Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003784C070205
Original file (20060003784C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        9 January 2007
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060003784


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Maria C. Sanchez              |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. James E. Anderholm            |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Jerome L. Pionk               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Scott W. Faught               |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his date of rank for first
lieutenant be adjusted from 30 December 2005 to 24 January 2005.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his previous time-in-grade for
second lieutenant while in the Indiana Army National Guard was not
considered when computing time-in-grade for promotions requirements.

3.  The applicant provides U.S. Army Human Resources Command Orders Number
B-01-600308, dated 12 January 2006; a NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau
Report of Separation and Record of Service), dated 30 November 1996; a
memorandum from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, dated 10 December
2003; and DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated
24 January 2005, in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was commissioned in the rank of second lieutenant in the
Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG) on 30 August 1995.  On 30 November
1996, he was honorably separated from the INARNG and transferred to the
United States Army Reserve (USAR).  He had 1 year, 3 months, and 1 day of
net service in the INARNG.

2.  On 17 April 1997, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army and served
until he was honorably discharged on 12 March 2004.

3.  On 10 December 2003, the applicant was notified by the U.S. Army Human
Resources Command that he was appointed as a Reserve Commissioned Officer
of the Army in the grade of second lieutenant with an adjusted date of
rank.

4.  On 12 March 2004, the applicant executed an Oath of Office as a Reserve
Commissioned Officer in the grade of second lieutenant.

5.  On 24 January 2005, the applicant successfully completed the Military
Intelligence (MI) Officer Basic Course 04-505.

6.  U.S. Army Human Resources Command Orders B-01-600308, dated 12 January
2006, notified the applicant that he was selected for promotion to the
grade of first lieutenant with an effective date and date of rank of 30
December 2005.
7.  The Chief, Special Actions, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components of
the U.S. Human Resources Command provided an advisory opinion in this case.
 The above office opined that the applicant was appointed as a second
lieutenant in the INARNG on 30 August 1995.  They continued that when the
applicant was released, he had a net service of 1 year, 3 months, and 1
day.

8.  The Special Actions office further stated the applicant was transferred
to the U.S. Army Reserves (USAR) on 30 November 1996 and served for 5
months and 15 days, giving him a total time as a second lieutenant of 1
year, 8 months, and 16 days.  He then resigned his commission and enlisted
in the Active Army.

9.  The opinion further stated that the applicant was honorably discharged
from the Active Army on 12 March 2004, at which time he was reappointed in
the USAR.  The applicant was recommended for promotion to the grade of
first lieutenant by an administrative board and was given a date of rank
effective 30 December 2005, the date the board was approved.  The applicant
completed the Officer Basic Course on 24 January 2005.

10.  The Special Actions office recommends approval of the applicant's
request to adjust his date of rank for first lieutenant to 24 January 2005,
the date he completed the Officer Basic Course.

11.  The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for review
and comment.  The applicant has not provided a written response.

12.  Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned
Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) contains
guidance on promotion eligibility and qualification requirements.  The time
in grade requirement for promotion to first lieutenant is a minimum of 2
years and a maximum of 5 years.  Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on the
military education requirement for promotion.  It states, in pertinent
part, that in order to be promoted to first lieutenant, an officer must
complete the Officer Basic Course.

13.  Paragraph 4-21 of Army Regulation 135-155 states that the effective
date of promotion may not precede the date of the promotion memorandum.  An
officer is promoted after selection if all qualifications are met.  When an
officer does not meet the qualifications for promotion, the effective date
of promotion will not be earlier than the later date all qualifications are
met.  In no case, will the date of rank or the effective date of promotion
be earlier than the date the board is approved, or, if require, the date of
Senate confirmation.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that his date of rank for the grade of first
lieutenant be adjusted to 24 January 2005.

2.  Evidence shows that when the applicant was reappointed into the USAR on
12 March 2004, he had already served a total of 1 year, 8 months, and 16
days in the grade of second lieutenant.

3.  Evidence shows that the applicant completed the required military
education on 24 January 2005.  At that point, the applicant had served in
the grade of second lieutenant for more than 2 years.  As a result, the
applicant fulfilled the requirements for promotion to the grade of first
lieutenant.

4.  The effective date of promotion cannot be earlier than 30 December
2005, the date the results of the promotion board were approved.

