Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011249
Original file (20110011249.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  22 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110011249 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests change of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "children" to "spouse" coverage. 

2.  The applicant states he ended his service in October 1992 after completing
23 years of active and reserve service.  He was not married at the time and he chose to have his children as the beneficiaries of his SBP annuity.  He married on 9 September 1995 but he was unaware that he had to submit a change in election within 1 year of his marriage.

3.  The applicant provides:

* his Certificate of Marriage
* a DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Change Certificate), dated 2 January 2010
* a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated
4 January 2010

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 28 December 1950.

2.  Having had prior enlisted service, he was appointed as a second lieutenant in the Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG) and he executed a National 

Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 337 (Oaths of Office) on 21 January 1975.  He served in a variety of assignments and he attained the rank of major (MAJ).

3.  On 24 March 1992, the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO, issued him a memorandum, subject:  Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60, commonly known as the 20-year letter.  This letter notified him he had completed the required years of service and he would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60.

4.  On 21 July 1992, he completed a DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Form).  He indicated he was not married but he had dependent children.  He listed his children (NRS, born on 28 July 1975; JMS, born on 11 January 1978; and DJS, born on 18 December 1980).  He elected "children only" coverage, full amount, option C (immediate coverage), under the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP).

5.  On 27 October 1994, he was honorably discharged and he was transferred to the Retired Reserve.

6.  On 9 September 1995, he married his current spouse, JJS.  However, there is no indication he notified the appropriate officials of his marriage or that he requested a change of RCSBP coverage from children to spouse within 1 year of his marriage.

7.  On 4 January 2010, he applied for retired pay at age 60. 

8.  He provides:

	a.  a DD Form 2656-6, dated 2 January 2010, wherein he indicated he was changing his election from "children" to "spouse" coverage based on his marriage.

	b.  a DD Form 2656, dated 4 January 2010, wherein he indicated he was married to JJS and he elected spouse SBP coverage based on the full amount.

9.  His record also shows he was placed on the Retired List in his retired rank of MAJ on 28 December 2010, his 60th birthday.

10.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.  Since its creation, it has been subjected to a number of substantial legislative changes.

11.  Public Law 95-397, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for Reserve Component members who qualified for Reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60 and eligible to participate in the SBP, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options were available:

* elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation
* elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60, but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; or
* elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60

12.  Once a member elects either option B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.  Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60.  They cannot cancel SBP participation or change options they had in RCSBP; the options automatically roll into SBP coverage.

13.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5), provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP, but who later marries or acquires a dependent child, may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.

14.  Public Law 105-261, enacted 17 October 1998, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 March 1999-29 February 2000.  The retiree must have paid monthly premiums starting on the date of enrollment and a one-time, lump sum enrollment premium.  Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes, issued several times a year to retirees and gray-area retirees to keep them abreast of items of interest to retirees.

15.  The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 established an Open Season for enrollment to be conducted from 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006.  The retiree must pay monthly premiums starting on the date of enrollment and a buy-in premium covering all the costs that would have been paid for the election if it had been made at the first opportunity to do so.  Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the applicant executed a DD Form 1883 on 21 July 1992, electing "children only" coverage under option C (immediate coverage).  He did not have a spouse at the time.

2.  He married some 3 years later on 9 September 1995.  The law permitted him to add his spouse within 1 year of their marriage; however, he did not do so.  When he failed to add his spouse within 1 year of their marriage, he irrevocably forfeited future spouse coverage except during a Congressionally-approved open enrollment period.  The law established Open Seasons to be conducted from 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000 and from 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006, thus allowing the applicant two opportunities to enroll his spouse in the SBP.

3.  He completed a DD Form 2656-6 on 2 January 2010; however, this form could not be processed since it was not received within 1 year of his marriage. He also completed a DD Form 2656 on 4 January 2010.  However, again there was no open season in effect at the time he completed this form.

4.  The decision to enroll in or disenroll from the SBP/RCSBP is a personal decision made by the member and his/her family.  In this case, the applicant and his spouse were married on 9 September 1995.  Having previously completed his DD Form 1883 for children coverage just 3 years earlier and having been afforded the opportunity to enroll his spouse during an Open Season, the applicant knew or should have known of the requirements to change his desired coverage or at least to inquire about adding his spouse had he decided to do so. 

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x___  ___x_____  __x______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011249



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011249



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022079

    Original file (20100022079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his records be corrected to show he elected "spouse" Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage instead of "children only" coverage. The evidence of record shows that the applicant made his initial RCSBP election on 20 September 1991, after he became retirement eligible. Since he married his spouse in February 1997, he's had three opportunities to add his spouse to his RCSBP coverage: 4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011191

    Original file (20110011191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he requested spouse Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage in a timely manner. He provided a DD Form 1883, dated 1 May 1994, which shows on that date he was not married and he elected to participate in the RCSBP for children only coverage, full base amount, option C (Immediate Annuity). Evidence indicates he first attempted to request a change to his SBP election in conjunction with his application...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013913

    Original file (20100013913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100013913 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In connection with his application, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656-6 and indicated he was married to the applicant and elected "spouse only" SBP coverage based on the full gross pay without supplemental SBP. The evidence of record shows that upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the FSM executed a DD Form 1883 on 20 July 1989, electing "children only" coverage under option B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020185

    Original file (20100020185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show he elected spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. c. in Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence) (Required when member is married and elects children only coverage or does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage), item 30 (I hereby concur with the SBP election made by my spouse. This form shows the FSM indicated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024346

    Original file (20100024346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant executed an SBP Election Certificate on 18 August 1994 electing immediate coverage under option C for children-only coverage upon receipt of his 20-year letter. At that time, his election would have been sent to HRC because DFAS had not yet established a retired pay account as he was still under the age of 60. In this case, the applicant and his spouse were married on 30 August 1996.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011835

    Original file (20090011835.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This letter notified the applicant that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. The evidence of record shows that upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the applicant executed an SBP Election Certificate, on 26 September 1979, electing immediate coverage under Option C for "spouse and children" at a reduced amount. The evidence of record further shows that as he neared age 60, the applicant executed another form, in this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016959

    Original file (20110016959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * marriage certificate * DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate), dated 3 January 1995 * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 4 October 2007 * Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)-Cleveland (CL) Form 7220/148 (Retiree Account Statement), dated 2 December 2010 * letter to DFAS, dated 21 January 2011 * letter from DFAS, dated 22 March 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 4 October 2007, he completed a DD Form 2656 electing spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009629

    Original file (20090009629.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that when he completed the DD Form 1883 (Survivor Election Plan Certificate), on 7 December 2002, he was unmarried and was not told, if he were married at a later date and desired spouse SBP coverage, he would have to change his election within 1 year of the date of his marriage. The evidence of record shows that upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the applicant executed an SBP Election Certificate, on 7 December 2002, electing immediate coverage under Option C for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015598

    Original file (20130015598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656-9 (SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election), dated 25 January 2006, shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He provided a letter from DFAS, dated 12 July 2013, which states: * their records indicate he elected RCSBP child coverage on his DD Form 1883 on 7 February 1988 * at that time he was not married * on his original DD Form 2656 he elected SBP for his spouse and he indicated his marriage occurred on 19 May 1989 * there is a 1-year window of eligibility * notification, along...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003898

    Original file (20090003898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of a DD Form 2656-3, dated 23 November 1999, which shows an election of spouse and child beneficiary category based on the full amount of retired pay with immediate coverage. Each statement showed the current SBP coverage elected by the retiree or the fact that no SBP election is reflected. As such, the election for spouse and child only made at the time of his retired pay application would not have been valid.