| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | |
| Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin | Member |
2. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states that since his unit was overrun, no record was made at the time. Then, after he was treated, the records were destroyed when rockets and mortars hit the camp. He provides two notarized letters from fellow soldiers and his VA rating decision as supporting evidence.
4. The applicant’s military records are not available. Information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.
5. The applicant was inducted into the Army on 17 February 1967. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). He arrived in Vietnam on or about 23 July 1967 and was assigned to Company C, 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry (1/5th Infantry), 25th Infantry Division as a rifleman. He was reassigned to Company B, 1/5th Infantry, 25th Infantry Division on 2 August 1967 where he performed duties as a rifleman, personnel carrier driver (from 10 November 1967 through 15 March 1968), and team leader. He departed Vietnam on 13 July 1968. He was released from active duty on 14 February 1969 after completing 1 year, 11 months, and 28 days of creditable active service with no lost time. His Enlisted Qualification Record, DA Form 20, shows that his conduct and efficiency had been rated as excellent throughout his period of service.
6. The applicant provides statements (originally provided to the VA in 1996) from two comrades who were assigned with him in Vietnam. Mr. D___ states that on or about 1 December 1967 a small explosive grenade or rocket hit their carrier almost exactly where the applicant was standing. The applicant, who was returning fire with the armored personnel carrier’s .50 caliber machine gun, was blown completely out of the carrier. When he rushed to the applicant, D___ noticed his ears were bleeding profusely. He could not be taken to the hospital immediately because every man was needed. Later, when he left the hospital, D___ noticed the applicant was wearing ear plugs. Only a few days later a rocket exploded at the hospital where he had been treated and demolished most if not all of the medical records inside.
7. First Sergeant (retired) D___ states that on 1 December 1967 their unit received heavy enemy fire. The applicant was his armored personnel carrier driver and took up his position firing a .50 caliber machine gun on the carrier when a small rocket hit the back lid of the carrier right where the applicant was standing. The applicant was thrown out of the carrier. Later that same day the First Sergeant noticed blood running out of the applicant’s ears but could not send the applicant to the hospital until two days later because he could not be spared. When the applicant did go to the hospital, he returned wearing ear plugs. Their medical people at battalion turned in awards for the casualties. However, a few days after the applicant was treated the battalion aid building was hit by hostile rocket fire and all the records were destroyed.
8. The records on Mr. D___ could not be located but records on First Sergeant (retired) D___ were. They verify that he was the First Sergeant of Company B, 1/5th Infantry, 25th Infantry Division from 2 November 1967 until on or about 30 June 1968.
9. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations. It stated that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. A concussion injury caused as a result of enemy-generated explosions is an example of an enemy-related injury which clearly justifies award of the Purple Heart. It also stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a soldier’s conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as “excellent” for the entire period of qualifying service.
10. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that the 1/5th Infantry was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm for the period January 1966 through August 1968 and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class for the period 1 January 1966 through 21 January 1970.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The statements of individuals are normally inadequate as the sole basis for an award of the Purple Heart because they do not fulfill the regulatory requirement that there be a record of medical treatment. However, in this case the supporting statements from the applicant’s former First Sergeant and another soldier are credible evidence that the applicant did in fact receive the wounds claimed and was treated by competent medical personnel. They also offer a plausible explanation of why medical documentation is not available. Any doubt should be resolved in favor of the applicant.
2. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant met the eligibility criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 17 February 1967 through 14 February 1969.
3. The applicant was assigned to a unit during a period of time that unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class. Therefore, he is also entitled to wear those awards.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 1 December 1967 and the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 17 February 1967 through 14 February 1969.
2. That the applicant’s DD Form 214 be amended to add the Purple Heart, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class.
BOARD VOTE:
__kak___ __rwa___ __kwl___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Karol A. Kennedy
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001057235 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010710 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001178
The applicant states that he was wounded in action on 20 September 1968 while serving as a medical specialist with an infantry company in the Republic of Vietnam. Records show that the applicant participated in four campaign periods during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart (third award) for wounds received on 20 September 1968; b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016711
Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, General Orders (GO) Number 1055, dated 8 March 1968, awarded the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action against a hostile force on 5 March 1968. The applicant's request for correction of his military service records to show he sustained a concussion and was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart was carefully considered. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002864
There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Even the applicant's former first sergeant only stated that the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000323
His available records do not contain orders for the Purple Heart. The applicant provides a copy of a certificate showing he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 25 April 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to the following awards to item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214: * Purple Heart * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005173
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant states that he was wounded on 17 December 1967 while serving as an infantry squad leader in his infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065168C070421
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all awards, decorations and badges to which he is entitled. The applicant’s service personnel records contain 25th Infantry Division General Orders Number 5769, dated 8 August 1968, which awarded him the Silver Star for gallantry in action on 1 February 1968. Orders show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge while a member of the 173rd Airborne...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008643
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart for being wounded or injured in action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Good Conduct Medal for the period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006282
Therefore, in the absence of evidence showing he was anywhere other than with his assigned unit, there is sufficient evidence to award him the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending HQ, 25th Infantry Division GO Number 191, dated 11 June 1966, to show the correct spelling of the applicant's last name as "XXRX" instead of "XXEX." b. awarding him the: (1) Purple Heart with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002152
The applicant provides: * Congressional correspondence * Letters to/from the National Personnel Records Center * Letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) * Request pertaining to military records * Statement from Mr. J-----y C. W---s * Mr. J-----y C. W---s' certificate for award of the Purple Heart * Letter from First Sergeant (1SG) E----d C--e (Retired) * DA Form 1 (Morning Report) * Previous Record of Proceedings CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Lieutenant McK---t and he (the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010280C070208
There also is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart and there is no evidence in his records that shows he was treated for wounds as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...