Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010358
Original file (20140010358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  27 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140010358 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records by removing two DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action) dated on 10 December 2011.

2.  The applicant states the subject DA Forms 4187 show his duty status was changed from present for duty (PDY) to absent without leave (AWOL) at 1420 hours on 10 December 2011.  His status was subsequently changed from AWOL to PDY at 1600 hours that same day.  He argues that his period of time was only 1 hour and 40 minutes and did not constitute a period of AWOL according to Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).  He further contends that he was never listed by the military police as being AWOL and that a detective informed him that had his unit tried to submit these forms for charging him with being AWOL, they would have been denied.  He further states that the incident occurred on a Saturday, a non-duty day and the unit provided no documentation stating he was to be on duty.  Further, he argues that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determined that he was insane at the time.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* A DA Form 4187 effective 1420 hours, 10 December 2011
* A DA Form 4187 effective 1600 hours, 10 December 2011
* A letter, TriWest Healthcare Alliance, dated 31 January 2012
* A letter from the VA, dated 9 October 2013 (first page only) 


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 29 January 2001, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  He attained the rank of staff sergeant on 1 November 2006.  He subsequently was selected for promotion to sergeant first class.

2.  A DA Form 4187, dated 10 December 2011, reports that the applicant's duty status was changed from PDY to AWOL effective at 1420 hours based on his failure to return to military control for a period of 24 hours previous to 1420 hours that day.  A subsequent DA Form 4187 effective that same day at 1600 hours shows the applicant returned to duty.  Both of these forms are currently filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) as part of an 84-page separation packet.

3.  On 27 April 2012, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14 for misconduct due to a serious offense.

4.  The letter from TriWest, as provided by the applicant shows he began a medical procedure on 10 December 2011, but it does not indicate the start and ending times of this procedure.

5.  The letter from the VA, as provided by the applicant, states that the VA had determined his military service from 29 January 2001 to 27 April 2012 was honorable for VA purposes.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Army Military Human Resource Records Management (AMHRR)) provides the following:

	a.  All personnel information recorded under the authority of this regulation is the property of the United States Government.  Once recorded, it will not be removed except as provided by law or this regulation.

	b.  Once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file.  The document will not be removed from a folder or moved to another part of the OMPF unless directed by one or more of the following:

* The Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)
* The Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB)
* Chief, Appeals and Corrections Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC)
* The AMHRR custodian when documents have been improperly filed
* Commander, HRC, ATTN: HRC-PDO-PO, as an approved policy change to this regulation
* Chief, Appeals Branch, National Guard Personnel Center

7.  The Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM) states the Article 86, titled Absence without Leave (AWOL), includes the following offenses of any member of the armed forces who, without authority:

* Fails to go to his appointed place of duty at the time prescribed
* Goes from his place of duty
* Absents himself or remains absent from his unit, organization, or place of duty at which he is required to be at the time prescribed

8.  The MCM states that any one continuous period of an unauthorized absence totaling not more than 24 hours is counted as 1 day.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected by removing two DA Forms 4187 dated on 10 December 2011 because he was not AWOL.

2.  The available evidence indicates that the applicant had been absent from his place of duty for a period of 24 hours prior to 1420 hours on 10 December 2011 and that he had returned to military control at 1600 hours on 10 December 2011.

3.  The applicant argues that the two DA Form 4187 reporting his absence discussed above should be removed from his records because his absence was not considered by the military police to be AWOL.  However, he has not provided any corroborating evidence to support this contention.  Furthermore, the MCM clearly states that his absence is an offense under the provisions of Article 86 of the UCMJ.

4.  The subject documents were a part of the applicant's separation packet.  As such they were accordingly filed in his OMPF.  There is no evidence of error or injustice as a result of this filing action.  Furthermore, there is no supporting evidence showing that the contents of either form is in error.

5.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  _X_______  _X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010358





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010358



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016692

    Original file (20110016692.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of all documents from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) relating to an erroneous period of service reported as absent without leave (AWOL)/dropped from the rolls (DFR). Table 2-1 shows for: * DD Form 553 - file in the performance section; file allied documents in the restricted section; refer to filing instructions for the DA Form 4187 * DD Form 616 - file in the performance section; file allied documents in the restricted section; refer to filing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005660

    Original file (20150005660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * the removal of all documents related to his absence without leave (AWOL) from his official military personnel file (OMPF) * the Board reverse the decision of the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) to transfer such documents to the restricted folder of his OMPF, retroactive vice not retroactive * a personal hearing 2. Because they are correctly filed, there is no need to transfer those documents to another folder. _______ _ _x______...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017346

    Original file (20140017346.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of two DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 6 April 2012 and 9 April 2012, from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). A DA Form 4187, dated 19 August 2013, shows an erroneous duty status was recorded on the applicant's DA Form 4187, dated 6 April 2012. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the DA Forms 4187, dated 6 April 2012, 9 April 2012, and 19 August 2013...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012791

    Original file (20090012791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant arrived in the ROK on or about 2100 hours, 2 January 2009; he was detained by the Korean Police; he was released to the Military Police on 3 January 2009; and he reported to accountability formation on 5 January 2009. c. Records show the applicant's duty status was changed from AWOL to PDY effective 0127 hours, 3 January 2009, and that the DA Form 4187 was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012820

    Original file (20100012820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he provided the following documents in support of his application: * DA Form 4187 dated 4 March 2002 (not provided) * DA Form 4187 dated 28 March 2002 (not provided) * DD Form 553 dated 30 April 2002 * DD Form 616 dated 17 March 2003 * DA Form 4187 dated 18 March 2003 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In this case, the documents in question documenting time lost on the part of the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012443

    Original file (AR20130012443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 9 April 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130012443 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicantÂ’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the circumstances surrounding the discharge as the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013096

    Original file (20140013096.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence of record that shows he was recommended for promotion to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5. In support of his application the applicant provides the following documents: a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022965

    Original file (20120022965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Orders 262-0196 (retirement) and Orders 271-0100 (amendment) * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Dismissal of charges memorandum and acknowledgement memorandum * Multiple DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action) of absent without leave (AWOL), present for duty (PDY), and deletion of erroneous entries * Standard Form (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Disability Evaluation System Proposed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001169

    Original file (20150001169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions and removal of the Record of Proceedings under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) from his military records. On 4 December 2014 after carefully considering the evidence of record and the evidence presented by the applicant, the ABCMR denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions and removal of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006045

    Original file (20080006045.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ [Uniform Code of Military Justice]), dated 26 August 1975. The applicantÂ’s military service records contain a DD Form 293 (Application for Review of Discharge or Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States), dated 25 August 1980, that shows the applicant requested upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. Thus, the evidence of record shows...