Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003806
Original file (20090003806.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       28 JULY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003806 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Legion of Merit. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 does not list this award.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a certificate, dated 30 December 1999, that shows he was awarded the Legion of Merit.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant is a retired master sergeant (MSG) who initially entered active service on 25 November 1975 and served in various staff and leadership positions within and outside continental United States.  He was honorably released from active duty on 29 February 2000 and placed on the retired list in his retired rank/grade of MSG/E-8 on 1 March 2000.  He was credited with over 24 years of faithful service. 

3.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal (4th Award), the Army Achievement Medal (3rd Award), the Lapel Button, the Good Conduct Medal (8th Award), the National Defense Service Medal, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, the Southwest Asia Service Medal with a bronze service star, the Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon with Numeral 3, the Army Service Ribbon, the Overseas Service Ribbon (3rd Award), the Kuwait Liberation Medal (K and SA), and the Army Recruiter Badge.  Item 24 does not show award of the Legion of Merit.

4.  The applicant submitted a copy of a certificate, dated 30 December 1999, that shows he was awarded the Legion of Merit for meritorious service from 2 March 1990 to 1 March 2000.

5.  The applicant’s records do not contain permanent orders that show he was awarded the Legion of Merit.

6.  The case analyst of record attempted to contact the applicant and verify if he has a copy of the permanent orders; however, the applicant did not list a phone number or an email address.  

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states, in pertinent part, that the Legion of Merit is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding services and achievements.  The performance must merit recognition of key individuals for service rendered in a clearly exceptional manner.  Performance of duties normal to the grade, branch, specialty or assignment and experience of an individual is not an adequate basis for this award.  In peacetime, service should be in the nature of a special requirement or an extremely difficult duty performed in an unprecedented and clearly exceptional manner.  However, justification may accrue by virtue of exceptionally meritorious service in a succession of important positions.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval 
through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required. Recommendations must be made within 2 years of the event or period of service and the award must be made within 3 years.  There are regulatory provisions for lost recommendations but not for late recommendations, reconsideration, nor for upgrading to a more prestigious award.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Legion of Merit.

2.  There is no evidence in the available records of the award of the Legion of Merit other than the certificate submitted by the applicant.  Army regulation states that for personal decorations, formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command, and announcement of orders are required.  In the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to award the applicant the Legion of Merit.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __XXX_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003806



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003806



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015384

    Original file (20070015384.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document shows that the applicant was awarded the Legion of Merit for exceptionally meritorious service from 1 May 1995 to 31 March 2005. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Legion of Merit for exceptionally meritorious service from 1 May 1995 to 31 March 2005 and that Headquarters, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Permanent Orders 351-2, dated 16 December 2004, announced award of the Legion of Merit to the applicant. The evidence of record also shows that the Legion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014076

    Original file (20070014076.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records do not contain orders showing he was awarded a second award of the Legion of Merit. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Legion of Merit on 9 May 2005 for meritorious service from October 1995 to September 2005 and that this award is shown on his DD Form 214. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was awarded a second award of the Legion of Merit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016086

    Original file (20130016086.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he served in Korea during a qualifying period for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal. Therefore, he is authorized award of the Korea Defense Service Medal and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding award of the Legion of Merit, Army Good Conduct Medal (6th Award), and Korea Defense Service Medal to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091776C070212

    Original file (2003091776C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was promoted to master sergeant (MSG/E-8) and awarded the Legion of Merit (LOM) as a retirement award. For meritorious service awards at retirement, this paragraph also permits inclusion of service longer than that served within the command recommending the award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014351

    Original file (20140014351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, she provides an LOM Certificate dated 13 March 1992 showing she was awarded the LOM for meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service during the period 1 April 1981 to 31 March 1992 and that her performance reflected great credit on the U.S. Health Services Command. Each individual approaching retirement may be considered for an appropriate decoration based on his or her grade, years of service, degree of responsibility, and manner of performance. Meritorious...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000847

    Original file (20100000847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was recommended for or awarded the Legion of Merit. There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was recommended for or awarded the Legion of Merit. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000449C070206

    Original file (20050000449C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Legion of Merit. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states, in pertinent part, that the Legion of Merit is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding services and achievements. The DA Form 638 shows she was awarded the Legion of Merit for exceptionally meritorious service from 1 October 1994 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001597

    Original file (20090001597.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Legion of Merit. The applicant provides a copy of a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) and a certificate, dated 21 August 2008, and a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 31 August 2008, in support of his request. ___________XXX______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023332

    Original file (20100023332.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Legion of Merit, four awards of the Meritorious Service Medal, and to show her home of record (HOR) as "Tennessee" vice "Alaska." The applicant's records show she was appointed a second lieutenant (2LT) in the USAR on 22 August 1974. Department of the Army, U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel Administration Center, St. Louis, MO, Letter Orders Number A-08-76520, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021137

    Original file (20110021137.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On the other hand, he submits a personal letter from the General Officer who certifies this award as well as a photograph of the same General Officer presenting him the Legion of Merit (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) in September 1976. c. It appears the 1974 downgraded Legion of Merit was not related to the requested 1976 Legion of Merit. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...