Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010153
Original file (20100010153.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100010153 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his reentry eligibility (RE) code 4 be changed so that he may enlist in the Army.

2.  The applicant states he was unaware he would never be able to reenter military service.  He wants nothing more than to serve his country.  He wants to enlist, but needs his RE code changed.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 2 November 2006, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.

2.  The applicant was absent without leave (AWOL) from 15 February 2007 to 13 March 2007 and from 16 March 2007 to 21 July 2008.

3.  Charges were preferred on 28 July 2008 for the applicant's last period of AWOL.

4.  On 15 September 2008, the applicant's request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial was approved.  The commander directed the issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions.

5.  On 8 October 2008, the applicant was discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10.  Accordingly, he was given a separation program designator (SPD) code KFS and an RE code 4.  His character of service was under other than honorable conditions.

6.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) prescribes eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard.  Chapter 3 prescribes basic eligibility for prior-service applicants for enlistment and includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes.  RE code 4 applies to persons separated from their last period of service with a non-waivable disqualification.  This regulation further provides that RE codes may only be changed if they are determined to be administratively incorrect.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  The SPD code KFS was the appropriate code based on the guidance provided in this regulation for Soldiers separating under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.  Additionally, the SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table establishes RE code 4 as the proper RE code to assign to Soldiers for this reason.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his RE code 4 should be changed so that he may enlist in the Army.

2.  The RE code 4 establishing his ineligibility for enlistment/reenlistment was correctly entered on his separation document in accordance with governing regulations.

3.  There is no apparent basis for removal or waiver of the applicant's disqualification that established the basis for the RE code 4.  While the applicant's desire to serve his country is commendable, there are no provisions authorizing the change of an RE code for this purpose.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ____X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010153



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010153



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022751

    Original file (20100022751.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 January 2007, the applicant was discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10. RE code 4 applies to persons separated from their last period of service with a non-waivable disqualification. The SPD code of KFS was the appropriate code based on the guidance provided in this regulation for Soldiers separating under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012082

    Original file (20140012082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his reentry code (RE code) "4" be changed to RE "3" so he can reenter the service. The applicant states his RE code was changed from "3" to "4" by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB). On 11 April 2014, he was notified that the ADRB denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018297

    Original file (20090018297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his reentry eligibility (RE) code 4 be changed so that he may enlist in the Army. On 27 October 2008, the applicant was discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10. The SPD code of KFS was the appropriate code for the applicant based upon the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008586

    Original file (20100008586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was notified that charges were preferred against her and on 28 February 2008, after consulting with counsel, she submitted a request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows she was given a separation program designator (SPD) code of KFS (voluntary discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010531

    Original file (20110010531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, on the advice of his attorney. The ADRB determined the characterization of his service was too harsh and voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade to under honorable conditions and to restore his rank to SSG. The evidence of record also shows that when the ADRB upgraded the applicant's discharge, the board determined the reason for the discharge was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011092

    Original file (20080011092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The SPD code of KFS was the appropriate code for the applicant based upon the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008988

    Original file (20100008988.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial on 23 August 2007. He was discharged on 2 November 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010616

    Original file (20090010616.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On the same date, the applicant consulted with counsel and he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations). Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities, reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Therefore, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014439

    Original file (20100014439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 29 (Dates of Time Lost During This Period) of his DD Form 214 shows he had lost time under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972 during the period 11 May through 25 June 2007 for a total of 46 days. The evidence shows the applicant had 45 days of time lost due to AWOL. Upon his separation, his DD Form 214 showed he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018682

    Original file (20080018682.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show a reentry (RE) code which would allow him to enlist in the U.S. Army. The DD Form 214 that he was furnished at the time of his discharge shows that he had 3 months and 16 days of net active service; that he was furnished a separation code of "KFS" (in lieu of trial by court-martial); and that he was furnished an RE code of 4. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty,...