5.  Based on the foregoing, the applicant's records should be corrected to
show he was promoted to the grade of first lieutenant effective 30 December
2005 with a date of rank of 24 January 2005.

BOARD VOTE:

_JLP____   _JEA___  __SWF__  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION












BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
showing he was promoted to the grade of second lieutenant effective 30
December 2005 with a date of rank of 24 January 2005.




                                     _ James E. Anderholm_____
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR                                      |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |YYYYMMDD                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)          |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013113C070206

    Original file (20050013113C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ARPERSCOM, St. Louis, issued the applicant a promotion memorandum, dated 24 November 1999, announcing his promotion to captain with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 30 October 1999, the date after withdrawal of his Federal recognition and his transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) on 29 October 1999. The applicant also stated that he was in the ARNG when promoted to captain on 29 October 1999. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016812

    Original file (20080016812.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his date of rank for major as 8 July 2004. The applicant was promoted to first lieutenant, Army Nurse Corps, with a date of rank 18 October 1996. Upon attaining 5 years time-in-grade as a first lieutenant, he was promoted to captain as a nurse with a date of rank of 17 October 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003552

    Original file (20080003552.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military service record shows he was appointed in the ARNG as an Armor officer, in the grade of 1LT/pay grade O-2, effective and with a DOR of 28 September 2006. These documents show, in pertinent part, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army, with appointment in the ARNG of the United States, in the grade of 2LT, effective 8 August 1992. b. These documents show, in pertinent part, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016621

    Original file (20080016621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The opinion states that the applicant was appointed an MSC officer on 16 March 2007 with 1 year, 4 months, and 11 days of constructive credit, adjusting his DOR to second lieutenant to 5 November 2005. He contended that the awarding of his constructive credit was in error, that he failed to be considered for a waiver as authorized by Army Regulation 135-101 (Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers for Assignment to Army Medical Department Branches), and that his reduction in rank from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022250

    Original file (20100022250.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. National Guard Regulation (Army Regulation) 600-100 (Commissioned Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions ), paragraph 8-8(a), provides "A commissioned officer must complete the minimum years of promotion service prior to being considered for promotion and Federal recognition in the higher grade. The evidence of record shows the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 22 December 2006 upon his initial appointment in the INARNG and execution of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016782

    Original file (20090016782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory opinion states the recommendation is in accordance with the DA Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-1 amendment to a policy memorandum, dated 14 January 2005, which states all Reserve Component officers (USAR and ARNG of the United States) in the rank of second lieutenant will be promoted by the Human Resources Command Office of Promotions (Reserve Components) or the NGB, as appropriate, to first lieutenant when they meet the 24-month time-in-grade requirement for promotion and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004564

    Original file (20090004564.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his direct commission into the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG) in December 2003 to show he was appointed as a first lieutenant (1LT) instead of a second lieutenant (2LT) with a clinical commission as a 72D (Environmental Science Officer) based on his master's degree qualification. The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted an application for appointment as a 70B MS officer in the ARNG. The applicant provides no supporting evidence that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001458

    Original file (20130001458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was: * promoted to MAJ (O-4) on 20 April 2007, discharged from the RA on 2 July 2007, and incorrectly placed in the IRR on 3 July 2000 * from 3 July 2007 through 15 February 2012 in an inactive status (according to HRC) or in no military status (based on his DD Form 214/discharge orders) * appointed as a Reserve officer in grade O-4 on 16 February 2012 3. In addition, as a result of this correction, any evidence of the applicant's non-selection for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004594

    Original file (20110004594.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Should the initial period of temporary Federal recognition expire due to administrative processing delays though no fault of the applicant, a subsequent Federal recognition board should be convened and another period of temporary Federal recognition granted, if warranted." Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her records to show she was extended Federal recognition effective 13 December 2008 with a DOR to 2LT of 13 December 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010804

    Original file (20100010804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant received permanent Federal recognition as a 2LT from NGB within the 6-month period required by National Guard/Army regulations. Based on the initial appointment guidance found in National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officer - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), the advisory opinion recommended the applicant's initial appointment date be adjusted to 8 July 2007, he be promoted to first lieutenant (1LT) effective 8 July 2009, and...