Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010462
Original file (20110010462.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110010462 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change his rank/pay grade.  

2.  He states he transferred from one new unit to another new unit.  He contends both units were disorganized and personnel were not properly trained.  These errors affect his current eligibility to enlist and receive benefits for schooling.

3.  He provides: 

* A DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 September 2005
* A DD Form 214 for the period ending 23 February 2006
* An advancement to Specialist (SPC)/E-4 document
* An extract of his medical readiness record

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 27 August 2004 in the grade of private (PVT)/E-1.  

3.  His record contains a DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) which shows he was advanced to the grade of PVT/E-2 on 21 April 2005.

4.  He provided a DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 September 2005 that shows he was released from active duty training.  This document shows "PV1" in item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and "E-1" in item 4b (Pay Grade).  Item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) shows "2004 08 27."

5.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 23 February 2006 shows he completed 5 months and 26 days of active duty for special work.  Item 4a shows his rank as "PV1" and item 4b shows "E-1" as his pay grade.  Item 12h shows the effective date as "2005 02 10."

6.  His record contains a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) for advancement to Private First Class (PFC)/E-3 effective 10 August 2006.

7.  The applicant provided a DA Form 4187 for advancement to SPC/E-4 effective 15 December 2006.  

8.  A review of his records also shows he was issued a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) on 26 August 2010 after completion of his commitment in the Selected Reserve.  His rank/pay grade on this form is shown as SPC/E-4.   

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows he advanced to PFC/E-3 on 12 August 2006 and to SPC/E-4 on 15 December 2006.  Both advancements occurred after the ending periods of both DD Forms 214 and therefore he is not entitled to have either of these grade levels placed on his DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant's record shows he was advanced to PVT/E-2 on 21 April 2005.  As a result, he is entitled to have both DD Forms 214 corrected to show his rank as "PV2" and his pay grade to show "E-2." 



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Forms 214 for the period ending 1 September 2005 and 
23 February 2006 as follows:

	a.  Item 4a – deleting "PV1" and replacing it with "PV2";

	b.  Item 4b – deleting "E-1" and replacing it with "E-2"; and

	c.  Item 12h – deleting "2004 08 27" and 2005 02 10" and replacing them with "2005 04 21." 

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his records to show a rank/pay grade higher than "PV2/E-2."  




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010462





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010462



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019880

    Original file (20110019880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110019880 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He states his DD Form 214 is in error because item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) shows the correct date he was promoted to SPC/E-4. Accordingly, he was retired on 10 April 2009 in the grade of PVT/E-1 (item 12h incorrectly shows the effective date of pay grade as 1 July 2008).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001195

    Original file (20110001195.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he was reduced to PVT/E-1 on 2 February 1998 as a result of NJP. At the time the DA Form 4187 was prepared the applicant's rank was PVT/E-1. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting item 14 of his DD Form 214 to show he successfully completed AIT and he was awarded MOS 92A or that he was discharged in the rank of PFC/E-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006840

    Original file (20140006840.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), 4b (Pay Grade), and 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 28 November 2005. The applicant provides: * three DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017453

    Original file (20100017453.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Item 4a of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "PV1" [private 1]. Records from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) show his pay grades as: * Pay grade E-1 from 30 December 2004 through 29 June 2005 * Pay grade E-2 from 30 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006658C070205

    Original file (20060006658C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his pay grade on his DD Form 214 is incorrect and it reads pay grade, E-1; however, it should state a pay grade of E-2. The rank on the Article 15 should have read PFC/E-3 and punishment should have read reduction to pay grade E-2. The evidence of records shows that the applicant was advanced to pay grade E-3 effective 23 April 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021885

    Original file (20100021885.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: * Items 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) to show his rank/grade as private (PV2)/E-2 * Item 12f (Foreign Service) to show his service in Southwest Asia 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. Additionally, most personnel documents in his service records show he served as a PVT or PV1/E-1 throughout his military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009585

    Original file (20080009585.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to private (PV2)/E-2 from 18 July 2007 to 18 July 2001. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows that the applicant entered active duty on 18 January 2001 and was advanced to PV2/E-2 on 18 July 2001. Therefore, the applicant's DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his correct DOR to PV2/E-2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012844

    Original file (20120012844.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 4 May 2004 to show his rank and pay grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4. His DD Form 214 for the period ending 2 August 2002 shows in: * item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – the entry "PFC" * item 4b (Pay Grade) – the entry "E3" * Item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019074

    Original file (20080019074.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his records show he did not complete 55D MOS training and was reassigned to Fort Bliss, TX, where he completed training for MOS 14J (Early Warning System Operator). When the commander denies promotion, he or she may promote the Soldier on the next automated Enlisted Advancement Report, provided the Soldier is otherwise qualified. By regulation, he should have been automatically advanced to PV2 six months after his entry on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007890

    Original file (20110007890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 10 November 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110007890 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to properly show his rank/grade as SPC/E-4 with a date of rank of 29 March 2007.