Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025593
Original file (20100025593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100025593 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her reentry (RE) code be changed.

2.  The applicant states the RE code was unjust considering the amount of time that was served. 

3.  The applicant provides her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 August 2006.  Her charge sheet shows she was absent without leave (AWOL) on 17 October 2006 and she returned to military control on 1 October 2007.  On 4 October 2007, she requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.  She was discharged on 
21 November 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.  She completed a total of 3 months and 17 days of creditable active service with 348 days of lost time.

2.  Her DD Form 214 shows the following:

* item 25 (Separation Authority) – "AR [Army Regulation] 635-200, CHAP [Chapter] 10"
* item 26 (Separation Code) –"KFS"
* item 27 (Reentry Code) –"4"
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – "IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL"

3.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD codes to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code "KFS" is "in lieu of trial by court-martial" and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.

4.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard.  Table 3-1 includes a list of the RE codes:

	a.  RE-1 applies to persons completing an initial term of active service who were fully qualified when last separated.

	b.  RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable.  They are ineligible unless a waiver is granted.

	c.  RE-4 applies to Soldiers who are separated from their last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification.  They are ineligible for enlistment.

5.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated 15 June 2006, shows that Soldiers given an SPD code of "KFS" will be given an RE code of 4.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  She contends her RE code was unjust considering the amount of time served.  However, she only served a total of 3 months and 17 days of creditable active service.  Her lost time (from 17 October 2006 to 30 September 2007) does not count.

2.  The applicant has not submitted any evidence that would warrant a change to her RE code.  Her RE code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations at the time of separation.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to change her RE code.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025593



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025593



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011030

    Original file (20110011030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, there is no evidence which shows she was a victim of sexual harassment. The applicant's RE code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations at the time of her separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020210

    Original file (20090020210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was discharged on 14 November 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code "KFS" is "in lieu of trial by court-martial" and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001609

    Original file (20110001609.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 25 June 2007, she requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001965

    Original file (20110001965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record does contain a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which shows she was discharged on 2 November 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial with issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. There is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008586

    Original file (20100008586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was notified that charges were preferred against her and on 28 February 2008, after consulting with counsel, she submitted a request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows she was given a separation program designator (SPD) code of KFS (voluntary discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018347

    Original file (20080018347.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table provides that when an individual is assigned a SPD code of "KFS" with a narrative reason for separation of “in lieu of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008998

    Original file (20100008998.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated he understood that by requesting discharge he was admitting guilt to the charge against him or of a lesser-included offense that also authorized the imposition of a discharge under other than honorable conditions. The applicant's company commander recommended discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), in lieu of trial by court-martial. d. Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019508

    Original file (20090019508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities, reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. By regulation, the SPD code of KFS and an RE code of “4” will be assigned to members who are discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025407

    Original file (20100025407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was discharged on 16 July 2009 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. Although the applicant was 17 years of age when he enlisted, he completed his training. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's RE code was assigned based on his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000931

    Original file (20070000931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code “KFS” is “In lieu of trial by court-martial” and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. Records show the...