BOARD DATE: 9 November 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100013253
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect his rank/grade at the time of discharge as private first class (PFC)/E-3 instead of private (PVT)/E-1.
2. The applicant states when he was separated his pay grade was E-3 but his DD Form 214 shows E-1.
3. The applicant provided no additional evidence.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 13 September 2005 in the rank/grade of PVT/E-1. On 4 October 2005, he was ordered to initial active duty for training at Fort Leonard Wood, MO for basic combat and advanced individual training.
3. On 18 October 2006, while still in basic training, he was notified by his immediate commander that discharge action was being initiated against him under the provisions of chapter 13 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) for unsatisfactory performance with an honorable discharge. The commander cited his inability to pass the Army Physical Fitness Test on 21 occasions and failure to meet training requirements as the bases for the action. The notification listed his rank as PVT.
4. On 18 October 2006, the applicant acknowledged notification of the proposed discharge action by signing the document in the appropriate block. He declined to consult with legal counsel and he was advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action; the effect on future enlistment in the Army; the possible effects of a general discharge; and of the procedures and rights that were available to him. He voluntarily consented to this discharge.
5. On 20 October 2006, his chain of command recommended that he be separated under the provisions of chapter 13 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of unsatisfactory performance. The commander noted all rehabilitation attempts within the company and numerous counseling attempts resulted in failure. His rank was listed as PVT.
6. On 23 October 2006, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13 with an honorable discharge. His rank was listed as PVT. On 1 November 2006, he was discharged accordingly. The DD Form 214 he was issued confirms he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, by reason of unsatisfactory performance with an honorable discharge.
7. Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) of his DD Form 214 shows PV1 and item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) shows 13 September 2005. He authenticated this form by placing his signature in the appropriate block.
8. There are no promotion orders in his record to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of private (PV2)/E-2 or PFC/E-3.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) prescribes the qualifications and requirements for enlisted promotions. It states, in pertinent part, that promotions to PV2 and PFC will be made automatically by the Total Army Personnel database except for Soldiers on initial active duty for training.
Training promotions may be made as follows: Upon completion of basic combat training, commanders may advance up to10 percent of each companys assigned PV1s to PV2 and PV2s to PFC without regard to the time in service and time in grade requirements.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank/grade as PFC/E-3. There is insufficient evidence to support this contention.
2. The evidence of record shows at the time of his discharge on 1 November 2006, he held the rank/grade of PVT/E-1. His record is void of any promotion orders to PV2/E-2 or PFC/E-3. In addition, in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-19, as he had not completed basic combat training he was ineligible to be promoted to PV2/E-2. Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__x____ ___x_____ ___x_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ x _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100013253
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100013253
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008826
The applicant requests, in effect, correction to her records to show she was promoted to the rank of specialist (SPC), pay grade E-4, and is entitled to back pay and allowances as a result of her promotion to pay grade E-4. The applicant submitted a copy of a DA Form 4187, dated 2 March 2007, showing her advancement/promotion to pay grade E-4 under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 2-3, with an effective date and date of rank of 20...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013457
There is no indication in the applicants records that he was advanced beyond the rank/grade of PV2/E-2 during his active military service. Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicants DA Form 2-1 shows the applicants ranks and dates of rank as follows: PVT/E-1, 9 May 1977; PV2/E-2, 10 November 1977; PVT/E-1, 7 March 1978; PV2/E-2, 1 March 1979; PVT/E-1, 28 September 1979; and PV2/E-2, 17 March 1980. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show he completed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006658C070205
The applicant states, in effect, that his pay grade on his DD Form 214 is incorrect and it reads pay grade, E-1; however, it should state a pay grade of E-2. The rank on the Article 15 should have read PFC/E-3 and punishment should have read reduction to pay grade E-2. The evidence of records shows that the applicant was advanced to pay grade E-3 effective 23 April 2001.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012128
SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 January 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070012128 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. His LES show the following: DAY/Month/Year Grade Paid on his LES 1-31 January 2001 E-2 1-28 February 2001 E-2 1-31 March 2001 E-2 1-30 April 2001 E-2 1-31 May 2001 E-2 1-30 June 2001 E-2 1-30 July 2001...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018093
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 12 November 1999, the applicant's immediate commander again dispatched a letter of instruction to the applicant informing him that he was absent from scheduled MUTA on 6 November 1999 and 7 November 1999. The record of unsatisfactory participation is correctly filed in his record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001195
The evidence of record shows he was reduced to PVT/E-1 on 2 February 1998 as a result of NJP. At the time the DA Form 4187 was prepared the applicant's rank was PVT/E-1. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting item 14 of his DD Form 214 to show he successfully completed AIT and he was awarded MOS 92A or that he was discharged in the rank of PFC/E-3.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015624
Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicants DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), dated 18 October 1974 (prepared), shows the applicants promotions and reductions. The active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation is entered in Item 6a and the effective date of promotion to the current pay grade (from the most recent promotion or reduction order) is entered in Item 6b. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010462
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016269
On 24 October 1983, he was notified by his immediate commander that discharge action was being initiated against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5 by reason of a personality disorder diagnosed by a competent medical authority. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his grade as E-5, dates of service from 1981 to 1984, MOS as 91B2O, Parachutist Badge, and reason for separation as something...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013459
The applicant requests the following corrections be made to his military records: a. restoration to the rank and pay grade of private (PV2)/E-2 from the period 1 September 1978 to 21 September 1979, b. refund of all pay forfeited as a result of his sentencing and reduction in grade, c. promotion consideration to the grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3, d. promotion consideration to the grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 prior to his separation on 21 September 1979, and e. payment of all due...