Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010103
Original file (20100010103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  19 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100010103 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 30 August 1969 to show award of the Purple Heart. 

2.  The applicant states in late 1968 or early 1969, while assigned to the 8th Field Hospital, a rocket wounded a fellow Soldier outside of his hooch.  During the process of carrying the fellow Soldier to safety for treatment he got covered with blood from the fellow Soldier's wounds.  The applicant states he wiped away the blood, but saw nothing or felt nothing at the time.  However, in November 2008, X-rays revealed that he had a small piece of shrapnel in his wrist.  The applicant indicates at the time of the rocket attack there was so much confusion that he did not feel any pain and he had no reason to have his wrist checked out because the fragment from the rocket was so small that it did not leave a hole. 

3.  The applicant indicated that he provided X-rays of his wrist; however, the
X-rays are not available.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 22 January 1968.  He successfully completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 52B (Power Generator Equipment Operator).

3.  On 9 June 1968, the applicant arrived in Vietnam and was assigned to the 523rd Field Hospital.  On 15 October 1968, he was reassigned to the 8th Field Hospital.

4.  On 25 August 1969, the applicant departed Vietnam.  On 30 August 1969, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).

5.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaigns Ribbons or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart.

6.  There is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam and the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

7.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was wounded and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart.

8.  The applicant's Army medical treatment records are unavailable for review.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided any evidence that shows he was injured as a result of hostile action while assigned to an infantry unit engaged in active ground combat.  As the applicant acknowledged, he did not believe he was wounded at the time so he did not receive treatment for any wounds.

2.  Regrettably, in the absence of corroborating evidence showing the applicant was treated for a wound/injury that was the direct result of or caused by enemy action, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been satisfied in this case.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010103



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010103



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008220

    Original file (20120008220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The Purple Heart requires: * the wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. There is no evidence in the available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021588

    Original file (20140021588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He should be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 31 January 1968, at the beginning of the TET Offensive [Republic of Vietnam], which were not reported. c. He was wounded during the attack when he was pushed to the cement sidewalk while running to his assigned bunker and sustained injuries to his right leg, including deep lacerations, blood loss, and bruising. His DD Form 214 shows he was credited with the completion of 3 years, 10 months, and 20 days of total active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017053

    Original file (20140017053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Item 40 (Wounds) he fractured his left wrist on 10 July 1969. d. Item 41 (Awards and Decoration) no awards of the Purple Heart. f. Each approved award of the Purple Heart must exhibit all of the following factors: wound, injury or death must have been the result of enemy or hostile act; international terrorist attack; or friendly fire (as defined in paragraph b(8) above) the wound or injury must have required treatment by medical officials; and the records of medical treatment must have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001981

    Original file (20090001981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA's Compensation and Pension Exam Hospital Summary shows that on 26 March 1969, the applicant was admitted with a chief complaint of pain at left ankle area where he had an old gunshot wound. The applicant's military service records do not contain any general orders awarding him the Purple Heart. There are no medical records available which show that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017020

    Original file (20140017020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The communications center where the applicant was assigned was also under attack and explosions were occurring all around them. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Based on these statements, it appears the applicant ran from the communications center during the mortar fire attack and ran into the wall surrounding the building and knocked himself unconscious.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057235C070420

    Original file (2001057235C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 1 December 1967 and the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 17 February 1967 through 14 February 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002864

    Original file (20090002864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Even the applicant's former first sergeant only stated that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071593C070402

    Original file (2002071593C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his claim for award of the Purple Heart, the applicant provided Department of Veterans Affairs documentation which shows that service connection was granted for multiple shrapnel wounds. He states that “When Comrade [applicant’s last name] was wounded in battle, I recall that one of our Medics had administered treatment out in the field of Comrade [applicant’s last name] shrapnel wounds.” The applicant also provided an eyewitness statement, dated 28 February 2002, from a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101104C070208

    Original file (04101104C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded on 12 November 1965 while serving in Vietnam. He noted that the applicant had "applied for the Purple Heart Medal for wounds received in action in Vietnam."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000610

    Original file (20080000610.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant contends, in effect, that he is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart because he was wounded in action on 2 September 1968 while serving in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received as a...