Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010925
Original file (20100010925.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100010925 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he believes his performance on active duty and the recognition he received during his service warrants award of the AGCM.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a letter explaining his application
* a letter of commendation and two certificates of appreciation
* a copy of his promotion orders to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 
* a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* a copy of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and record of Service)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 


provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 March 1982 for a period of 3 years and training as a tank systems mechanic.  He successfully completed his training and he was assigned to Fort Polk, LA for his first duty assignment.  He was subsequently transferred to an armor battalion in Germany and he was promoted to SGT/E-5 on 21 July 1984.

3.  On 27 February 1985 he was honorably released from active duty at Fort Dix, NJ due to completion of his term of service.  He had served 2 years, 11 months, and 19 days of total active service.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Army Service Ribbon and the Overseas Service Ribbon.

4.  A review of his official records shows that he received one Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) for which he received maximum ratings.  His records do not contain any derogatory information and there is no evidence of the commander taking any action to deny him the award of the AGCM.

5.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, established the criteria for award of the AGCM.  It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service.  The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM.  There is no automatic entitlement to award of the AGCM; however, the commander must notify the individual Soldier in writing if he intends to deny the award of the AGCM and the denial must be filed in the official records.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 9 March 1982 through 27 February 1985.  This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award. 

2.  Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to award him the AGCM at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for period
9 March 1982 through 27 February 1985 and

   b.  adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award).



      ____________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010925



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010925



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012808

    Original file (20070012808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (First Award) for the period 3 March 1982 through 2 March 1985. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001829

    Original file (20140001829.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The applicant states he was never awarded the AGCM for his honorable service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 27 December 1983 to 15 December 1986 and adding it to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030158

    Original file (20100030158.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of his DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 January 2002 and 24 April 2006. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 January 1998 for a period of 4 years under the airborne/infantry training option. He was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 9 November 2000 and continued to serve in Italy until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 26 January 2002 due to completion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002649

    Original file (20140002649.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021794

    Original file (20100021794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Paragraph 2-4 of Army Regulation 635-5 states that an active duty Soldier deployed with his or her unit during their continuous period of active service, will have the following statement entered in item 18 of the DD Form 214: "SERVICE IN (NAME OF COUNTRY DEPLOYED) FROM (inclusive dates for example, YYYYMMDD-YYYYMMDD)." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003888

    Original file (20090003888.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-20 of the awards regulation provides that the KDSM is authorized to be awarded to members who served on active duty in Korea for 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days after 28 July 1954 to a date to be determined. As a result, given the applicant did not serve in Korea during the qualifying period, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting this portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007949

    Original file (20130007949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his service in Korea and his award of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006109

    Original file (20110006109.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is not entitled to have his record corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting C Battery, 6th Battalion, 14th Field Artillery Regiment, USAREUR E7 from item 7 of his DD Form 214; b. adding Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 6th Battalion, 14th Field Artillery Regiment, 1st Armored Division, USAREUR E7 to item 9 of his DD Form 214; c. awarding him the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003349

    Original file (20110003349.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam. Although the applicant's record is void of specific evidence of his personal participation in active ground combat with his unit in the RVN, it does confirm he served as an infantryman in MOS 11C with a qualifying infantry unit during his tour of duty in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001082

    Original file (20120001082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 2 (Personnel Qualification Record), dated 15 January 1979, also lists his rank title as SP5 in item 9 (Grade). As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active service from 22 August 1975 through 21 August 1978, and add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for...