Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019310
Original file (20130019310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130019310 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states he should be awarded this medal.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, the applicant provided his DD Form 214 which is sufficient for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 May 1951 and he entered active duty on that date.  He held military occupational specialty 1966 (Automotive Repair Inspector) and his last unit of assignment was Company C, 124th Ordnance Maintenance Battalion, Germany.

4.  He was promoted to the rank/grade of corporal (CPL)/E-4 on 19 December 1952.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 27 May 1953 in the rank of CPL and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  He completed 2 years and 13 days of creditable active service with no lost time.  One year, 7 months, and 24 days of this service was foreign service.  

6.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp.

7.  His DD Form 230 (Service Record) or DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) which would have shown his conduct and efficiency ratings are not available for review with this case.  

8.  Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards and decorations.  It states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available records indicate the applicant served honorably throughout his active duty service from 15 May 1951 through 27 May 1953.  He served overseas for the majority of his military service, attained the rank of CPL, and was honorably discharged in that rank.  His DD Form 214 confirms he had no lost time and his transfer to the USAR confirms he was eligible for further service at the time of his release from active duty.

2.  In the absence of derogatory information that would show he had been disqualified for the Army Good Conduct Medal, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

3.  He served during a qualifying period for award of the National Defense Service Medal; therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this medal.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 15 May 1951 through 27 May 1953
* adding to his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and the National Defense Service Medal



      ____________x_____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019310





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019310



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010697

    Original file (20110010697.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal from 25 September 1951 through 16 September 1963. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003163

    Original file (20150003163.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. However, the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to determine his eligibility for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 17 May 1951 through 30 April 1953 and adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019154

    Original file (20140019154.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011769

    Original file (20130011769.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Regrettably, in the absence of evidence that conclusively shows he actively participated in ground combat, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011732

    Original file (20130011732.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows: a. the applicant qualified for award of the National Defense Service Medal; b. the applicant qualified for award of the Korean Service Medal and he served in three campaigns during his service in Korea. Thus, he is entitled to three bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Korean Service Medal; c. the applicant qualified for award of the Republic of Korea War Service Medal; and d. general orders awarded the applicant's unit the ROK PUC. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018212

    Original file (20130018212.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008544

    Original file (20130008544.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. c. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 6 October 1950 through 5 October 1953. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 6 October 1950 through 5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007387

    Original file (20120007387.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 17 August 1950 through 16 August 1953 * adding to his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006399

    Original file (20110006399.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although all of the applicant's military records are not available for review, his DD Form 214 shows he was inducted as a PV1/E-1 and he was honorably released from active duty in the temporary rank of CPL/E-4 after completing almost 2 years of active service with no time lost. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 14 February 1951...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028184

    Original file (20100028184.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show his Prisoner of War (POW) status during the Korean War. Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. He served during a qualifying period of service in Korea for entitlement to the Republic of Korea War Service...