BOARD DATE: 7 February 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120007630 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests the narrative reason for his discharge be changed from the convenience of the Government to a medical discharge. 2. He states, in effect: a. his discharge action was mishandled. While he was in Tripler Army Hospital in Hawaii in November 1951 he was coerced into signing a paper to agreeing to be discharged because he had an eye infection from chlorine. The chlorine caused his eyes to close-up while he was learning to swim and his eyes could have been corrected; b. he volunteered for the service, he needed the service, and he still needs it; and c. his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) shows he was discharged "for the Convenience of the Government." He was a cook by trade and he wanted a job cooking, but the Army refused him. 3. He provides his DD Form 214. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant's military personnel records were not available and may have been lost or destroyed in a fire at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. The only record available to the Board was the DD Form 214 provided by the applicant, which was signed by him. 3. His DD Form 214 shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 July 1951 for a period of 3 years. He completed 3 months and 12 days of foreign service. 4. On 5 January 1952, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Special Regulation 615-360 (Enlisted Men Discharge: Release from Active Duty) for the Convenience of the Government by reason of physical disability existing prior to entry on active service and not aggravated by military service. He completed 5 months and 5 days of creditable active service. 5. His service record is void of and he did not provide any medical documentation. 6. Special Regulation 615-360 in effect at the time, stated enlisted men would be discharged for the convenience of the Government by authority of the Secretary of War only. Such authority would be given either in each individual case or by an order application to all cases of a class specified in the order. 7. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. The unfitness must be of such a degree that a Soldier is unable to perform the duties of his/her office, grade, rank, or rating in such a way as to reasonably fulfill the purposes of his/her employment on active duty. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The available records do not include any evidence which supports the applicant's contentions regarding his eye infection or that he was coerced into signing his discharge paper. 2. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged for the Convenience of the Government by reason of physical disability existing prior to entry into active service and not aggravated by military service. 3. The available evidence is void of facts and circumstances pertaining to the events which led to his discharge. However, he provided a DD Form 214 signed by him that documents the characterization and reason for the discharge. Absent evidence to the contrary, especially after the passage of 60 years, regularity in the discharge process must be presumed. 4. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant granting the applicant's requested relief. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING __x___ ___x_____ ___x_____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120007630 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120007630 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1