Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011319
Original file (20100011319.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100011319 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the characterization of service on her U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders be changed from "uncharacterized" to "honorable."

2.  The applicant states she believes her characterization of service is incorrect because she fulfilled her USAR contract by completing 6 years of active Reserve and 2 years of inactive Reserve.  She has also earned 552 points of qualifying Reserve service towards non-regular retirement.  The uncharacterized discharge is preventing her from being eligible for the Department of Veterans Affairs benefits specifically a home loan.  She attended her drills and annual training (AT) every year and therefore she has fulfilled her obligation.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her discharge orders, dated 12 May 1993; and a copy of a printout of retirement points. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show she enlisted in the USAR for a period of 8 years on 12 January 1987 and was subsequently assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 926th Engineer Battalion, Birmingham, AL.  

3.  Her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States) stipulated she would be a member of a troop program unit (TPU) for a period of 6 years and a member of the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) for the balance of her 8-year service obligation.  Furthermore, item 5e of her DA Form 3540/2 (Certificate and Acknowledgement of U.S. Army Reserve Service Requirements and Method of Fulfillment) contains the entry "I will be required to perform satisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve for a period of 8 years." 

4.  On 10 August 1987, she entered active duty for training (ADT).  She completed the training requirements and she was awarded military occupational specialty 71L (Administrative Specialist).  She was released from ADT to the control of her USAR unit on 15 December 1987.

5.  The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) she was issued shows he completed 4 months and 6 days of creditable active service and she was assigned an entry level status (uncharacterized) character of service.

6.  Her records show she was an active participant in her unit drills and AT from January 1987 through January 1993.  She earned the following points: 

From
To
Inactive
points
Active
points
Membership
Points
Total 
Points 
01/12/1987
01/11/1988
20
126
15
161
01/12/1988
01/11/1989
41
17
15
73
01/12/1989
01/11/1990
47
15
15
75
01/12/1990
01/11/1991
39
15
15
69
01/12/1991
01/11/1992
41
15
15
71
01/12/1992
01/11/1993
28
15
15
58
01/12/1993
01/11/1994
0
0
15
15
01/12/1994
01/11/1995
0
0
15
15
01/12/1995
01/11/1996
0
0
15
15

7.  The facts and circumstances surrounding her discharge from the USAR prior to completing her 8-year obligation are not available for review with this case.  However, her records contain Orders 58-2, issued by Headquarters, 121st USAR Command, Birmingham, AL, discharging her from the USAR on 12 May 1993 with an uncharacterized discharge under the authority of Army Regulation
135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel), effective 12 May 1993.

8.  Army Regulation 135-178 prescribes policies, criteria, and procedures which apply to the separation of enlisted members of the Army National Guard and the USAR.  The version of the regulation in effect at the time stated the characterization of the discharge certificate issued upon administrative discharge will be based solely upon the enlisted member's behavior and performance of duty during the current period of service, when the member was either-
(1) Actually performing active duty, AT, ADT, or in active duty, or (2) Actively participating in or under an obligation to participate in Reserve activities, and the behavior relates directly to the member's Reserve status.  

9.  An honorable discharge is a separation from the U.S. States Army with honor. The issuance of an honorable discharge is conditioned upon proper military behavior and proficient and industrious performance of duty, giving due regard to the grade held and the capabilities of the member concerned. 

10.  An Uncharacterized Separation is an entry-level separation.  A separation will be described as an entry-level separation if processing is initiated while a member is in entry-level status except when a characterization of under other than honorable conditions is warranted by the circumstances of the case or when the Secretary of the Army, on a case-by-case basis, determines the characterization of service of Honorable is clearly warranted by the presence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance of duty.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends her discharge orders should be corrected to show an honorable character of service.  

2.  The available evidence shows she completed a period of ADT during which she was awarded an MOS and upon release from active duty she was assigned an entry level status characterization of service.  Having completed less than the 180 days of military service her character of service was appropriately and accurately reflected as uncharacterized on her DD Form 214.


3.  Subsequent to her release from active duty, she was an active participant in her unit drills and/or annual training and accumulated at least 50 points (a good year) in each of the first 6 years of her enlistment.  However, the facts and circumstances surrounding her discharge on 12 May 1993, some 22 months prior to completing her statutory commitment (11 March 1995) are not available for review with this case.  It is unclear why she was not transferred to the IRR for the balance of her 8-year service obligation.  

4.  Although at the time of her discharge she was not in an entry level status and should not have been issued an uncharacterized discharge, in the absence of the facts and circumstances surrounding her discharge, it is unclear what character of service she should have received at the time.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant her the requested relief in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011319



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011319



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029609

    Original file (20100029609.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, through her Member of Congress, the removal of the inactive time from 7 March 1994 to 31 August 1999 from her records. Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers) provides for the separation of officers of the Army National Guard of the United States and the U.S. Army Reserve, except for officers serving on active duty or active duty for training exceeding 90 days. The evidence of record, during the period 11 September 1993 through 7 November 1993, shows she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019633

    Original file (20100019633.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the removal of memoranda, dated 29 January 1993 and 1 March 1994, from his records that show he was non-selected for promotion to captain (CPT) twice. On 24 February 1992, his immediate commander initiated a request to separate him in accordance with paragraph 2-12 of Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers). On 1 March 1994, by memorandum also addressed to the applicant at his Birmingham, AL address, HRC-STL again notified him that he was considered for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002929

    Original file (20130002929.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her service as honorable. The applicant provides copies of her: * DD Form 214 * reassignment orders * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) * discharge orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Only the honorable characterization may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-220

    Original file (2007-220.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated June 12, 2008, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, a chief health services specialist who was medically retired from the Reserve on April 5, 1997, with a 30% disability rating for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), asked the Board to correct her time in service, awards, and Reserve drill points for her inactive duty training (IDT (paid drills)), active duty training (ADT), special active duty training...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000170

    Original file (20120000170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized. She completed 5 months and 9 days of active service and her service was uncharacterized. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018991

    Original file (20090018991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, through his United States Senator: * That his name be "cleared of the slander and libel stating that I was AWOL [absent without leave]" * That his rank be adjusted to something higher, such as lieutenant colonel * That his student loans be repaid * That his retirement points be updated * That he receive a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for his Reserve Army Nurse Corps service 2. The applicant enlisted in the Pennsylvania Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007526

    Original file (20130007526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized." The letter states VA records certified she "separated under honorable conditions from active duty military service." Chapter 4 (Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation) states the service of ARNG Soldiers in an entry-level status upon completion of IADT will be uncharacterized even though they...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009020C070206

    Original file (20050009020C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It further shows that she was credited with zero points for the period 27 August 1984 through 8 May 1987. It further shows that she was credited with zero points for the period 27 August 1984 through 8 May 1987. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was credited with 73 retirement points during the period 2 December 1983 through 26 August 1984 and had completed 8 months and 25 days of service, which was a partial qualifying year for retirement purposes.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019083

    Original file (20080019083.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her AHRC Form 606-E (Statement of Service with Retirement Points) to show 15 qualifying years for non-regular retirement and the issuance of a 15-year letter. On 29 February 2008, the applicant petitioned the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) for correction of her qualifying years for non-regular retirement. She adds that she heard the HRC representative tell the applicant that he would reply to her request and that it would take...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020333

    Original file (20130020333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 May 1991 to show "honorable" or "general, under honorable conditions" instead of "uncharacterized." Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated a DD Form 214 was a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service. Though evidence shows she was...