Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014076
Original file (20100014076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100014076 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 23 July 1974 to show he entered active duty on 6 May 1968.

2.  The applicant states the first two years of his service are not reflected on his DD Form 214; the entry date should be 6 May 1968.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending
23 July 1974.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 6 May 1968 for a period of 3 years.  He was honorably discharged on 23 July 1970 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued at the time shows he completed 2 years, 2 months, and 19 days (sic - should be 18 days) of total active service.

3.  His records also show he reenlisted in the RA on 24 July 1970 for a period of 4 years.  He was honorably discharged on 23 July 1974.  The DD Form 214 he was issued this period shows the following entries:

* Item 9d (Effective Date) shows "74  07  23"
* Item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) shows "70  07  24"
* Item 18a (Net Active Service This Period) shows "04  00  00"
* Item 18b (Total Prior Active Service) shows "02  02  18"
* Item 18c (Total Active Service) shows "06  02  18"
 
4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service.  Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states:

* Item 9d shows the date the Soldier’s separation was accomplished
* Item 15 (for enlisted personnel) shows the date the Soldier entered active duty or the date enlistment or reenlistment was accomplished
* Item 18a shows the net active service completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214
* Item 18b shows the total prior active service
* Item 18c shows the total active service completed by the Soldier

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the date he initially entered active duty was carefully considered.

2.  His records show he initially enlisted in the RA on 6 May 1968 and he was discharged on 23 July 1970.  He then reenlisted in the RA on 24 July 1970 and he was discharged on 23 July 1974.  As required by applicable regulations at the time, he was issued a separate DD Form 214 that captured each period of active service.  A copy of this DD Form 214 will be provided to him.

3.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  Consolidation of two or more periods of service into one DD Form 214 was not authorized during the periods referenced.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 correctly reflects his record of service and contains no errors.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014076



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014076



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010197

    Original file (20110010197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued for this period of service shows he completed 1 year, 11 months, and 7 days of active service. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 2 years and 9 months of active service during this period. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003169

    Original file (20130003169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) with an effective date of 10 September 1979 be corrected to show his correct dates of active service. The applicant provides his: * DD Form 214 with an effective date of 10 September 1979 * General Discharge Certificate, dated 10 September 1979 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 9d (Effective Date) contains the entry "75 04 28" or 28 April 1975. c. Item 18a (Net Active Service This Period) contains the entry "0...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002455C070206

    Original file (20050002455C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Linda M. Barker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show his correct dates of service. The DD Form 256A will be prepared and given to Soldiers who are honorably discharged at the completion of their statutory military service obligation or when they are discharged from service, whichever comes first.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017799

    Original file (20090017799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests item 9d (Effective Date) of his initial DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show 25 May 1978 instead of 20 April 1978. The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) includes a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) prepared during his initial enlistment processing. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 by amending item 15 to show an active duty entry date of 25 August 1975 and to amend the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013755

    Original file (20100013755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 214 for this period of service is also not available for review with this case. With the exception of his first enlistment and first reenlistment, his records contain a DD Form 214 that captured his active service for each period of reenlistment as well as any prior active service he had completed. The FSM’s retirement DD Form 214 correctly reflects his record of service and contains no errors.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001777

    Original file (20110001777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his date of entry on active duty as 16 June 1971. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 7 June 1977 and a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 15 March 1978. The applicant's DD Form 214 correctly reflects his record of service and contains no errors.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010976.

    Original file (20090010976..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 9d (Effective Date) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). Item 9d on the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "79 08 17" [17 August 1979]. Evidence of record shows the applicant was ordered to active duty on 10 August 1979.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025724

    Original file (20100025724.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. On 29 March 1978, RCPAC issued an AGUZ Form 115 documenting the applicant's retirement points for the period 6 January 1977 through 5 January 1978 and it shows he served on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014212

    Original file (20080014212.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows that the applicant was on active duty during two separate periods of service. Evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in pay grade E-1 and was subsequently discharged in the same grade. There is no evidence that shows the applicant was ever advanced beyond the grade of E-1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007740

    Original file (20100007740.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He was issued a DD Form 214 which shows, in Item 15, the date 17 January 1972. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending Item 15 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 October 1974 to show he entered on active duty on 17 January 1971.