Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012731
Original file (20100012731.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100012731 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the entry of lost time be removed from his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states he was never absent without leave (AWOL) or absent from his appointed place of duty.  He was a good Soldier and this entry is definitely a mistake. 

3.  The applicant provides no supporting documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 April 1990, completed training, and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).

3.  An Entrance Physical Standards Board Proceedings, dated 8 March 1991, found that the applicant was suffering from symptomatic Osgood-Schlatter's disease that rendered him unfit for enlistment in accordance with Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 2-10c(7).  It was recommended that he be separated under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11.

4.  A Request for Duty Status, dated 10 April 1991, shows the applicant was AWOL effective 0700 hours 2 April 1991.

5.  A Request for Duty Status, dated 15 April 1991, shows the applicant was present for duty effective 1130 hours 15 April 1991.

6.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 19 April 1991 for failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards - no disability.  

7.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows 1 year and 12 days of creditable service with lost time from 2 April 1991 - 6 April 1991.

8.  There is no additional documentation in the available record to clarify the applicant's status during this period.

9.  Army Regulation 15-185 (ABCMR) states the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  It will decide cases on the evidence of record and it is not an investigative body.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he was never AWOL or absent from his appointed place of duty.  He was a good Soldier and this entry is definitely a mistake. 

2.  The available evidence shows the applicant was considered AWOL for 13 days prior to discharge.  There is no clarifying information to determine what his status was during this period or why only 5 days are shown on the DD Form 214.

3.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the ABCMR must apply the presumption of regularity in governmental affairs.  There is nothing in available records or in the evidence submitted by the applicant to overcome this presumption.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012731



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012731



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050017494

    Original file (20050017494.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self-Authored Statement; DD Form 616 and related documents; Personnel Action (DA Forms 4187) AWOL and DFR; CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s request that the DD Form 616 and all allied documents on file in his OMPF be removed, and that his corrected record be presented to a STAB for promotion reconsideration was carefully considered. The DD Form 616 and allied documents in question make clear the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015867

    Original file (20100015867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions discharge (UOTHC) be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD). Although the discharge documentation is not of record, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), Chapter 10, for the good of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006946

    Original file (20080006946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 January 1991, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification to appear before the administrative board and his rights to present evidence or witnesses during the board. On 26 March 1991, the separation authority reviewed the applicant’s misconduct and ordered the applicant discharged from the Army under the provisions of chapter 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 for misconduct, commission of a serious offense, abuse of illegal drugs, with a General Discharge Certificate. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006417

    Original file (20080006417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 27 February 1991 the applicant was formally charged with the offense of AWOL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002911

    Original file (20120002911.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his performance of duty was not unsatisfactory. On 8 June 1993, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge. Based on his record of NJPs, civilian arrests, and numerous counselings for unsatisfactory performance, the applicant's service clearly does not meet the acceptable standards for Army personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001715

    Original file (20090001715.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he entered this period of active duty on 10 August 1977 and was discharged on 17 January 1983 with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, by reason of administrative discharge - conduct triable by court-martial with the SPD code "JFS." On 6 October 1983, the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018042

    Original file (20120018042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The report stated the applicant had been AWOL since 1500 on 12 December 2008. He stated he really didn't want to be in the Army any more. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120018042 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120018042 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010358

    Original file (20140010358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military records by removing two DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action) dated on 10 December 2011. The applicant argues that the two DA Form 4187 reporting his absence discussed above should be removed from his records because his absence was not considered by the military police to be AWOL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002000

    Original file (20130002000.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he found various discrepancies and inaccurate facts and issues in the denial letter (Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings) and points out the following: * an incorrect unit was cited * he had a sick slip for quarters, but his chain of command refused to correct the record to show he was not AWOL * he did not receive an assignment he requested * his company commander knew he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004292

    Original file (20140004292 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 May 1992, the applicant voluntarily and in writing requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. Based on the evidence of record, his service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and...