Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007453
Original file (20100007453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  12 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100007453 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to include his:

* promotion to captain
* completion of the Staff Process Course of the Combined Arms and Service Staff School
* U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) service from December 2000 to February 2004

2.  The applicant states the above items were not put on his record when he left the Reserves due to Reserve oversight.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was commissioned a second lieutenant in the USAR on 23 July 1987.  He was ordered to 3 years active duty effective 14 November 1988.

3.  On 14 February 1992, the applicant was released from active duty by reason of the expiration of his term of service.  He was released in the rank of first lieutenant and had completed 3 years, 3 months, and 1 day of active service that was characterized as honorable.  The only DD Form 214 in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is for the period from 14 November 1988 to 14 February 1992.

4.  On 21 July 1994, the applicant was promoted to captain.

5.  On 10 September 2001, the applicant completed the Staff Process Course of the Combined Arms and Service Staff School.

6.  On 25 November 2002, the applicant was discharged from the USAR.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should include his:

* promotion to captain
* completion of the Staff Process Course of the Combined Arms and Service Staff School
* USAR service from December 2000 to February 2004

2.  The applicant was discharged from the USAR on 25 November 2002.  There is no record of him having served in the USAR after that date.

3.  The only DD Form 214 contained in the applicant's OMPF is for the period 
14 November 1988 to 14 February 1992.  This DD Form 214 provides a brief, clear-cut record of his active duty service at the time of his release from active duty.  His promotion to captain, course completion, and any subsequent USAR service occurred after the date of his release from active duty.  Therefore, these 

events are not entered on his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 
14 February 1992.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x______  __x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100007453





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                        

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009286C070205

    Original file (20060009286C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that Reserve officer promotion from captain to major is primarily dependent upon the education requirement of graduation from an Officer Advanced Course (OAC). The opinion stated that the applicant was selected for promotion by the 2003 Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board and promoted with a DOR of 18 August 2003, the approval date of the board. The applicant was selected for promotion to major by the 2003 Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015606

    Original file (20080015606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his promotion packet was considered by the 2008 Major Army Promotion List (APL) Board, however, he was not selected for promotion due to lack of an education waiver. The memorandum, further alerted the applicant to the mandatory education requirements for promotion as specified in Army Regulation (AR) 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and warrant Officers Other than General Officers) and that if he had completed the education requirements not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052119C070420

    Original file (2001052119C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Following the non-selection for promotion, the applicant requested that this Board correct his records to reflect that the period he was in a questionable status not be considered toward his mandatory promotion date. Records of the ARNG show the applicant’s periods of service as 6 June 1979 to 15 February 1985 - Regular Army (RA), 16 February 1985 to 31 December 1998 - Army Reserve (USAR) and 1 January 1999 to the present - NYARNG. Section 2-2, Inactive and active status, states that an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089561C070403

    Original file (2003089561C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no documentary evidence in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), such as a diploma, certificate of training, or academic evaluation report, to indicate that he completed the Chaplain Officer Basic Course. The applicant was discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve on 24 July 1996, after he had completed his 8-year service obligation. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION :

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 2005005199C070206

    Original file (2005005199C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion to captain. In an advisory opinion, dated 1 July 2005, the Chief, Personnel Division, Departments of the Army and the Air Force, National Guard Bureau (NGB), Arlington, Virginia, stated that the applicant was commissioned in the TXARNG as a second lieutenant on 3 November 1987, completed his bachelor's degree on 11 August 1989, and was separated from the ARNG and transferred to the USAR on 9 November 1989. Records show the applicant should have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007333C070206

    Original file (20050007333C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His request was approved by the appropriate authority at Arlington Hall Station and on 31 December 1988, he was honorably released from active duty and was transferred to the Retired List in the pay grade of E-9, effective 1 January 1989. A review of the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File fails to show that he served on active duty in the rank of major. The applicant did not serve on active duty in the rank of major and therefore is not eligible for advancement to that grade on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106064C070208

    Original file (2004106064C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-175 states, in pertinent part, that officers in the grade of first lieutenant, captain, or major, who completed their statutory military obligation, will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after the second consideration by a Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board. Army Regulation 350-100 (Officer Active Duty Service Obligations) states, in pertinent part, that officers graduating from the Special Forces Detachment Officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088498C070403

    Original file (2003088498C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 March 1978, he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve. Army Regulation 135-155 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers) states, in pertinent part, it requires 7 years time in grade (TIG) as a CPT to be considered for mandatory promotion to MAJ or a minimum of 4 years TIG to be eligible for consideration for a unit vacancy promotion. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014910

    Original file (20100014910.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since she has over 18 years of military service, she is in a "grandfather status" and is entitled to retention in the USAR until she accrues 20 qualifying years for full retirement pay under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 1223. On 1 August 1988, she non-concurred with the findings and recommendation of the PEB and requested a formal hearing. It provided for MEB's which were convened to document a Soldier's medical status and duty limitations insofar as duty was affected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081991C070215

    Original file (2002081991C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It includes the same information as MILPER Message Number 99-068 and included a notification paragraph which informed the eligible officers that a Selective Continuation (SELCON) Board might be conducted to allow captains not selected for promotion to remain on active duty. Records show the applicant declined selective continuation and was separated from active duty on 1 March 2000. The Board noted that the law was amended in October 2000 which authorized OTRA officers who declined...