IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 27 January 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100013069
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, his discharge date be corrected to show
30 November 1990 and his twice nonselection for promotion to Major be expunged from his record.
2. The applicant states he requested a complete resignation/break in service in order to work in Uzbekistan. He believed he had been discharged from the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG) on 30 November 1990. Subsequently, in 2006, he requested to be re-commissioned. He inquired about his date of rank in 2008 and it was then that he discovered he had been passed over for promotion to Major in 1994 and 1995, during the time he was living in Uzbekistan.
3. The applicant provides a letter of support from his commander and his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. After having had over 7 years of prior service, the applicant was appointed in the INARNG, Armor Branch, as a captain, effective 10 September 1988.
3. On 25 August 1990, he requested resignation with an effective date of
1 December 1990. The record is void of an approval or disapproval document.
4. Military Department of Indiana, The Adjutant General of Indiana, Orders Number 227-201, dated 27 November 1990, assigned him to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 1 December 1990.
5. On 25 July 2007, he was reappointed in the ARNG, as a captain.
6. On 30 September 2010, Joint Force Headquarters, Indiana, Orders Number 273-1026, revoked his orders transferring him to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).
7. Joint Force Headquarters - Indiana, Orders Number 273-1028, dated
30 September 2010, discharged him from the Army National Guard and Reserve of the Army effective 30 November 1990.
8. On 4 October 2010, he was issued an NGB 22A (Correction to NGB Form 22) which shows item 9 (Command to which Transferred) should read "NA" and item 23 (Authority and Reason) should read "NGR 635-100 Resignation."
9. A review of his official military personnel file (OMPF) does not contain any documentation related to his consideration or nonselection for Major.
10. The applicant provided a letter of support from his Regiment commander requesting favorable consideration of the applicant's request. He further states the applicant's two time nonselection for Major was due to administrative errors and miscommunications. The commander believes the applicant is an outstanding officer with much potential.
11. In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was received from NGB recommending approval of the applicant's request to have his twice non-select Major board results expunged from his records and his discharge orders amended to reflect an effective date of 30 November 1990. The opinion states the applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to Major by the 1993 and 1994 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). Further, an email from INARNG states "If [the applicant] had been separated appropriately [the applicant] would not have been in the IRR when considered for promotion under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA)."
12. On 6 October 2010, the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for acknowledgement/rebuttal. No response was received.
13. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) prescribes that an officers name may be removed from a non-recommended list if he or she was not in an active status, or in an active status in error at the time of consideration. Promotion policy does not provide for the removal of nonselections by an RCSB except when directed by this Board.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, his discharge date be corrected to show
30 November 1990 and his twice nonselection for promotion to Major be expunged from his record.
2. The evidence confirms he requested resignation from the Army National Guard on 25 August 1990; however, he was erroneously transferred to the USAR Control Group on 30 November 1990. The error was corrected by the Indiana Army National Guard on 30 September 2010 to show he was honorably discharged. He was twice not selected for promotion to Major during this period due to this administrative error. Therefore, he is entitled to have his record corrected.
3. In view of the above, he should be granted partial relief.
BOARD VOTE:
__X____ ___X____ ___X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army Records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. showing his November 1990 orders transferring him to the USAR Control Group were revoked in a timely manner and the orders discharging him from the Army National Guard and Reserve of the Army effective 30 November 1990 were issued in a timely manner;
b. showing that as a result of the above correction his non-selections to Major were void; and
c. expunging from his records all documents related to his consideration and non-selection to Major.
__________X_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100013069
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100013069
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106064C070208
Army Regulation 135-175 states, in pertinent part, that officers in the grade of first lieutenant, captain, or major, who completed their statutory military obligation, will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after the second consideration by a Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board. Army Regulation 350-100 (Officer Active Duty Service Obligations) states, in pertinent part, that officers graduating from the Special Forces Detachment Officer...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018509
Military Department of Indiana, Indianapolis, Orders 047-022, dated 9 March 1994, honorably separated him from the INARNG effective 28 March 1994 and transferred him to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement). There is no evidence he requested to be transferred to the Retired Reserve prior to 28 March 1994. There is no evidence he requested to be transferred to the Retired Reserve at that time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017286
A year later, his brother told him Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 19 (Qualitative Management Program (QMP)), stated each Soldier would get copy of the board proceedings and they could appeal. Memorandum, dated 5 November 2010, wherein he stated he had reviewed his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and, if not selected for retention, he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve and that he wanted to be allowed to achieve 20 years of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004561
The applicant provides: * Certificate showing completion of the JA Officer Basic Course * Statement to the Accession Board * DA Form 330 (Language Proficiency Questionnaire) * Letter of support * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) * Officer Evaluation Report (OER) from 17 October 2007 through 16 September 2008 * Memorandum titled: Application for appointment in the JAGC, [Applicant] * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board) * NGB Special...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003189C070206
Army Regulation 135-155, in effect at the time, prescribes the policies and procedures for the promotion of Reserve officers. The applicant submitted a request for resignation, dated 23 November 1991, to the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by voiding the non-selection of the individual concerned from the 1991 Fiscal Year Captain's Reserve Components Selection...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027948
In a memorandum for MILPO's, dated 1 September 2004, the NGB stated that the mobilization promotion policy applied to ARNG officers recommended for promotion to the grades of captain through LTC who are mobilized under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 12301(a), 12302 and 12304. The NGB stated there was no AGR LTC position available for him to be promoted into. Evidence indicates the applicant later resigned from the AGR program, accepted an ADOS position, and was promoted to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000512
He claims he resigned his commission so he would not be a non-select by an Army board and have a break in service. Chapter 9, Table 9-1 provides the regulatory civilian education requirements and states, in pertinent part, that a commissioned officer who received an initial appointment after 30 September 1983, who has no commissioned officer service before that date, must obtain a baccalaureate degree in order to qualify for promotion to the rank of major. The evidence of record confirms...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003784C070205
On 10 December 2003, the applicant was notified by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command that he was appointed as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army in the grade of second lieutenant with an adjusted date of rank. On 12 March 2004, the applicant executed an Oath of Office as a Reserve Commissioned Officer in the grade of second lieutenant. The Special Actions office recommends approval of the applicant's request to adjust his date of rank for first lieutenant to 24 January...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022250
c. National Guard Regulation (Army Regulation) 600-100 (Commissioned Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions ), paragraph 8-8(a), provides "A commissioned officer must complete the minimum years of promotion service prior to being considered for promotion and Federal recognition in the higher grade. The evidence of record shows the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 22 December 2006 upon his initial appointment in the INARNG and execution of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000832
The applicant states that: * in 1993 he was transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve * in 1996 and 1998 his military record was submitted to the Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) for consideration for promotion to captain * he was passed over both times due to non-completion of the Officer Advanced Course * he enlisted in the Arizona Air National Guard (AZANG) and served from November 1996 to 1999 * he was not eligible for promotion to captain in May 1998 3. An advisory opinion...