Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013888
Original file (20100013888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013888 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Legion of Merit.

2.  The applicant states:

* He retired on 31 July 1990
* His DD Form 214 was prepared approximately 1 month before he retired
* The Legion of Merit was awarded to him after his DD Form 214 was finalized
* He has the original award, but he has no orders awarding him the Legion of Merit

3.  The applicant provides a certificate showing he was awarded the Legion of Merit.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 

provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 October 1966.  He was subsequently commissioned as a second lieutenant upon successful completion of the Officer Candidate School.  He advanced through the officer ranks while serving in various positions and duty stations.  After completing 24 years, 8 months, and 22 days of total active service, he retired from the Army in the rank/grade of lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O-5.

3.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 he was issued does not show the Legion of Merit.

4.  There are no orders in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) awarding him the Legion of Merit.

5.  The applicant provides a Legion of Merit award certificate, dated 18 May 1990, showing he was awarded the Legion of Merit for exceptionally meritorious service from 31 July 1980 to 31 July 1990.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Legion of Merit is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding services and achievements.  The performance must merit recognition of key individuals for service rendered in a clearly exceptional manner.  Performance of duties normal to the grade, branch, specialty, or assignment and experience of an individual is not an adequate basis for this award.  In peacetime, service should be in the nature of a special requirement or an extremely difficult duty performed in an unprecedented and clearly exceptional manner.  However, justification may accrue by virtue of exceptionally meritorious service in a succession of important positions.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.  However, there are no orders in his OMPF and the applicant did not provide a copy of the orders awarding him the Legion of Merit.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013888



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013888



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006979

    Original file (20130006979.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 does not show the LOM or DMSM as authorized awards. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the LOM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding services and achievements. In the absence of orders, the photographs of the LOM provided by the applicant alone are not sufficient as a basis for adding this award to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020743

    Original file (20100020743.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a DA Form 4980-11 showing he was awarded the LOM for exceptionally meritorious service from 1 November 1990 to 31 October 2000. The applicant provided no orders for this award, and none could be found in the applicant's service records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the LOM and KDSM to his retirement DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014176

    Original file (20130014176.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) for the award of the Legion of Merit. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Legion of Merit is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding services and achievements. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003806

    Original file (20090003806.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states, in pertinent part, that the Legion of Merit is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding services and achievements. In the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to award the applicant the Legion of Merit. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021755

    Original file (20140021755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Legion of Merit (LOM). He did receive four Meritorious Service Medals throughout his 22 years of active duty service. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003259

    Original file (20130003259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the LOM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding services and achievements. There are no orders and he did not provide any orders awarding him the LOM. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000847

    Original file (20100000847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was recommended for or awarded the Legion of Merit. There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was recommended for or awarded the Legion of Merit. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001076C070205

    Original file (20060001076C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant was awarded the Legion of Merit (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service for the period April 1972 to February 1973. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was awarded a second award of the Legion of Merit (i.e., Legion of Merit (1st Oak Leaf Cluster)) for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service for the period April 1972...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018769

    Original file (20080018769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant’s personnel records which shows that the applicant was recommended for or awarded the Legion of Merit. No evidence was found in the applicant's service personnel record to show he was awarded the Legion of Merit; therefore, there is insufficient evidence available to support addition of this award to his DD Form 214. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018665

    Original file (20110018665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Further, his retirement award was downgraded from a Legion of Merit to a Meritorious Service Medal and he would like his record corrected.