Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010976.
Original file (20090010976..txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  8 December 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090010976 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 9d (Effective Date) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the DD Form 214 shows conflicting dates for time served on active duty.  He points out that item 18a (Net Active Service This Period) of his DD Form 214 shows he served 8 days, item 18b (Prior Active Service) shows he served 4 month and 3 days of prior active service, and item 18c (Total Active Service) shows he served 4 months and 11 days.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored letter, dated 24 June 2009; a letter from the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, MO, dated 15 July 1003; his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 9 August 1979; and the DD Form 214 in question in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Georgia Army National Guard (GAARNG) on
23 August 1977 for a period of 6 years.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was ordered to active duty for training in 1978 for a period of 123 days.  On 9 August 1979, he was discharged from the GAARNG due to being ordered to involuntary active duty.

3.  The applicant was ordered to active duty on 10 August 1979.  On 14 August 1979, he requested discharge for physical disability (a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) found him unfit for retention in the military service by reason of physical disability which was found to have existed prior to his enlistment).  He was honorably discharged effective 17 August 1979.

4.  Item 9d on the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "79 08 17" 
[17 August 1979].  Item 18a (Net Active Service This Period) on his DD Form 214 shows the entry "00 00 08 [8 days].  Item 18b (Prior Active Service) on his DD Form 214 shows the entry "00 04 03" [4 months and 3 days].  Item 18c on his DD Form 214 shows the entry "00 04 11" [4 months and 11 days].

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated that for item 18 (Record of Service) all service shown in 18(a) through (f) will be less time lost under Title 10 (U.s. Code, section 972 and time lost subsequent to expiration of term of service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence of record shows the applicant was ordered to active duty on
10 August 1979.  Evidence of record also shows he was discharged effective 
17 August 1979, which is properly reflected in item 9d of his DD Form 214.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend item 9d of his DD Form 214.

2.  The evidence of record supports the applicant's contention that he served 
4 months and 11 days of active duty.  Item 18a of his DD Form 214 shows he served 8 days (10 August 1979 to 17 August 1979) and item 18b shows his prior 

active service (123 days of active duty for training in 1978), for a total of
4 months and 11 days which is properly reflected in item 18c of his DD Form 214.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010976



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010976



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003169

    Original file (20130003169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) with an effective date of 10 September 1979 be corrected to show his correct dates of active service. The applicant provides his: * DD Form 214 with an effective date of 10 September 1979 * General Discharge Certificate, dated 10 September 1979 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 9d (Effective Date) contains the entry "75 04 28" or 28 April 1975. c. Item 18a (Net Active Service This Period) contains the entry "0...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001777

    Original file (20110001777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his date of entry on active duty as 16 June 1971. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 7 June 1977 and a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 15 March 1978. The applicant's DD Form 214 correctly reflects his record of service and contains no errors.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017799

    Original file (20090017799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests item 9d (Effective Date) of his initial DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show 25 May 1978 instead of 20 April 1978. The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) includes a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) prepared during his initial enlistment processing. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 by amending item 15 to show an active duty entry date of 25 August 1975 and to amend the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025724

    Original file (20100025724.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. On 29 March 1978, RCPAC issued an AGUZ Form 115 documenting the applicant's retirement points for the period 6 January 1977 through 5 January 1978 and it shows he served on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010197

    Original file (20110010197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued for this period of service shows he completed 1 year, 11 months, and 7 days of active service. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 2 years and 9 months of active service during this period. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013981

    Original file (20110013981.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * his DD Form 214 with separation date of 31 January 1995 * his orders, dated 4 November 1974, for his enlistment * Item 35 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Based on his DD Form 4, dated 4 November 1974, the date in item 15 of his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 30 August 1977 is incorrect. 04 01 28 (item 18c) + 00 00 26 (corrected item 18d) 04 02 24 (total) Therefore, the entry in item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003638C070206

    Original file (20050003638C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 9d (Effective Date/Year/Month/ Day) be corrected to show the entry "76 10 01' (1 October 1976) instead of the entry "76 09 27" (27 September 1976), that item 18a (Record of Service/Net Active Service This Period) be corrected to show the entry "02 00 00" (2 years) instead of the entry "01 11 26" (1 year, 11 months, and 26 days) and item 18c (Record of Service/Total Active Service) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation From Active Duty)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006740

    Original file (20120006740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Although the applicant remained a member of the ARARNG until 9 March 1981 and a member of the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) until 21 September 1984, his record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013755

    Original file (20100013755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 214 for this period of service is also not available for review with this case. With the exception of his first enlistment and first reenlistment, his records contain a DD Form 214 that captured his active service for each period of reenlistment as well as any prior active service he had completed. The FSM’s retirement DD Form 214 correctly reflects his record of service and contains no errors.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003400

    Original file (20140003400.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) as follows: * item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) to show 29 January 1975 vice 25 June 1975 * item 18f (Foreign and/or Sea Service This Period) to add his service from 15 January 1979 to 28 February 1979 in support of the Return of Forces to Germany (REFORGER) Exercise * item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or...