Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000493
Original file (20100000493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000493 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, his military records be corrected by canceling his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) participation for spouse and children coverage. 

2.  The applicant states:

* He received a Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) in December 2009 showing he was charged $95.33 for RCSBP
* He did not retire until his 60th birthday
* He retired while he was on active duty
* When he retired they collected SBP costs for his wife and there was never anything mentioned to him about paying RCSBP premiums each month since his retirement in March 2005
* There has just been one SBP cost shown on his LESs since he retired
* He does not believe he should be paying for the RCSBP
* He can understand someone retiring at age 55 and not reaching their 60th birthday having to pay but he retired on his 60th birthday	  

3.  The applicant provides an LES, dated 2 December 2009, in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on 5 March 1945.  Having prior active enlisted service in the Regular Army and inactive service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), the applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 20 January 1973.      

3.  The applicant's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) was prepared on 16 May 1991.  The applicant's DD Form 1833 (SBP Election Certificate), dated 31 July 1991, shows he enrolled in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage, option C (immediate coverage), full base amount.  Section II of this form stated, "IMPORTANT:  The decision you make with respect to participation in this Survivor Benefit Plan is a permanent irrevocable decision.  Please consider your decision and its effect very carefully.”   

4.  On 27 May 1992, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Army National Guard for appointment as a Warrant Officer.  He was appointed a Chief Warrant Officer Two in the Army National Guard on 28 May 1992.  On 22 June 1998, he was separated from the Army National Guard and transferred to the USAR.  He entered active duty on 4 April 2003.  

5.  On 5 March 2005, the applicant turned age 60.

6.  On 10 March 2005, the applicant was released from active duty in the rank of Chief Warrant Officer Four.  He had completed under 12 years of active Federal service.  He was placed on the retired list on 1 April 2005.

7.  In support of his claim, the applicant provided an LES, dated 2 December 2009, which shows, in pertinent part, SBP coverage (spouse only) cost of $198.61 and RCSBP cost of $95.33.  

8.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

9.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation, (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday, or (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  Once a member elects either options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.  Option B 
and C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60.  They cannot cancel SBP participation or change options they had in RCSBP, and RCSBP coverage automatically rolls into SBP coverage.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  He had been on active duty when he turned age 60, but he did not retire because he completed 20 years of active Federal service.  He retired because he was a Reservist who turned age 60.

2.  The applicant’s DD Form 1883 shows he enrolled in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage, option C (immediate coverage), on 31 July 1991.  That was an irrevocable election that rolled over into the standard SBP upon reaching age 60.  Had he died anytime after his July 1991 RCSBP election and prior to age 60 his spouse would have received an annuity.  The applicant must now pay for that coverage.  No premiums will be refunded and RCSBP deductions will continue.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.   

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000493



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000493



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010058

    Original file (20080010058.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 March 2008, when he submitted his request for retired pay at age 60, the applicant elected spouse full coverage under the SBP and on 16 May 2008, when he turned 60 years of age, he began receiving retired pay with SBP deductions for spouse only. Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60. The applicant’s contention that he opted not to participate in the SBP has been noted; however, prior to making that election, the applicant enrolled in the RCSBP under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005016C071029

    Original file (20070005016C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    John G. Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. His wife is a Master Sergeant in the U. S. Army Reserve and will have her own retired pay. Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004655

    Original file (20120004655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 August 1987, he completed DD Form 1883 wherein he listed his retirement date as "17 June 1992." Three options were available: * Option A - elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation * Option B - elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60, but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday * Option C - elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60 Once a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004444

    Original file (20090004444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected by canceling his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election for spouse and children coverage. The applicant states, in effect, that when he applied for retirement on 18 June 2008 he enrolled in the SBP only after being assured that he could opt out of this program at any time by submitting a DD Form 2656-2 (Survivor Benefit Plan Termination Request). In support of his claim, the applicant provided a DD Form 2656, dated 18...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023565

    Original file (20110023565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * Upon his divorce in 2001, he notified officials at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) that he was divorced and did not want to participate in the SBP * When he applied for retired pay in January 2011, he and his new spouse elected not to participate in the SBP * When he received his first Retiree Account Statement, he noticed that he was enrolled in the SBP and his first wife was listed as the beneficiary * DFAS corrected the next pay statement by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006521

    Original file (20090006521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a separate letter to DFAS, Military Retirement Pay the applicant requested termination of the Natural Interest Person SBP coverage. The Reserve Component cost of the SBP accounts for the annuity cost if the applicant had died prior to his 60th birthday as he elected Option C (Immediate Coverage) on his DD Form 1883 that he submitted on 10 January 1991. The premium for the Reserve Component portion of the RCSBP is a debt the applicant incurred when he elected Option C. As such, his named...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012720

    Original file (20130012720.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He is now 63 years of age and payments for the RCSBP continue to be taken out of his retired pay. The evidence of record confirms the applicant elected RCSBP spouse only coverage, Option C, based on the full amount of his retired pay. In addition, as he elected RCSBP Option C, there is an additional cost added to the SBP deduction to cover the benefit of immediate coverage from the date he made the election to the date he turned 60 years of age.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019212

    Original file (20140019212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * Army regulations in effect at the time the FSM submitted his retired pay application required the submission of a DD Form 2656 (Data For Payment of Retired Personnel) * After an exhaustive search with the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) advised her that they could not find this document * She was never counseled or provided any documentation to sign for or notarize to relinquish of the SBP * She was married to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021525

    Original file (20100021525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 8 March 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021525 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His 20-year letter notified him, in pertinent part, that upon receipt of this letter, a qualified Reserve Component (RC) married member would automatically be enrolled in the RC Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) under Option C, Spouse and Child(ren) coverage based on full retired pay, unless his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007955

    Original file (20110007955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he elected to decline participation in the Survivor Benefit Program (SBP) at the time of his retirement on 8 July 2010. The applicant was born on 8 July 1950 and he was serving in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) when he received his 20-year letter and submitted his DD Form 1883 on 18 December 1991 in which he elected full spouse coverage under option C (immediate coverage). Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient...