Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013960
Original file (20100013960.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 
		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013960 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to state he was discharged for a disability incurred during his military service. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was not provided hearing protection and as a result his ears were damaged on the firing range.  He further states after numerous examinations by civilian and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) doctors, the VA has determined he is 60 percent disabled due to service-connected ear injuries. 

3.  The applicant provides documents through counsel.

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

1.  Counsel requests that the applicant's military discharge documents be changed.

2.  Counsel makes no statement. 

3.  Counsel provides documents identified in a list submitted with his application.





CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  This case is being considered using a DD Form 214 in his reconstructed NPRC file.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 November 1950.  He was honorably discharged on 12 January 1951 after completing 1 month and 26 days of active military service.

4.  His DD Form 214 shows in item 8 (Reason and Authority for Separation) he was discharged under the provision of Army Regulation 615-360-40.  Item 38 (Remarks) contains the statement "For the convenience of the Government-Disability existing prior to entry on active service and not aggravated by Military Service."

5.  In a statement to the VA, dated 23 December 2006, the applicant stated his ears were injured on a shooting range during boot camp by rifle fire from two other recruits whose rifles were positioned 12 inches on either side of his head.  While shooting, he heard a pop in his head and later found out both of his eardrums had ruptured.  He went to sick call 2 or 3 days later and after two or three visits to the doctor he was told he was going to be sent home with an honorable discharge.  He further states when he signed his DD Form 214 he was not aware it stated his injury was not caused while serving in the Army.  

6.  The documents that the applicant provided to the VA included five statements, dated 11 December 2006, from individuals who knew him prior to his Army service.  Each statement indicates, in effect, the applicant did not have medical issues with his ears prior to serving in the Army.
7.  Counsel provides a VA rating decision, dated 5 February 2010, showing the applicant was granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss and bilateral tinnitus with a combined rating for compensation of 60 percent.  The VA documents explaining the rating decision show the applicant's service treatment records were not available for review and that service connection was granted based on reasonable doubt.

8.  Special Regulations 615-360-40 (Disposition of Individuals with Physical or Mental Disability which Existed Prior to Entry on Active Service), in effect at the time, provided that individuals who were unfit for military service because of a physical or mental disability such that they would not meet the physical or mental requirements for enlistment or induction into the services were candidates for separation or retirement:

	a.  Individuals whose physical or mental disability was clearly established by proper medical authority to have existed prior to entry on active service could elect to submit an application for immediate discharge for the convenience of the Government, provided that 1) they had no prior service in any of the Armed Forces; 2) they had less than 6 months' service in their initial enlistment at the time the physical disability was discovered; and 3) the physical disability was not aggravated by military service. 

	b.  Upon receipt of the application by the individual's commanding officer, action was to be initiated to bring the individual before a medical board for consideration of the appropriate disposition.  If the medical board found the disability existed prior to entry on active duty and was not aggravated by military service and recommended discharge of the individual for the convenience of the Government, the findings and recommendations, together with the individual's application, were to be referred to the commander exercising discharge authority.

	c.  All discharge certificates executed under the provisions of these regulations were to show the specific cause for discharge as "For the convenience of the government--Disability existing prior to entry on active service and not aggravated by military service."

9.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) states the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was discharged for a disability incurred during his military service.

2.  The evidence of record does not show, nor has the applicant provided evidence showing, the reason and authority for his discharge are incorrect.  A 2010 VA rating decision based on reasonable doubt and statements made in 2006 by individuals claiming to have known the applicant prior to his military service are insufficient for changing an Army record created more than 50 years ago.  In the absence of documentation showing errors in the process leading to the applicant's discharge, administrative regularity must be presumed.  

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the requested relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013960



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013960



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017976

    Original file (20070017976.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070017976 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states the recommendation by a military physician who wrote his clinical abstract, that he be separated from active duty under the provisions of SR 615-360-40, should have been accepted. SR 615-450-10,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007630

    Original file (20120007630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The chlorine caused his eyes to close-up while he was learning to swim and his eyes could have been corrected; b. he volunteered for the service, he needed the service, and he still needs it; and c. his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) shows he was discharged "for the Convenience of the Government." The only record available to the Board was the DD Form 214 provided by the applicant, which was signed by him. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009252

    Original file (20130009252.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military service records are not available to the Board for review. However, his partial reconstructed record and his DD Form 214 offer sufficient evidence for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case. Army Regulation 615-360, in effect at the time, provided that an honorable discharge certificate would be furnished when the individual had character ratings of at least "very good," had efficiency ratings of at least "excellent," had not been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010117C070208

    Original file (20040010117C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his hearing and physical condition was “A-1” when he entered the Army in 1943 and that he now needs his 1943 discharge corrected to show that he incurred a severe hearing loss “in service with the 194th Glider Infantry at the side of heavy artillery firing July 24, 1943 in World War 2.” He states that his records reflect false information, which the Department of Veterans Affairs has used to deny him benefits for 59 years. His overall physical condition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015258

    Original file (20140015258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 8 (Reason and Authority for Separation) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States). The applicant states: a. item 8 of his DD Form 214 incorrectly shows he was discharged from active duty by reason of "medical disqualification [existed prior to entry (EPTE)] on active service and not aggravated by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018063

    Original file (20130018063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years of service and a disability rated at less than 30 percent. There is no available evidence and he did not provide sufficient evidence showing he was found unfit to perform his military duties at the time.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050011770

    Original file (20050011770.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's separation document shows he was inducted into the Army and entered active duty on 20 November 1942, and that he served until 16 October 1943, at which time he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Section II, Army Regulation 615-360, by reason of disability. The applicant's contention that the reason for discharge outlined in the OTSG Hospital Admission Record on file is not consistent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009794C070208

    Original file (20040009794C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his honorable discharge (HD) be corrected to show that he was separated due to medical reasons. It was the opinion of the board that the applicant was unfit for further military service in both an active and limited capacity; therefore the board recommended that the applicant be separated. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 27 September 1943; therefore, the time for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000559C070208

    Original file (20040000559C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence shows that the applicant was discharged within 120 days of his ETS upon his return from overseas in accordance with the regulations in effect at the time. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 16 June 1950, the date of his discharge; therefore, the time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610714C070209

    Original file (9610714C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. The board recommend that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-360 on account of habits and traits of character which rendered his retention in the service undesirable, and disqualified in character for service, through his own misconduct. 56 (Discharge from the Army...