Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007745
Original file (20100007745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100007745 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states that he was the best “DAM” sergeant who ever made sergeant in 1 year and he has two Purple Hearts and went beyond the call of duty many times while in Vietnam and he believes he deserves it.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  He was inducted into the Army of the United States in Kansas City, MO on
2 May 1966 and he was transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, MO to undergo his basic training and then to Fort Gordon, GA to undergo his advanced individual training (AIT) as an infantry indirect fire infantryman.  He completed his AIT and he was transferred to Fort Benning, GA for assignment to Company B, 4th Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, 199th Infantry Brigade.

3.  On 21 November 1966, he was transferred to Vietnam with his unit and he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 15 September 1967.  He departed Vietnam on 23 October 1967 and he was transferred to Fort Riley, KS where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 1 May 1968 due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS).  He had served 2 years of total active service.  There is no evidence of a commander's disqualification for award of the AGCM in his records.

4.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD indicates he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Purple Heart with 1st oak leaf cluster, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badges with Pistol Bar, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

5.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) show he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his record is void of any derogatory information that could serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM.

6.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

7.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of Soldiers for 


campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.  Paragraph 6d states that Department of the Army General Orders 8, 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to the following units:

	a.  Headquarters, United States Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973.

	b.  Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) also shows that at the time of the applicant’s assignment to Vietnam, his unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during the period 12 December 1966 - 31 August 1970m by Department of the Army General Orders 51, dated 1971.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following two campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase II (1 July 1966 to 31 May 1967)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase III (1 June 1967 to 29 January 1968)

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the award of the AGCM, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 2 May 1966 through 1 May 1968.  This conclusion is based on the fact that he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service, the record is void of any derogatory information which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.  Therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM
(1st award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

2.  Additionally, the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded VSM.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected accordingly.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  __X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal;

	b.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period
2 May 1966 through 1 May 1968; and

	c.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal
(1st award), Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100007745



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                              

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020974

    Original file (20100020974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 11 May 1966. Additionally, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was awarded to all units that served in Vietnam between 20 July 1965 and 28 March 1973 which were subordinate to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam by DAGO Number 8, dated 1974. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020960

    Original file (20140020960.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 15 June 1964 to 14 June 1967 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for his qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009764

    Original file (20110009764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214; two letters from the National Personnel Records Center, dated 13 April 2011 and 22 April 2011; an internet printout of unit awards received by the 1st Aviation Brigade; and a portion of DA Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register). The evidence of record shows he served honorably on active duty from 14 March 1966 through 23 February 1969, and his DA Form 20 shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016739

    Original file (20110016739.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records that shows he was awarded the AGCM; however, neither is there evidence of a commander's disqualification for the award. There is no evidence of a commander's disqualification statement pertaining to his first award of the AGCM; therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award), for the period 8 September 1966 and 6 September 1968, and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020531

    Original file (20110020531.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records that show he was awarded the AGCM; however, neither is there evidence of a commander's disqualification for the award. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023502

    Original file (20100023502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the AGCM for the period 28 June 1965 to 27 June 1968 and correction of his records to show this award. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021506

    Original file (20130021506.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he never received the AGCM. He should be awarded the AGCM for the period 6 August 1965 to 16 July 1967 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 6 August 1965 to 16 July 1967; and c. adding to his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002915

    Original file (20140002915.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Although multiple awards of this unit citation are not authorized for wear, official military and historical records will indicate all awards received. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 13 October 1966 through 10 October 1969 * deleting award of the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021323

    Original file (20140021323.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, to correct his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the award of the Soldier's Medal and be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023552

    Original file (20110023552.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had served 2 years of active service and his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Vietnam Campaign Medal. A review of the applicant's records shows he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service and his records do not contain derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for the...