Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007333C070206
Original file (20050007333C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            09 MARCH 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20050007333


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Jessie B. Strickland          |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Richard Dunbar                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Jeanette McPherson            |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. David Tucker                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be advanced to the rank of major on the
Retired List.

2.  The applicant states that he was promoted to the rank of major in the
United States Army Reserve (USAR) and should have been advanced to the
highest grade he held in his Reserve status, which was major.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his USAR identification card showing
the rank of major, copies of orders showing his attendance at the Command
and General Staff Course (C&GSC), and a letter showing his consideration
for promotion to the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 31 December 1988.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 22 February 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  After serving 11 years, 8 months and 13 days in the Nevada Army
National Guard, he was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-6 on 8
November 1966.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 November 1966 and on 5
February 1968, upon graduation from Officer Candidate School (OCS), he was
honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-6 to accept a commission as an
officer in the Army.

4.  He was commissioned as a USAR second lieutenant on 6 February 1968,
with a concurrent call to active duty as an air defense officer.  He was
promoted to the rank of captain on 6 February 1970 and on 17 July 1972, he
was honorably released from active duty due to reduction in strength.  He
was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Standby) and at the same time,
he enlisted in the Regular Army in the pay grade of E-6 for a period of 3
years.
5.  He continued to serve through a series of continuous reenlistments and
was promoted to the pay grade of E-9 on 9 December 1983.  Meanwhile, he was
promoted to the rank of major in the USAR on 25 May 1979.

6.  On 30 August 1988, the applicant submitted an Application for Voluntary
Retirement (DA Form 2339) requesting retirement for length of service
effective 1 January 1989.  At the time he submitted his application he
indicated that the highest grade he held on active duty was the pay grade
of E-9.

7.  His request was approved by the appropriate authority at Arlington Hall
Station and on 31 December 1988, he was honorably released from active duty
and was transferred to the Retired List in the pay grade of E-9, effective
1 January 1989.  He had served 23 years, 1 month and 29 days of total
active service and had 33 years, 10 months and 4 days of service for pay
purposes.

8.  On 2 November 1995, the date he attained 30 years of active service and
service on the Retired List, he was advanced to the rank of captain (O3-E)
on the Retired List.

9.  A review of the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File fails to
show that he served on active duty in the rank of major.

10.  Title 10, United States Code, provides, in pertinent part, that
enlisted personnel may be advanced in grade to the highest grade
satisfactorily held while on active duty, as determined by the Secretary of
the Army, upon completion of 30 years of service.  This service may consist
of combined active service and service in the USAR Control Group (Retired).
 Satisfactory service for retirement in the rank of major required a
minimum of 6 months of active duty in that rank.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

2.  In order to be advanced to a higher grade on the Retired list, the
applicant must have at some time been advanced to and served on active duty
in a higher grade prior to his being placed on the Retired list and must
have a combined total of 30 years of service (active and/or service on the
Retired list).  The applicant did not serve on active duty in the rank of
major and therefore is not eligible for advancement to that grade on the
Retired list.  However, he has been properly advanced to the rank of
captain on the Retired list, the highest grade he satisfactorily served in
while on active duty.  Therefore, there appears to be no basis for further
advancement on the Retired list.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 2 November 1995; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on 1 November 1998.  The applicant did not file within
the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling
explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice
to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___RD __  ___JM __  ___DT___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  _____Richard Dunbar_____
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050007333                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060309                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |19890101                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 635-200, CH 12                       |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |RETIREMENT                              |
|BOARD DECISION          |(DENY)                                  |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |AR 15-185                               |
|ISSUES                  |319/ADV GRD                             |
|1.131.0900              |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007246

    Original file (20080007246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his retired rank as a major (MAJ) instead of captain (CPT). Rather, his service on active duty after his REFRAD as a USAR CPT was entirely served as an enlisted member of the Regular Army. It has been noted that the applicant’s DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that he was REFRAD as a MAJ O-4 and further indicates that he was serving as a commissioned officer at the time of his REFRAD, when in fact he was serving on active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058600C070421

    Original file (2001058600C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026823

    Original file (20100026823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served on active duty from the date he was commissioned until he was honorably relieved from active duty as a CPT on 1 January 1987. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3964 provides that each retired RA enlisted member who is retired with less than 30 years of active service is entitled, when active service plus service on the retired list totals 30 years, to be advanced on the retired list to the highest grade in which he/she satisfactorily served on active duty, as determined by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021843

    Original file (20100021843.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record is void of any evidence and he did not provide any evidence showing he served in an active duty status in the rank of major. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to now correct his records to show he was advanced on the retired list in the rank of major/pay grade O-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016533

    Original file (20130016533.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. there is no evidence she ever performed any duties as a Reserve officer on active duty from 1988 to 2006; however, she provides evidence that she performed duties and training as a Reserve officer in the Active Army. The applicant served in a dual status as an enlisted Soldier in the Regular Army and as a Reserve commissioned officer in the USAR. Although the evidence shows she held a Reserve commission from 1988 to 2006, this duty was in a Reserve status, not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008038

    Original file (20090008038.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his retired rank as major (MAJ)/pay grade O-4 effective on his 60th birthday and six years of back pay for the difference in pay between pay grade O-3 and O-4. However, there is no evidence that he served on active duty in the rank of MAJ for at least 6 months. The applicant's records show he served more than 10 years on active duty in a commissioned officer status and his records show he elected to be transferred to the Retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009121C070205

    Original file (20060009121C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time of his selection for promotion to major on 5 March 1991, he was an ARNG officer. The applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to major while on active duty. The applicant should have been considered for promotion to major by a mandatory Reserve promotion board one year after the date of his transfer to the IRR in 1994 and again in 1995.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013465

    Original file (20100013465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to be advanced to major on the Retired List based on his active service plus his service on the Retired List totaling 30 years. The applicant states his commission and eligibility for retirement at the grade of captain/pay grade O3E were restored by an Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision in 1996. As a result of ABCMR Docket AC96-05172, the applicant's records were corrected to show: * he was released from active duty on 1 August 1993 as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006209C071113

    Original file (20070006209C071113.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that shows that she served on active duty as a Major. Further, advancement of enlisted members to a commissioned officer rank and pay grade on the Retired List requires that the member actually held and satisfactorily served in that higher commissioned officer grade while on active duty. The evidence of record further shows that while serving on active duty in an enlisted status, the applicant was promoted to MAJ/0-4 in the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007287

    Original file (20080007287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that since he had over 11 years of commissioned service when he retired and should have been retired in his commissioned rank and grade not his enlisted rank and grade. The Soldier must have completed all required service obligations at the time of retirement. The applicant's records were properly reviewed by the Army Grade Determination Board and he was properly advanced on the Retired List upon completion of 30 years of combined active and retired service.