Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008230
Original file (20100008230.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100008230 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, and any other awards he may have earned.

2.  The applicant states the requested medals are not annotated on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States).  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of his Service Record.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG) on 22 June 1948 and held military occupational specialty 4405 (Clerk Typist).

3.  On 5 September 1950, he was ordered into active military service and he was assigned to Service Company, 110th Infantry, Camp Atterbury, IN.  He also served in Germany from on or about 20 November 1951 to on or about 19 April 1952.  

4.  He completed 1 year, 7 months, and 26 days of creditable active service during this period, of which 4 months and 28 days was foreign service.  He was honorably discharged in the rank/grade of corporal (CPL)/E-4 on 30 April 1952.

5.  Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the Army of Occupation Medal (Germany).

6.  Item 38 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 and Section 15 (Time Lost Under Articles of War 107) of his DA Form 24A (Service Record) show he had no lost time.

7.  Section 24 (Endorsements) of his DA Form 24A shows he received an "Excellent" character and efficiency rating and he was favorably considered for award of the Good Conduct Medal.

8.  His records do not contain official orders awarding him the Good Conduct Medal.  Additionally, his service records do reveal any nonjudicial punishment (NJP) or other derogatory information that would have disqualified him from receiving his first award of the Good Conduct Medal.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for the following awards:

	a.  The Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  

	b.  The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined.  
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms he served honorably from 5 September 1950 through 30 April 1952.  He attained the rank of CPL/E-4, completed a period of foreign service, and received an "excellent" conduct and efficiency rating.  Furthermore, his record is void of any lost time and/or NJP.  It appears it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and correct his records to show this award.

2.  The evidence of record shows he served a qualifying period for award of the National Defense Service Medal which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 5 September 1950 through 30 April 1952; and 

	b.  adding the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and the National Defense Service Medal to his DD Form 214.


      _______ _X   _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008230



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008230



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007387

    Original file (20120007387.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 17 August 1950 through 16 August 1953 * adding to his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010697

    Original file (20110010697.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal from 25 September 1951 through 16 September 1963. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021224

    Original file (20130021224.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003538

    Original file (20090003538.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the National Defense Service Medal and correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 31 August 1948 through 30 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021514

    Original file (20110021514.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant sustained a wound to his head on 30 November 1950 as a result of hostile action while in Korea. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the PH and correction of his DD Form 214 to show it. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 30 November 1950 in Korea; b. awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (First Award)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019103

    Original file (20140019103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His WD AGO Form 24A (Service Record) shows the following entries in applicable sections: * Section 6 (Original Assignment and Organizations to Which Subsequently Assigned During This Period of Service) shows he served in Korea as follows: * Heavy Mortar Company, 24th Infantry Regiment, 1 May 1951 to 29 September 1951 * Company G, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 30 September to 9 November 1951 * 343rd General Hospital, 10 November 1951 to 3 December 1951 * Camp Drake, Japan, 4 to 14 December 1951 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019310

    Original file (20130019310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The available records indicate the applicant served honorably throughout his active duty service from 15 May 1951 through 27 May 1953.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011769

    Original file (20130011769.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Regrettably, in the absence of evidence that conclusively shows he actively participated in ground combat, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004963C070208

    Original file (20040004963C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Powers | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect that his military record be corrected to show all awards that he may be authorized. The applicant is authorized award of the GCMDL for his honorable period of service from 17 January 1949 to 11 September 1952.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003271

    Original file (20140003271.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. His DD Form 214 shows: * he was promoted to the temporary rank of corporal on 11 November 1951 * he completed 11 months and 6 days of foreign service * he earned the following awards: * Korean Service Medal with 1 bronze service star * United Nations Service Medal * Army of Occupation Medal (Japan) 5. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...