Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008295
Original file (20100008295.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	 17 August 2010 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100008295 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not reflect his awards of the BSM and the AGCM.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, a copy of his orders and citation for award of the BSM and an official statement from The Adjutant General of the Army awarding him the AGCM.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted in Minneapolis, Minnesota on 9 November 1966.  He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 17 July 1967 for assignment to the 4th Battalion, 9th Infantry Regiment, 25th Infantry Division as a medical corpsman.

3.  He remained in Vietnam until 8 August 1968 when he was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee.  He had served 1 year and 9 months of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Combat Medical Badge, and the Purple Heart.

4.  Documents provided by the applicant show he was awarded the BSM for meritorious service during the period July 1967 to July 1968 and the AGCM for the period of November 1966 to August 1968.

5.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.  Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that subsequent to the applicant’s departure from Vietnam, his unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal - First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation for the period he served with the unit.  Additionally, the applicant participated in four campaigns while assigned to Vietnam and thus is entitled to be awarded four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded VSM.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant has provided sufficient evidence to show he was awarded the BSM and the AGCM.  Accordingly, they should be added to his DD Form 214 at this time.

2.  Additionally, the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation and he is entitled to four bronze service stars to be worn on his VSM to represent his campaign participation.  Accordingly, he is entitled to have his DD Form 214 corrected to reflect these awards.


BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x____  ___x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his DD Form 214 the BSM, AGCM, RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation, and four bronze service stars to be worn on his already awarded VSM.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008295



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008295


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021818

    Original file (20100021818.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). He had served 1 year, 8 months, and 4 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and the Vietnam Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018250

    Original file (20100018250.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was awarded all of those awards and they were omitted from his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM. Adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: * BSM with 1OLC and “V” Device * ARCOM with 1OLC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082730C070215

    Original file (2002082730C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the BSM for service in Vietnam from 13 December 1967 to 24 June 1968 and it was never included on his DD Form 214. Accordingly, the applicant's records should be corrected to reflect the award of the BSM. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that he was awarded the BSM and by awarding the individual concerned the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091247C070212

    Original file (2003091247C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the evidence does not clearly establish the date the applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-5, documents contained in his records that are dated as early as 16 August 1969 and all the way through the date of his REFRAD, indicate his rank as that of a sergeant. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 28 November 1967 through 13 August 1970. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001033

    Original file (20100001033.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and his secondary military occupational specialty (SMOS). The applicant was awarded the BSM subsequent to his REFRAD and thus he is entitled to have that award added to his DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066812C070402

    Original file (2002066812C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the RVNCM. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090343C070212

    Original file (2003090343C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 6 November 1963, he transferred to Vietnam with his unit. While in Vietnam, his commander submitted a recommendation to award the applicant the award of the Silver Star for gallantry in action in Vietnam on 2 and 3 March 1964. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded the BSM with "V" Device that was not included on his DD Form 214 at the time of separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083977C070212

    Original file (2003083977C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 1 September 1966 through 27 July 1969. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001388

    Original file (20080001388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action on 19 September 1967 in Vietnam and that he was medically evacuated for treatment and he was subsequently retired as a result of permanent physical disability. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 4 April 1966 through 22 April 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090245C070212

    Original file (2003090245C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Although there are no orders present in the applicant's records to verify his claim that he was awarded the Purple Heart in Vietnam, there is sufficient evidence available...