Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009683
Original file (20100009683.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	    31 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100009683 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the service number shown on his DA Form 1861 (Transcript of Military Record).

2.  He states, in effect, his service number was mistyped on his DA Form 1861 as ending in “321” and it should be shown as ending in “231.”  It is important he has the correct data to use.

3.  He provides copies of the following:

* His DA Form 1861
* His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States)
* His Certificate of Appointment

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed his Army records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant's available military records show he served on active duty in the Army of the United States from 21 September 1948 through 20 September 1949. He enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 21 September 1949a and was called to active duty on 16 October 1950.  His DA Form 1861 shows his Service Number ends with “321.”

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 21 November 1951 and transferred to the Enlisted Reserve Corps.  Item 2 (Service Number) of his 
DD Form 214 shows his service number ends with “231.”  He was appointed in the Army of the United States on 21 July 1953.  The service number listed on his appointment certificate also ends with “231.”

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows the applicant was assigned a Service Number that ends with “231.”  However, it appears when his DA Form 1861 was completed an error occurred and his service number is shown to end with “321.”  However, his DD Form 214 and 21 July 1953 appointment certificate correctly show his service number ends with "231."  

2.  Based on the foregoing it would be appropriate to issue him an appropriate document correcting is DA Form 1861 to show his military service with the correct service number.

BOARD VOTE:

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by issuing the applicant an appropriate document to correct his DA Form 1861 to show his military service with his correct service number ending with "231."  



      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009683



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009683



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012561

    Original file (20120012561.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His DD Form 214 shows in item 3 (SSN) "321-XX-XXXX." A thorough review of his official military personnel file shows he used his Army service number or SSN "231-XX-XXXX" the entire time he served in an active duty status.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078893C070215

    Original file (2002078893C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is authorized to members who are wounded in action. The evidence of record includes a DA Form 1861, DA OTSG Hospitalization Record, and entries in the DD Form 214, that confirm that the applicant was wounded in action in Korea on 15 June 1952, that he received medical treatment for that wound, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007254

    Original file (20070007254.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her deceased husband's records, a former service member (FSM), to show awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Korean Service Medal, the United Nations Service Medal, the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation, the Republic of Korea War Service Medal, and the Korea Defense Service Medal. Since the FSM's service in Korea was between 13 August 1954 and 12 August 1957, the FSM, therefore, did not serve a qualifying period for award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013670

    Original file (20080013670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations), in effect at the time, established uniform administrative procedures and separation forms to be used in connection with the relief from active duty or complete separation of enlisted and warrant/commissioned officer personnel. If the grade at the time of separation was not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank if different from the date of appointment is entered in item 38. The evidence of record shows that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010343

    Original file (20110010343.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. He served a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal and the Republic of Korea War Service Medal which are not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show both awards. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020171

    Original file (20110020171.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) for the period ending 24 June 1953 of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to show his dates of last civilian employment (item 41) as 1941 to 1943 instead of 1943 to 1946. The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. While the FSM's DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 June 1953 shows his dates of last civilian employment as 1943 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023116

    Original file (20110023116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 February 1950 shows: * His rank at the time of entry into active duty was private * the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp as an authorized award * He had no time lost 6. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for this period of service and his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 September 1953 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022254

    Original file (20120022254.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) with an effective date of separation of 6 February 1954 to show his grade as sergeant (SGT). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. His orders awarding him the Army Commendation Medal are dated 1 month after the date of grade shown on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020326

    Original file (20130020326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not list his completion of 21 weeks of the Wire Electronic Repairman Course and does not show his temporary appointment to the rank of CPL. He has no evidence and the Army has all the records. The applicant’s complete military records are not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023587

    Original file (20110023587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) as follows: * Item 3 (Grade - Rate - Rank and Date of Appointment) to show he was appointed as a corporal (CPL) on 12 October 1952 instead of 1953 * Item 8 (Reason and Authority for Separation) to, in effect, list the correct date * Item 38 (Remarks) to show his permanent grade as private first class (PFC) instead of private (PV2) 2. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the...