IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 16 November 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100010208
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the proper amount of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) he was authorized to receive when he was discharged.
2. The applicant states the "pay department" stated they overpaid him by approximately $15,000.00. He applied for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits and was told the VA cannot pay him because of his separation bonus.
3. The applicant provides no documents in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 30 May 1995 after completing 11 years, 10 months, and 3 days of active service with 4 years of prior active service. He completed a total of 15 years, 10 months, and 3 days of active military service.
3. Item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 shows he received an SSB payment in the amount of $54,299.90. The calculations upon which this payment was based are not contained in the available records.
4. During the processing of this case, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) was asked to review the applicant's Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) to confirm the amount of his SSB payment. His MMPA shows he received an SSB payment of $54,299.91, less $15,203.97 for Federal income tax withheld (FITW).
5. The National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 1992 established two monetary incentive programs to assist in maximizing voluntary separation during the drawdown period of military forces. One incentive was called the SSB which paid separation pay equal to 15 percent of the Soldier's annual basic pay times the number of years of service.
6. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states that for a Soldier receiving separation/readjustment or non-disability severance pay (as indicated by the finance office), to enter the type of pay and amount in item 18.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request to correct the amount of his SSB payment.
2. There is no documentary evidence showing the applicant received more or less than the amount of SSB to which he was entitled.
3. His DD Form 214 shows he received an SSB payment in the amount of $54,299.90, and his MMPA shows he received a payment in the amount of $54,299.91 less $15,203.97 for FITW. Although there is a discrepancy of $.01, this discrepancy does not constitute a substantive error warranting correction of the record.
4. It appears the applicant's issue lies with VA policies and/or regulations. If he believes the VA has improperly denied him payment of benefits, he may appeal to that agency.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__X_____ ___X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ X _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100010208
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100010208
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02102
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) corrected his records in 2009 to allow him to enroll in the Enlisted College Loan Repayment Program (ECLRP). On 2 Dec 2008, the applicant submitted an application to the AFBCMR requesting his records be corrected to allow his enrollment in the Enlisted College Loan Repayment Program (ECLRP). DPSIT states that the Air Force policy on ECLRP...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003721
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 18 (Remarks) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), to show she received $61,956.57 instead of $85,791.43 in Special Separation Benefit (SSB) pay. If a member who has received an SSB payment becomes eligible for retired pay, recoup from the member the gross amount of SSB received, as shown on the members DD Form 214 [emphasis added]. The applicant wants the amount of the SSB payment on her DD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004406
Senator regarding the applicant's SSB recoupment from his military retired pay account. (3) Issue Three: DODFMR, Volume 7B, Chapter 4, subparagraph 040602 B, further states no recoupment of SSB is required, regardless of when paid, if the disability for which the member receives DVA compensation was incurred or aggravated during a period of later active duty. There is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows DFAS has recouped an inappropriate amount of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011496
It does not appear from the record that DFAS is withholding VSI payments because the applicant is now receiving VA disability compensation. The statute authorizing disability severance pay provides that, "the amount of disability severance pay received under this section shall be deducted from any compensation for the same disability to which the former member of the armed forces or his dependents become entitled under any law administered by [VA]." However, the DFAS determination as to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012005
He states, in effect, that: * the city on his DD Form 214 in item 7b HOR is misspelled * although he was awarded three ARCOMs, his DD Form 214 only shows two * he chose to leave the Army reluctantly, yet voluntarily under the SSB due to medical and personal hardship reasons * although his separation orders mentioned his SSB pay was subject to recoupment if he became eligible for retired pay, there was no mention of repayment of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits * the VA has rated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008955
The applicant's record contains no medical treatment records or other documents that indicate the applicant was suffering from a disabling medical condition that would have warranted his separation processing through medical channels at the time he voluntarily requested early separation under the provisions of the FY 92 Enlisted Voluntary Early Release Transition Program with an SSB. The evidence of record confirms the applicant voluntarily requested early transition with a SSB under the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020511
The opinion also states the applicant documented on his application that he was ordered to active duty and alluded to an "agreement" that would allow him back on active duty in exchange for a bonus. ALARACT [All Army Activities] Message, dated December 1991, pertaining to voluntary incentive programs states, in pertinent part, Soldiers who receive SSB and who subsequently serve on active duty, Reserve duty in a pay status, or inactive duty for training shall not forfeit any SSB or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012150
The applicant request correction of her records to show she has enough qualifying years for entitlement to a nonregular retirement. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), in effect at the time, stated that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have (1) attained age 60; (2) completed a minimum of 20 years of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006707
He provides: * Self-authored statement, dated 30 March 2013 * Memorandum, Subject: Notification of Incentive Discrepancy and Exception to Policy Process, dated 20 January 2012 * Letter, dated 25 January 2012, addressed to State Incentive Manager * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-1-R-F (Annex F to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) - NPSEB Addendum - Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS)) * Annex E to DD Form 4 (NPSEB Bonus Addendum - ARNGUS) * Email...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064450C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to reflect that he elected separation from active Army under the Variable Separation Incentive (VSI) Program instead of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) Program. Initially, only a non-monetary, voluntary separation program was announced providing retirement opportunities for some soldiers who had less than 20 but more than 15 years of active military service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions...