Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012559
Original file (20100012559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100012559 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general to honorable.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he enlisted for primary military occupational specialty 93C (Air Traffic Control Operator).  He was later told he could not have this school.  He objected and he was discharged for "apathy."

3.  The applicant provides a copy of:

* his voided DA Form 3286-59 (Statement for Enlistment, United States Army Enlistment Program, U.S. Army Delayed Enlistment Program (DEP)) 
* U.S. Army Recruitment Command (USAREC) Form 986 (Separation Request Form) 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of 
Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record contains a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the U.S.) which shows he initially enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) DEP on 24 February 1992.

3.  The applicant submitted a copy of DA Form 3286-59 which shows:

* He enlisted for the U.S. Army Training Enlistment Program and training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 93C1O (Air Traffic Control Operator)
* "VOID" is written on the DA Form 3286-59, dated 9 July 1992 
* The date of enlistment in the Regular Army (RA) was scheduled for 
10 July 1992 

4.  The applicant submitted a copy of USAREC Form 986, dated 6 July 1992, which shows:

* He was voluntarily separated from the DEP 
* The reason for separation or voided enlistment is annotated to show "Apathy or Personal Problems"
* The applicant and the Recruitment Station Commander signed this form on 6 July 1992

5.  Orders Number 37-4, U.S. Army Recruiting Battalion Albany, dated 15 July 1992, shows the applicant was separated from the USAR DEP, Fort Sheridan, IL effective 9 July 1992.  

6.  Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations) states in pertinent part that a Soldier who enlisted in the USAR under the DEP and declines enlistment in the RA and is not being ordered to active duty, the service will be described as an entry level separation.

7.  Army Regulation 135-178 further states in pertinent part that if a Soldier's enlistment is voided that Soldier will not receive a discharge, characterization of service at separation, or an uncharacterized description of service.  Instead, the separation will be described as an order of release from custody and control of the Army.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.  

9.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is no evidence in the applicant's official record nor did he submit any evidence that shows he reported for or served on continuous active duty in the RA.  The available evidence clearly shows he was voluntarily separated while in the USAR DEP for apathy/personal problems.  Therefore, he was never issued a characterization of service and his records are correct as currently constituted. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012559



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030462

    Original file (20100030462.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) completed when he enlisted shows in item 32a (Specific Option/Program Enlisted for) he enlisted for 3 years, training in MOS 19K, and an enlistment bonus in the amount of $4,000. The advisory official confirmed the applicant was to be paid a $4,000 enlistment bonus and stated a review of the available records did not show the bonus had been paid. The evidence of record supports the applicant's request to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015502

    Original file (20110015502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. A DA Form 3286-59 (completed when he enlisted shows he enlisted for 3 years, training in MOS 13B, and an enlistment bonus in the amount of $5,000.00. The advisory official confirmed the applicant was to be paid a $5,000.00 enlistment bonus...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010414

    Original file (20080010414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his separation document to show he entered active duty on 16 September 1998 and that he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal. The applicant’s military service records contain a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 September 2002. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct Item 12, block a, of the applicant’s DD Form 214 to show he entered active duty this period on 16 September 1998.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004584

    Original file (20070004584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states, in effect, that his enlistment contract shows "ACF - $40,000", not "ACF & MGIB - $40,000." The applicant's service records contain a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding, U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program), Annex D, dated 28 June 2000. There is insufficient evidence to show he was not advised that the $40,000.00 listed as his ACF benefit was the total combined amount of the MGIB and the ACF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012683C071108

    Original file (20060012683C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of an Enlistment Reservation Sheet, undated; USAREC Form 1150-R-E (Statement of Understanding - Army Policy, USAREC Addendum to DD Form 1966 Series), dated 11 May 1999; DA Form 3286-59 (Statement for Enlistment, U.S. Army Enlistment Program, U.S. Army Delayed Enlistment Program), Annex A, dated 11 May 1999; DA Form 3286-67 (Statement of Understanding, Army Policy), Annex B, dated 11 May 1999; DA Form 3286-70 (Addendum to Statements for Enlistment,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015329

    Original file (20070015329.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 12.a., of the applicant's DD Form 214, shows the entry: 2003 / 07 / 31. The applicant is therefore entitled to a correction of Item 12.d to show he had no active service time before 31 July 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. correcting Item 12.c., of the applicant's DD Form 214, to show the entry: 0003 / 10 / 05 as opposed to the currently shown 0000 / 11 / 26; b. correcting Item 12.d., of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023146

    Original file (20110023146.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application, the applicant provides the following documents: a. a copy of the DD Form 2366, dated 19 March 2003, that was previously considered; however, item 3 of the copy provided also shows the handwritten entry, "ACF $40,000.00 as per USAREC msg 03-033, dtg 142014Z March [2003]; and b. an Army reservation form, dated 19 March 2003, that shows a successful reservation was completed for the applicant to enlist in the RA for a period of 4 years for the following options: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009229

    Original file (20060009229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 1 (Acknowledgement) of this document shows that she enlisted for the U. S. Army Training Enlistment Program, U.S. Army Incentive Program, Cash Bonus ($1,000.00), the ACF ($40,000.00), and that the date of her enlistment in the RA was scheduled for 8 January 2002. The applicant's service records contain a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding, United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program), dated 8 January 2002. There is insufficient evidence to show she was not advised that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022451

    Original file (20120022451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) * DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States) * DA Form 3286-59 (Statement for Enlistment – U.S. Army Enlistment Option – U.S. Army Delayed Entry Program (DEP)) * DA Form 3286-60 (Statement for Enlistment – U.S. Army Enlistment Options) * DA Form 3286-61 (Statement of Understanding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008730

    Original file (20090008730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 February 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008730 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides a copy of Headquarters, 88th Regional Readiness Command, Fort Snelling, MN, Orders 06-338-00105, dated 4 December 2006 that discharged him from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), effective 3 January 2007; and a copy of USAR Personnel Command, St. Louis, MO letter, subject: Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (Twenty Year Letter),...