Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012419
Original file (20100012419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100012419 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states while he was in Vietnam, he was riding in the back of a dump truck when it hit a land mine.  His leg was cut when he was thrown out of the truck.  Since his leg was not cut badly (it only required two butterfly bandages), his lieutenant didn't put him in for the Purple Heart.

3.  He did not pursue his Purple Heart earlier, but now needs it since Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health benefits are only given to poor veterans or veterans who have been awarded the Purple Heart.

4.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), a picture of a Soldier standing by a damaged truck, and a picture of what appears to be a blast hole in a dirt road. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 September 1966, was awarded the military occupational specialty of construction machine operator, served in Vietnam from 21 February 1967 to 25 September 1968, and was promoted to pay grade E-4.

3.  On 25 June 1969, the applicant was given a separation physical examination.  While the applicant listed having a cyst behind his neck removed in Vietnam, he did not mention being wounded during this physical examination.

4.  The applicant's military records do not contain any mention of him being wounded or any orders awarding him the Purple Heart.

5.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), Item 40 (Wounds) is blank.

6.  The Vietnam Casualty List does not contain the applicant's name.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence in the applicant's records to corroborate the applicant's contention that he was wounded.

2.  Without evidence to show that the applicant was wounded and he received medical treatment for his wound, he is not entitled to a Purple Heart.

3.  The Board does not change a properly constituted record in order to establish entitlement to benefits from other Agencies.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION 

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012419





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012419



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005057

    Original file (20090005057.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides three photographs as new evidence. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019357

    Original file (20100019357.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service medical records were not available for review. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), then in effect, provided that the Purple Heart was awarded to any member of an Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services had been wounded, killed, or who had died as a result of a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. In the absence of military records which show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002474

    Original file (20090002474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There also is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that shows his injury was a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013542

    Original file (20090013542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013542 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The service medical record provided by the applicant does not show that the lacerations to his legs were the result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012365

    Original file (20080012365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant served in the RVN from 5 June 1968 through 4 June 1969. Regrettably, in the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. Given the above, there is insufficient evidence upon which to grant award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510578C070209

    Original file (9510578C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to reflect award of the Purple Heart and Combat Medical Badge. The physician stated that in December 1966, “while carrying a litter” he asked him about a limp and noticed “he was bleeding from his right leg.” The statement goes on to note “as I recall checking him [the applicant] I located shrapnel in his right leg, right side of waist, and the left upper section of his chest.” PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025730

    Original file (20100025730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's Representative in Congress states the applicant is 88 years old and has been fighting for the FSM's Purple Heart since her first application in May 2008. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005454

    Original file (20120005454.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was awarded the Purple Heart. The medical records that the applicant provides show he was wounded in action on 9 June 1969 when he sustained injuries to his neck and right elbow and a fragment wound to his left hip.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019318

    Original file (20120019318.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. In the absence of evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis upon which to award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001090

    Original file (20090001090.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Authorized or Awarded) of the applicant's DD Form 214 for the ending period 30 October 1968 does not show award of the Purple Heart or the Combat Infantryman Badge. The author further stated that he visited the applicant in the hospital and the applicant showed him the helmet with...