13 December 2007, the applicants immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct, commission of a serious offense, based on two periods of AWOL with one period exceeding 30 days. The evidence of record shows that the applicants RE code was assigned because he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004087
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 16 June 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense) for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 (081228) for deserting the Army with the intent to not return. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, and the issues submitted with the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003699
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for going AWOL (081028-081103 and 080902-080909) stealing the cell phone of another Soldier, punching her in her jaw, and failure to report to his appointed place of duty on several occasions,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001433
On 7 March 2008, the separation authority approved the applicants discharge under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of misconduct abuse of illegal drugs and directed the applicant be furnished a general discharge. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of...