BOARD DATE: 24 August 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100007577
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he made a timely claim to receive his separation pay. He also requests payment of his separation pay.
2. The applicant states that he should have received $7,000.26 when he was separated in May 1991. In 1993, he received a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) adding authorization to receive separation pay. At the time he received this correction, he was incapable of realizing the government was trying to contact him. The DD Form 215 showed his old address. He believes that the check, if mailed, was not forwarded to his new address. At the time he was devastated by the passing of his younger brother. Had there been a point of contact or instructions, he would have complied. In his grief, he did not even open the letter until many years later when he rediscovered it.
3. The applicant further states that his current situation is one of financial hardship. He is partially disabled. His right hip has been replaced and needs his left hip replaced. Medical bills for ongoing therapy and doctor visits have been constant. He works full time, mostly in pain, and supports his family as best as he can. He has a second mortgage to pay for his son's college tuition. His wife has ongoing medical problems that have been expensive. He respectfully asks the Board's favorable consideration in this matter. He understands if legislature negates a claim of interest on this pay, but the original amount that was to be paid would greatly help his family at this time.
4. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214; DD Form 215; envelope, postmarked 10 May 1991; and a letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), dated 15 December 2009.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. On 3 November 1982, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army. His military occupational specialty was 91V (Respiratory Specialist). His duty assignments included the Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, DC; the 121st Evacuation Hospital in Seoul, Korea; and the Medical Activity at Fort Dix, New Jersey.
3. On 1 June 1985, the applicant was promoted to sergeant/pay grade E-5.
4. On 10 May 1991, the applicant was discharged due to failure to meet the Army's body fat standards. He had completed total of 9 years, 3 months, and 12 days of creditable active duty service.
5. On 26 May 1993, a DD Form 215 was issued to add the following statement to item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214: "Separation Pay - $7,000.26."
6. The DFAS letter provided by the applicant states, in essence, that the applicant requested his separation pay, but the Barring Act of 1940 precluded payment of the applicant's separation pay because he had waited 19 years to file his claim.
7. Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3700(b)(1), states every claim against the United States is barred unless such claim is received within 6 years after the date such claim first accrued. Regulations issued under Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3700(b)(1), were modified to provide that a claim can be filed with the agency out of whose activities the claim arose to toll the 6-year Barring Act. However, this amendment affected only those claims not barred as of 15 June 1989.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show that he made a timely claim to receive his separation pay. He also requests payment of his separation pay.
2. The evidence clearly shows the applicant was authorized to receive separation pay at the time of his discharge from the Regular Army. However, it appears that the authorization was not provided until 2 years after his actual separation.
3. The applicant further argues that he did not receive his separation pay and because of the death of his younger brother and a change in his mailing address, he was unaware at the time of his entitlement to this pay.
4. In the interest of justice, the applicant's records should be corrected to show that he made a timely claim for this separation pay.
5. Furthermore, DFAS should audit the applicant's military pay records to determine whether he was or was not paid this separation pay and, if he was not, payment should now be made.
BOARD VOTE:
___x____ ___x____ ___x____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. showing that he made a timely claim for payment of separation pay in the amount of $7,000.26,
b. auditing his military pay records to determine the status of his separation pay, and
c. paying him any monies due him as a result of this correction.
__________x_______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100007577
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017064
The DA Form 4187-E, dated 13 December 1993, and DFAS Leave and Earnings Statement show the applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-4 prior to his separation from active duty. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to paying the applicant for 25.5 days accrued leave if the audit of his records shows he has already been paid...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017341
The Board noted that an Enlisted STAB denied the applicant's request to remove the DA QMP bar to reenlistment and that an Enlisted Special Review Board denied his request to remove the relief for cause NCOER. There is no evidence the applicant was issued a DD Form 215 to show he was retired from active duty in the rank of SSG/pay grade E-6 with an effective date of pay grade of 1 August 1993. A letter from the applicant to DFAS, dated 12 May 2009, in which he stated that he retired from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022462
Overall, several errors were committed in relation to her pay in December 1998 and then her retirement formula, computation of her retired pay, the length of time she was placed on the TDRL, and the more recent debt that occurred as a result of an audit of her pay records by DFAS. The applicant provides: * Self-authored breakdown of each LES * Listing of what appears to be her credit report * Divorce decree * Audit Request Form * Letter, dated 3 August 2009, from DFAS * Letter, dated 22...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002298
An email from DFAS confirmed the following: * the applicant notified DFAS of his divorce on 14 July 2014 * his premiums were suspended that same day * currently the applicant does not show a beneficiary for SBP * he requested reimbursement of all SBP premium payments dating from his divorce on 7 May 2003; a credit was issued for the past 6 years * the credit was given on 4 September 2014 7. The applicant provides: a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011636
The GAARNG should have placed the FSM in the Retired Reserve for medical reasons and issued him a 15-year letter. The evidence of record shows the FSM was discharged from the GAARNG on 2 July 1991 by reason of medical unfitness. He was discharged from the Selected Reserve effective July 1991, over a year before the authority to issue 15-year letters was enacted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017792
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 July 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130017792 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his military records be corrected to show: a. his former spouse remarried on 16 March 1997 (before age 55); b. his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) payments were suspended; and c. his SBP premiums were refunded. The applicant provides: * Former spouse's marriage license * Excerpt from the Army Echoes Newsletter * Divorce decree * DA Form 4240 (Data for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012647C080213
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 January 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070012647 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The available evidence shows that the applicant was eligible to receive FSA-T for the period he attended BNCOC, 5 April through 16 July 1993, in a TDY status. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004657
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show: * all updates directed as a result of an approved recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) * all awards he is authorized * the appropriate entries on his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) to indicate he was retired due to a combat-related disability incurred in the line of duty (LOD) 2. As a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to amend the DA Form 199 to reflect the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011624
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the highest grade held as specialist (SPC)/E-4 and relief from the 6-year barring statute in order to receive payment for severance pay at the rate for pay grade E-4. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states to enter the grade in which the enlisted Soldier was serving at the time of separation in item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and the pay grade in item 4b (Pay...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009900
Title 10, US Code, section 1174, states that "a regular enlisted member of an armed forces who is discharged involuntarily or as a result of the denial of the reenlistment of the member and who has completed six or more, but less than 20 years of active service immediately before that discharge, is entitled to separation pay under subsection (d) unless the Secretary concerned determines that the conditions under which the member is discharged do not warrant payment of such pay." The Service...