Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011500
Original file (20100011500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    7 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100011500 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request to correct his military records to show he was discharged due to a physical disability.

2.  The applicant states he was recommended for discharge due to other designated physical or mental conditions which impaired his ability to effectively perform his duties.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his request for reconsideration, copies of undated and unsigned memoranda indicating he was considered for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17 for other designated physical or mental conditions.  He also provides copies of medical documents. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090013372, on 2 February 2010.

2.  The memoranda and medical documents provided by the applicant are new evidence that requires consideration by the Board:

	a.  The applicant has provided an unsigned and undated memorandum from the company commander notifying the applicant of his intent to separate him from the service due to other designated physical or mental conditions.  The memorandum indicates the applicant was to acknowledge receipt by signing and dating it which he did not.

	b.  The applicant provided an unsigned and undated memorandum from the company commander to the battalion commander recommending that the applicant be separated due to other designated physical or mental conditions.

	c.  The medical documents from the Clark Health clinic indicate the applicant suffered from muscle spasms to his upper/mid back.  There is no evidence that he was referred to a medical board.

3.  The applicant's separation packet is not available.  He was honorably discharged on 15 April 2005 by reason of physical condition not a disability after completing 1 year, 1 month, and 14 days of creditable active service.

4.  The original Board proceedings stated the applicant contended he had been discharged because of his back.  However, no evidence was available to support this contention.  The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) subsequently granted him a 10 percent disability rating for degenerative joint disease.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-18 sets the policy and prescribes procedures for separating members on the basis of other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability that potentially interfere with assignment to or performance of duty.  Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, chronic airsickness or seasickness, sleepwalking, claustrophobia, and other disorders manifesting disturbances of perception, thinking, emotional control or behavior sufficiently severe that the Soldier’s ability to effectively perform military duties is significantly impaired.

6.  Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.  Under the laws governing the Army Physical Disability Evaluation system, Soldiers who sustain or aggravate physically unfitting disabilities must meet several lines of duty criteria to be eligible to receive retirement and severance pay benefits.  One of the criteria is that the disability must have been incurred or aggravated while the Soldier was entitled to basic pay or was the proximate cause of performing active duty or inactive duty training.



7.  Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 1110 and 1131, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service.  The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.  The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned.  Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show he was discharged due to a physical disability.  He also contends he was recommended for discharge due to other designated physical or mental conditions which impaired his ability to effectively perform his duties.

2.  The medical evidence provided by the applicant fails to show that he was evaluated by a medical board and found unfit for military service.

3.  The memoranda provided by the applicant appear to have never been processed by his chain of command, and may have been no more than working documents initiated by the command as a possible option in their decision-making process concerning the applicant's separation.

4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20090013372, dated 2 February 2010.



      __________X_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011500



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011500



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014447

    Original file (20090014447.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She adds that her medical evaluation board (MEBD) recommended her discharge in accordance with Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations) as listed on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which is for medical reasons, and that the orders she received from the Army and National Guard Regulations are also for medical reasons. The evidence of record shows the applicant was ordered to active duty in an AGR status on 3 October 2006. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001886

    Original file (20140001886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available service record does not show she was issued a permanent profile for any medical or mental health condition nor was she diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or an Anxiety Disorder while on active duty. The service medical records provided by the applicant do not show a diagnosis of PTSD or Anxiety Disorder while on active duty. The available medical records provided by the applicant show that she was treated for various medical conditions which included...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014069

    Original file (20100014069.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests the applicant's military records be corrected to change the reason for his separation from administrative separation under Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), paragraph 5-17, to reflect a medical retirement with a disability rating of at least 50 percent under Title 10, U.S. Code (USC) 1201, Army Regulation 40-400 (Patient Administration), Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), and Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016958

    Original file (20120016958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge be voided and that he be discharged or retired by reason of permanent disability or that he be afforded a medical evaluation under the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES). Counsel states, in effect, that the applicant was discharged in 2006 at a time when the Army treated PTSD and mental disorders differently than it does today. On 1 November 2006, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008770

    Original file (20120008770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB proceedings do not show a recommendation or any other entries by Army officials; f. a DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings) that shows a PEB convened on 17 April 2007 to evaluate the applicant's type II diabetes, well controlled on oral agents: (1) the board found the applicant fit for duty and returned him to duty, and (2) the applicant concurred with the PEB findings and recommendations on 19 April 2007; g. a VA Rating Decision, dated 3 May 2008, that shows the following decisions were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024670

    Original file (20100024670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 February 2010, the DVA granted the applicant a 10 percent disability rating for an adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood. The Army must find unfitness for duty at the time of separation before a member may be medically retired or separated. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029208

    Original file (20100029208.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5–17 (Other designated physical or mental conditions), states that specified commanders may approve separation under this paragraph on the basis of other physical or mental conditions not amounting to disability (Army Regulation 635–40) and excluding conditions appropriate for separation processing under paragraph 5–11 or 5–13 that potentially interfere with assignment to or performance of duty. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001188

    Original file (20130001188.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After all, he did not know he had PTSD. A designation of "unfit for duty" is required before an individual can be separated from the military because of an injury or medical condition. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years of service and a disability rating at less than 30 percent.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013372

    Original file (20090013372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided no medical records and there are no medical records available for the Board to review. However, there is no evidence and the applicant has not provided any that indicates he had a medically unfitting disability that was incurred or aggravated while he was entitled to basic pay which required physical disability processing at the time of separation. Consequently, the applicant's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007972

    Original file (20120007972.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. The medical official stated that no weapons should be issued to the applicant during the remainder of his military service, the applicant's retention in the service would create additional management problems for the command, and the command could expect the applicant's performance to resemble his past performance. When a commander determines that a Soldier has a physical or mental condition that potentially interferes with assignment to or performance of duty, the commander will refer...