Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007628
Original file (20100007628.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100007628


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) be added to his records.

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the AGCM, but it is not shown on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States).

3.  The applicant provides:

* a copy of his DD Form 214
* a page from his DD Form 230 (Service Record) showing award of the National Defense Service Medal and Army of Occupation Medal (Germany)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years on 14 July 1953.  He was trained as an infantryman, transferred to Germany, and assigned to the 373rd Armored Infantry Battalion.  He served in Germany from 28 December 1953 to 21 December 1954.  When he departed Germany, his commander rated his character and efficiency as "excellent" and recommended him for award of the AGCM.

3.  In January 1955, the applicant returned to the United States and Fort Sheridan, IL, where he was processed for separation.  He was honorably separated on 16 May 1955.

4.  The applicant's records show promotions from private/E-1 to private/E-2 and private first class/E-3; he was never reduced in rank.  The records also show he had no lost time and no court-martial convictions.

5.  Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Medals), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  A Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings, including those pertinent to attendance at service schools, must have all been recorded as "excellent" or higher, except that ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration and service school efficiency ratings of less than "excellent" entered prior to 3 March 1946, would not be disqualifying.  There must have been no convictions by court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

6.  The applicant's records show he qualified as a marksman with the M-1 rifle and the 81-milimeter mortar.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he was awarded the AGCM, but it is not shown on his DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant's records show no derogatory information, "excellent" character and efficiency ratings, and a positive recommendation for award of the AGCM from his commanding officer.

3.  The already-awarded AGCM should be added to the applicant's DD Form 214.  Likewise, the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1) and Mortar Bar (81MM) should be added to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

_____X___  ____X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
adding the AGCM and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1) and Mortar Bar (81MM) to his DD Form 214.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100007628



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR2010000762

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012129

    Original file (20130012129.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 29 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Germany from 20 July 1961 through 3 July 1962. According to Table 2-2, Soldiers assigned to Berlin during the period 14 August 1961 through 1 June 1963 qualified for award of the AFEM. His record does not show he was stationed in Berlin; therefore, barring evidence to the contrary, there is an insufficient basis to award him either the AOM or AFEM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021177

    Original file (20130021177.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with M16 Rifle and 81mm Mortar bars. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the first award of the AGCM for his service from 27 November 1967 through 26 November 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002331

    Original file (20130002331.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 8 November 1966 through 25 August 1969 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022358

    Original file (20130022358.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows: a. general orders awarded the applicant the ARCOM for meritorious service during the period August 1968 to August 1969; b. special orders awarded the applicant the CIB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000389

    Original file (20150000389.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains a DA Form 20 that shows in: a. item 22 (MOS) he was awarded PMOS 11C on 20 January 1970; b. item 22 he was awarded PMOS 71B on 15 July 1970; c. item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 12 February to 15 June 1970; d. item 38 (Record of Assignments) while serving in Vietnam he was assigned to Company E, 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment from 27 February to 15 June 1970 in duty MOS 11C1O; e. item 38 that he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009313

    Original file (20140009313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005186

    Original file (20140005186.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show he was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar and the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review. With respect to the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, without conclusive evidence to show he qualified as sharpshooter with the rifle,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002719

    Original file (20150002719.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records are void of orders showing award of the PH or the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003525

    Original file (20140003525.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 August 1968. His OMPF includes the following order numbers (#) and letter which shows the applicant earned the following weapons qualifications and awards: a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying period of honorable service from 30 August 1968 to 21 August 1970; b. amending item 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016566

    Original file (20110016566.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and the campaign medals he received. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to awarding him the AGCM...