IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 24 August 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100008988
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests change of his reentry eligibility (RE) code from "4" to "3."
2. The applicant states:
* he would like his RE code changed because he made an oath to his country to serve and protect
* he needs to make right what he did wrong and he can't unless his RE code is changed
* he needs to serve alongside his fellow Soldiers
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 January 2007. He went absent without leave (AWOL) on 30 June 2007 and he returned to military control on 20 August 2007. Charges were preferred against the applicant for the AWOL period on 23 August 2007. The applicant requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial on 23 August 2007. He was discharged on 2 November 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served a total of 7 months and 20 days of creditable active service with 51 days of time lost.
2. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the following:
* Item 25 (Separation Authority) the entry "AR [Army Regulation] 635-200, CHAP [chapter] 10"
* Item 26 (Separation Code) the entry "KFS"
* Item 27 (Reentry Code) the entry "4"
* Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) the entry "IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL"
3. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code "KFS" is "in lieu of trial by court-martial" and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation
635-200, chapter 10.
4. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes:
a. RE-4 applies to Soldiers who are separated from their last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification. They are ineligible for enlistment.
b. RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable. They are ineligible unless a waiver is granted.
5. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated 15 June 2006, shows that Soldiers given an SPD code of "KFS" will be given an RE code of "4."
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record confirms the applicants RE code was assigned based on the fact that he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation
635-200, chapter 10. The RE code associated with this type of discharge is an "RE-4." Therefore, the applicant received the appropriate RE code associated with his discharge.
2. The applicant's RE code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations at the time of his separation. Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ____X___ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________X______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100008988
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100008988
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007285
On 7 June 2007, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed the issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. b. RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009501
The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application. The applicant requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial on 19 March 2007. He was discharged on 27 April 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014439
Item 29 (Dates of Time Lost During This Period) of his DD Form 214 shows he had lost time under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972 during the period 11 May through 25 June 2007 for a total of 46 days. The evidence shows the applicant had 45 days of time lost due to AWOL. Upon his separation, his DD Form 214 showed he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025593
On 4 October 2007, she requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. She was discharged on 21 November 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. Her RE code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations at the time of separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025407
He was discharged on 16 July 2009 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. Although the applicant was 17 years of age when he enlisted, he completed his training. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's RE code was assigned based on his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017062C071029
When discharged, the DD Form 214 he was issued showed he was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-210, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court- martial. The separation code "KFS" and a reentry code of 4 were applied to his DD Form 214. The applicant's discharge was reviewed by the ADRB and after careful consideration of his application, his military records, and all other available evidence, determined he had been properly and equitably discharged.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020210
He was discharged on 14 November 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code "KFS" is "in lieu of trial by court-martial" and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011030
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, there is no evidence which shows she was a victim of sexual harassment. The applicant's RE code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations at the time of her separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008998
In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated he understood that by requesting discharge he was admitting guilt to the charge against him or of a lesser-included offense that also authorized the imposition of a discharge under other than honorable conditions. The applicant's company commander recommended discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), in lieu of trial by court-martial. d. Army Regulation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022915
The applicant requests an upgrade of his reentry (RE) code. This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD code of "KFS" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.